Apache JMeter vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Apache and Parasoft are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. Apache is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while Parasoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Apache holds a 6.2% mindshare in APIT, compared to Parasoft’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

Apache JMeter

Read 97 Apache JMeter reviews

7,641 Views
2,751 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

4,513 Views
1,219 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Apache JMeter

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Apache JMeter are leading tools in the software testing industry. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and strong customer support, while Apache JMeter is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust API testing, automated report generation, and advanced support for continuous integration. Apache JMeter stands out with its load testing capabilities, ease of integration with various plugins, and open-source flexibility. Users find Parasoft SOAtest more feature-rich but acknowledge JMeter's extensive adaptability.

Room for Improvement: Users of Parasoft SOAtest desire better integration with certain third-party tools and improvements in testing speed. Apache JMeter users often mention the need for a more intuitive interface and enhanced support for newer protocols. Both tools show specific areas where enhancements can make them more efficient, with Parasoft focusing on integration and JMeter on usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is regarded for its straightforward deployment process and excellent customer support, with users noting quick responses and helpful guidance. Apache JMeter users find deployment simple but often manage it independently due to community support. Parasoft's professional support provides an edge over JMeter's community-driven assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest has a higher initial setup cost, which some users feel is justified by its advanced features and strong ROI over time. Apache JMeter, being free and open source, provides an immediate cost advantage, with users typically investing only in customization and scalability efforts. Despite the higher price, Parasoft SOAtest users report better ROI due to its reliability and support.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache JMeter vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.9

Apache JMeter offers cost-effectiveness and efficiency over expensive alternatives, enhancing ROI through reduced maintenance and testing capabilities.

Sentiment score

6.7

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency and ROI with minimal coding, despite lacking a comprehensive metrics system.

With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.

WaqarTufail

Automation Architect at Aion Digital

I have not seen a return on investment right now, as there is no improvement in Apache JMeter and reduction in cost, but I save time and reduce costs with Apache JMeter.

Abhishek-Verma

Principal Performance Test Engineer at KiwiTech LLC

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.2

Apache JMeter relies on community support, offering vast online resources and efficient user collaboration despite no official customer support.

Sentiment score

7.7

Customer service is excellent, with fast responses and effective problem resolution, despite challenges with complex issues and regional availability.

With AI models ChatGPT, troubleshooting issues has become very easy for us.

Raja Rao Malkari

Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation

The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.

Shiva Сhandan

Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.

WaqarTufail

Automation Architect at Aion Digital

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

Apache JMeter is scalable but faces challenges with high loads, manual work, and configuration, affecting user experience ratings.

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest scales well with proper licensing, though larger tests and memory management need careful planning in CI/CD contexts.

We do have some methods where we can distribute the complete load between multiple systems and then try to do our testing.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.

Shiva Сhandan

Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.

Sadish Kumar

Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Apache JMeter is stable but may face issues with high loads, requiring adjustments and expertise for optimal performance.

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable, but memory consumption can cause occasional issues, especially with complex scenarios on low-end systems.

JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.

Shiva Сhandan

Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.

Sadish Kumar

Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware

Previous versions of Apache JMeter were a little unstable, but the new versions are very stable.

Raja Rao Malkari

Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Room For Improvement

Apache JMeter struggles with load handling, UI issues, automation, scripting, integration, report generation, documentation, and user support.

Parasoft SOAtest needs better reports, interface, performance, integration, automation, documentation, price, startup time, memory use, and user-friendliness.

With AI becoming more prominent, they can implement features where it can generate code by itself based on the results or provide suggestions.

Raja Rao Malkari

Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation

Currently, we need to use multiple separate JMeter instances to simulate reductions in load, which isn't ideal.

Shiva Сhandan

Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities.

Sadish Kumar

Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Setup Cost

Apache JMeter is a free, open-source tool ideal for budget-conscious enterprises compared to pricier commercial solutions.

Enterprise buyers find Parasoft SOAtest expensive but worthwhile due to robust features and scalability, despite complex licensing.

Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.

Shiva Сhandan

Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.

Abhishek-Verma

Principal Performance Test Engineer at KiwiTech LLC

It's a cost-effective solution.

Sadish Kumar

Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Valuable Features

Apache JMeter is a flexible, open-source tool for performance testing, valued for its GUI, plugin support, and community.

Parasoft SOAtest provides rapid functional testing setup, extensive API support, seamless integration, and comprehensive validation tools for scalable end-to-end testing.

JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.

Sadish Kumar

Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware

It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.

Swetha Mahasivbhattu

Performance Test Engineer at CEI

Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.

Sreenivasula Mukkamalla

Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache JMeter report

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter

Ranking in API Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (1st), Load Testing Tools (1st)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in API Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (14th), Test Automation Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apache JMeter is 6.2%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 5.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache JMeter	6.2%
Parasoft SOAtest	5.2%
Other	88.6%

API Testing Tools

Q&A Highlights

Avigail Sugarman

Community Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

Aug 07, 2014

Jmeter vs SOAtest?

JMeter ======= 1. JMeter has been developed primarily to test web based applications. 2. It's better suited for perform Performance testing of web based applications. 3. It's scalable and can be distributed over different machines and can be controlled from a central location. 4. JMeter does have good text parsing controllers like JEXL, Regular Expression which could be better for finding out patterns in a data set and can be a good option for APM kind of applications. 5. Supports Ruby, Java, JavaScript, BeanShell 6. JMeter is good for non-programmers also as it offers test suite building blocks (Controllers) to easily manage you application without writing code. SOATest ======== 1. SOATest has been developed for API testing. 2. The good thing of SOATest is that it can integrate with HP Quality Center, Rational TestManager, Microsoft VSTS, Parasoft Concerto, and other commercial or internally-built frameworks to manage tests and execution results. 3. It can test underlying Java, C, C++, or .NET code. 4. It supports wide variety of protocols viz. SOA / Web services Java .NET languages XML WSDL WADL UDDI WSIL SOAP PoX (Plain XML) REST JSON BPEL Web Applications Mobile Web Interfaces RIA AJAX JSP JavaScript HTML CSS WS-* Standards MTOM(XOP) / MIME / DIME Attachments Oauth TCP/IP webMethods Broker webMethods IS Hl7 FTP HTTP 1.0 HTTP 1.1 HTTPS JMS IBM WebSphere MQ Sonic MQ RMI EJB SMTP Tibco Rendezvous .NET WCF (TCP, HTTP, WS Transaction Flow) ISO 8583 EDI custom/others

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Raja Rao Malkari

Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation

Have built custom performance test scripts and integrated them into automated pipelines seamlessly

Apache JMeter has its own pros and cons when compared to other tools. It is easy to use the tool and it has open-source capability so we can build our custom scripts and execute them. It provides other capabilities, such as integrating a database and connecting to other application servers for monitoring and related functions. We use dynamic HTML reporting, which helps us in testing analysis by pinpointing the bottlenecks based on the reports. We can identify the specific areas that need attention, troubleshoot them, and report to the development team. The user-friendly GUI for creating and managing tests makes it very easy to drag and drop samplers. For example, if you want the HTTP sampler, you can drag and drop it and use it. For configurations, we have other samplers. For results, we have the view results samplers that we can also drag and drop. The UI is good in comparison with other tools. Regarding integration with CI/CD pipelines, we can create Apache JMeter scripts and use the Docker image. From the image, whatever scripting we have done can be connected. We can use the CI/CD pipelines and connect them with Jenkins tools and GitHub. Then we can create the pipelines and automate the end-to-end flow. For connecting Jenkins to Apache JMeter, JMeter plugins are available, and we have used them. Apache JMeter also has some third-party plugins, which are not native samplers. If we want to use custom test executions, we definitely use all the different plugins available in Apache JMeter. The capability to simulate users has impacted testing resources and outcomes as Apache JMeter is based on Java, which has a limit to the users in a particular load generator. Apache JMeter provides distributed load testing where you can connect multiple PCs in a master and slave concept, allowing you to pump the load with any number of users. In the past, I have done load testing with 10,000 users by connecting the Apache JMeter distributed network in BlazeMeter. There is a cloud version available, the updated BlazeMeter, and I used that. It is very easy to launch load generators in BlazeMeter, and then we can run the test, scaling up beyond 10,000 users.

Read full review

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache JMeter?

Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeter

Compared 12% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Apache JMeter

Compared 6% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More Apache JMeter Competitors

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

SoapUI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 2% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter

May 2026

Download Apache JMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

April 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

JMeter

SOAtest

Overview

Apache JMeter is a versatile, open-source tool designed for performance and load testing, widely recognized for its user-friendly interface and robust test automation capabilities. It supports a range of protocols and integrates seamlessly into various environments, making it ideal for high-load scenarios.

Apache JMeter stands out in performance testing for its ability to handle high transactions per second and perform distributed load testing effectively. Its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness are enhanced by its user-friendly GUI, which simplifies the testing process. Despite memory consumption concerns, Apache JMeter remains a top choice due to its large community support, comprehensive scripting capabilities, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous automated testing. Its robust protocol support meets diverse testing needs.

What are Apache JMeter's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies test creation and management.
Open-Source: Offers flexibility and community support.
Protocol Support: Handles multiple protocols effectively.
Integration: Works seamlessly with tools like Jenkins.
Scripting: Extensive scripting abilities for custom tests.
Platform Independence: Operates on various operating systems.

Which benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: No licensing fees due to open-source status.
Community Support: Access to a large user base for help and updates.
Scalability: Effective in high-load scenarios with distributed testing capabilities.
Automation: Integration with CI/CD for continuous testing.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed performance insights.

In industries like finance and banking, Apache JMeter is used extensively for performance validation to ensure system robustness under heavy user loads. It's integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing processes, allowing organizations to simulate real-world scenarios and ensure high-performance standards.

Apache

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2026

Free Report: Apache JMeter vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache JMeter vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.