Parasoft SOAtest vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Parasoft and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Parasoft holds a 1.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 14.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,343 Views
703 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,670 Views
10,455 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Parasoft SOAtest and Tricentis Tosca are leading solutions in the automated testing category. Tricentis Tosca has a slight advantage due to its user-friendly, scriptless automation, which makes it accessible to non-technical users.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest features extensive support for protocols like JSON and offers powerful scripting capabilities for custom validations, making it effective for API testing. Tricentis Tosca shines with model-based automation and broad technology support, facilitating rapid test case generation without coding. It supports various technologies, including UI and mobile testing, making it adaptable for enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its report customization and simplify the user interface. The refresh function and workspace management also require improvements. Tricentis Tosca needs to improve its reporting features and address its high pricing structure. Additionally, refining its licensing and smaller system integration processes would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest primarily supports on-premises and hybrid environments, with technical support known for its effectiveness. Tricentis Tosca offers flexible deployment options, including public cloud support, although its learning curve suggests room for customer support enhancements.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest, although expensive, offers high ROI by reducing time in test creation and execution. Similarly, Tricentis Tosca’s high pricing is justified by its comprehensive capabilities and automation strength, though it may be costly for smaller organizations. Both tools offer significant ROI through their automated testing efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency and ROI with minimal coding, despite lacking a comprehensive metrics system.

Sentiment score

6.7

Tricentis Tosca offers positive ROI through quick test automation, benefiting agile environments by reducing testing time and costs.

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Tasks that typically take ten hours are reduced to two to three hours, representing a threefold productivity gain.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Customer service is excellent, with fast responses and effective problem resolution, despite challenges with complex issues and regional availability.

Sentiment score

6.7

Tricentis Tosca's customer service is efficient and knowledgeable, though some users experience delays and desire process improvements.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

The overall competence of the support has declined; previously, the support was very good, but recently, it has become difficult to reach them and get solutions, and it's taking a lot of time.

Jayachandrap In

Technical Architect at MOURI Tech

My experience has been positive; their response to emails or phone calls in tech support is fast, usually between eight to ten hours.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

There is no way to mark the importance or criticality of incidents when creating them.

Soumya Jain

Test Automation Specialist at Accenture

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest scales well with proper licensing, though larger tests and memory management need careful planning in CI/CD contexts.

Sentiment score

7.2

Tricentis Tosca is praised for scalability, effectively managing concurrent tests and meeting enterprise requirements despite some cost challenges.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

It covers a breadth of applications and products, demonstrating excellent scalability that I have seen in reality.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Scalability is excellent with Tricentis Tosca.

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable, but memory consumption can cause occasional issues, especially with complex scenarios on low-end systems.

Sentiment score

7.4

Tricentis Tosca is generally stable, with minor errors, and users highly rate its reliable automated testing capabilities.

In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For performance and stability, Tricentis Tosca deserves a 10 out of 10.

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The stability of Tricentis Tosca is rated ten out of ten. It is very stable.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

I find stability issues when using the Vision AI feature; Tricentis Tosca is not very stable.

Soumya Jain

Test Automation Specialist at Accenture

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs better reports, interface, performance, integration, automation, documentation, price, startup time, memory use, and user-friendliness.

Tricentis Tosca struggles with upgrades, high costs, mobile testing difficulties, and requires improvements in AI, UI, and reporting.

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

The self-healing process should automatically handle any changes in web applications; for instance, if properties change inside the application, the tool should automatically take care of it, unlike other tools such as Mabl and TestComplete that have better self-healing capabilities.

Jayachandrap In

Technical Architect at MOURI Tech

The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work.

Soumya Jain

Test Automation Specialist at Accenture

If a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Parasoft SOAtest expensive but worthwhile due to robust features and scalability, despite complex licensing.

Tricentis Tosca's pricing is high, appealing to large enterprises with flexible licensing, though costly for smaller companies.

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros.

Soumya Jain

Test Automation Specialist at Accenture

For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate.

Aditya Chakradhar Nanduri

Sr Test Automation Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest provides rapid functional testing setup, extensive API support, seamless integration, and comprehensive validation tools for scalable end-to-end testing.

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based automation, scriptless testing, drag-and-drop functionality, and AI optimization, enhancing ease of use and integration.

The advantages include the custom tool and the extension tool where you can write scripts in different languages such as Groovy, Java, and Jython.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

The most useful features of Tricentis Tosca include API scanning, basic web application automation, and data validation capabilities.

Soumya Jain

Test Automation Specialist at Accenture

The features I find most valuable in Tricentis Tosca are that it's the easiest way to build the scripts and to do the CI/CD process; using Tricentis Tosca is very useful and easy.

Jayachandrap In

Technical Architect at MOURI Tech

The modular approach reduces scripting effort by at least fifty percent, which significantly cuts down on the script development time.

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis Tosca report

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in API Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th)

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in API Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 14.2%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	14.2%
Parasoft SOAtest	1.7%
Other	84.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best API Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.