OpenText Functional Testing and Tricentis Tosca are competitors in software testing solutions. OpenText Functional Testing holds an advantage due to its robust performance in handling both legacy and modern applications, whereas Tricentis Tosca primarily focuses on modern systems.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing is recognized for its user-friendliness, robust integration capabilities, and strong object identification supporting various applications. It also enhances testing precision with AI functionalities. Tricentis Tosca offers a seamless scriptless interface simplifying automation for users with limited technical skills. It supports extensive technologies and Vision AI capabilities for futuristic automation.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing faces challenges with high pricing, complex licensing, and technical difficulties, including script maintenance. Users seek better DevSecOps integration and Python support. Tricentis Tosca users call for better pricing structures and improved mobile automation, with licensing complexities needing modular and affordable options for smaller projects.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products are mainly available for on-premises deployment. Tricentis Tosca also provides some cloud options for more flexibility. OpenText Functional Testing's customer service receives mixed reviews with slow response times on complex issues, while Tricentis Tosca's support is helpful but costly, leading users to resolve basic issues internally.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is priced high, with significant licensing and support costs but provides substantial ROI through extensive automation benefits, covering diverse platforms. Tricentis Tosca, despite being expensive, delivers ROI through ease of use for non-technical users and extensive application compatibility, justifying its high price tag for large enterprises.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Tasks that typically take ten hours are reduced to two to three hours, representing a threefold productivity gain.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
My experience has been positive; their response to emails or phone calls in tech support is fast, usually between eight to ten hours.
The overall competence of the support has declined; previously, the support was very good, but recently, it has become difficult to reach them and get solutions, and it's taking a lot of time.
The support team engages actively, providing solutions and scheduling calls for more complex queries, making it easy to get assistance.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Tosca should focus on AI capabilities to provide additional features such as script writing in Playwright type scripts, offering options for both module-based and custom script test cases while ensuring cost efficiency.
It covers a breadth of applications and products, demonstrating excellent scalability that I have seen in reality.
Scalability is excellent with Tricentis Tosca.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
For performance and stability, Tricentis Tosca deserves a 10 out of 10.
The stability of Tricentis Tosca is rated ten out of ten. It is very stable.
I find stability issues when using the Vision AI feature; Tricentis Tosca is not very stable.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
The self-healing process should automatically handle any changes in web applications; for instance, if properties change inside the application, the tool should automatically take care of it, unlike other tools such as Mabl and TestComplete that have better self-healing capabilities.
Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial.
Moving to a cloud-based application rather than a desktop one could improve Tosca.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense.
A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros.
For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
Tricentis Tosca positively impacts my organization because it provides a full end-to-end automation solution, whether it is mainframe, DB, API, mobile, Windows application, web application, SAP applications, or any kind of application.
It allows for drag-and-drop functionality and demo automation in SAP-based applications, which can be challenging with other automation tools.
The most useful features of Tricentis Tosca include API scanning, basic web application automation, and data validation capabilities.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 9.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.7% |
| Other | 82.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 74 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
OpenText Functional Testing is designed for ease of use, featuring strong object identification, AI capabilities, and multi-platform integration. Its VBScript simplicity and cross-browser, mobile support make it versatile for handling UI and API tests.
OpenText Functional Testing provides a seamless testing experience with powerful automation capabilities. Its integration with technologies like SAP and Oracle, combined with record and playback features, makes it a go-to tool for comprehensive testing environments. Users find value in its flexibility to streamline both UI and API tests. Challenges include high costs and resource usage, and there's a demand for broader programming language support and improved integration with CI/CD pipelines. Enhanced AI functionalities and better documentation are also requested.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?OpenText Functional Testing is utilized in industries requiring robust testing frameworks like finance and healthcare. Companies automate web, desktop, and API applications, perform functional tests, and handle validations. Its adaptability to integration and broad technology support facilitates diverse testing needs.
Tricentis Tosca offers scriptless test automation, supporting diverse technology platforms, enabling users to swiftly create and manage tests without programming skills.
Tricentis Tosca is recognized for its scriptless approach to automation, greatly simplifying the test creation process. Its modular design and comprehensive technology support accommodate web, mobile, and ERP applications with ease. Users can integrate Tosca with multiple platforms, allowing seamless testing across diverse environments. Features like Vision AI enhance test coverage, while the model-based framework ensures efficient maintenance and scalability. Despite needing improvements in documentation, interface simplicity, and cost-effectiveness, Tosca remains a highly regarded tool in the testing automation landscape.
What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?Tricentis Tosca is frequently implemented in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it streamlines test automation for web applications, SAP, Salesforce, and database systems. Its ease of use enhances efficiency, allowing teams in these sectors to deploy and maintain reliable software solutions swiftly.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
