OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #25. OpenText holds a 9.4% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 96 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

6,480 Views
2,919 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

843 Views
446 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing and Oracle Application Testing Suite both compete in the automated testing tools category. OpenText has the upper hand in diverse testing environments due to comprehensive platform and browser support, while Oracle suits Oracle ERP environments better, offering a user-friendly scripting experience.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers extensive browser and OS support, seamless Excel integration, and enhanced object recognition, making it ideal for varied testing environments. Oracle Application Testing Suite is particularly effective for Oracle ERP environments, with intuitive script recording, error reporting, and performance testing integration.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs enhancements in object identification reliability and resource consumption, alongside improved integration for complex scenarios. Oracle could benefit from broader cross-platform compatibility, setup efficiency, and better support documentation for easier onboarding and customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText supports multiple deployment options, including on-premises and private cloud, but faces challenges with support responsiveness and complexity in technical knowledge. Oracle, focused on on-premises with optional hybrid cloud, has mixed support feedback, showing excellence in certain contexts but issues in resolution efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is considered expensive with complex licensing and high support costs, yet offers good ROI from its automation capabilities. Oracle provides competitive pricing, especially beneficial for Oracle-centric enterprises, sometimes offering functionalities for free. Both show potential productivity gains and ROI from task automation, with user satisfaction varying based on specific experience.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing is 9.4%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."

"The shared repositories can be used throughout all testing which makes jobs easier."

"Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier."

"It helps in identifying defects earlier. With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It helps us to provide early feedback."

"OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier."

"Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. I like the user interface. It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. It also has dark and light themes."

"One advantage of Micro Focus UFT is that it is more compatible with SAP, Desktop ECC SAP, than S/4HANA."

"It offers a wide range of testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"The solution is expensive."

"Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field."

"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."

"They should include AI-based testing features."

"Customer service is a big drawback. From my personal experience, after creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody."

"UFT still requires some coding."

"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"It's an expensive solution."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 8% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 34% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

June 2025

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

June 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

OATS

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.