Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Perfecto comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Oracle and Perforce are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #14, while Perforce is ranked #12. Oracle holds a 2.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to Perforce’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

3,736 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

6,166 Views
1,295 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Perfecto are leading solutions in the testing software category. Based on feedback, OATS is often chosen for its affordability and support, while Perfecto is favored for its advanced capabilities despite its higher cost.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides a robust platform for functional automation, performance testing, and Oracle application compatibility. Users appreciate its ease of use and comprehensive project testing features. Perfecto offers cloud-based automation, cross-platform testing, and high-quality reporting features that provide detailed insights for both manual and automated testing.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve object identification, enhance browser compatibility, and support more protocols like SSO. Perfecto users seek better reporting, improved interface usability, and faster execution speeds, particularly for iOS, alongside enhanced AI integration for predictive analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OATS is mainly deployed on-premises, with hybrid cloud options and praised support for its expertise. Perfecto offers flexible cloud deployment, using both public and private infrastructures, and is commended for quick and efficient support services.

Pricing and ROI: OATS is seen as cost-effective, especially for Oracle users, with flexible pricing. Perfecto, though more expensive, offers significant ROI through its extensive testing capabilities and device coverage, justifying its higher price for those needing comprehensive testing features.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

27th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (17th)

Perfecto

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 3.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Perfecto	3.5%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.5%
Other	94.0%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

reviewer1963857

Head of Quality at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

The network testing can be accessed from anywhere in the world, but the UI needs revamping

Recently, the network testing component where we can use Perfecto on devices has been the most valuable feature. There is very little competition out there in this regard. We use it for 4G and 5G testing of launched 5G and 4G brands. So, the network testing can be accessed from anywhere in the world. That is very valuable for us. Perfecto is very good when it comes to executing cross-platform testing. We have just gotten started on cross-browser testing. We already use Perfecto for the native-application testing on multiple devices. I think now we also use Perfecto for browser-related testing. So, all the cross-browser testing works well. We got a couple of licenses that we use. We can mostly see usage over time using the device logs. This is what matters the most to us, e.g., what team is using a device for how long. We use Cypress, and it supports it quite well. We use APM, and it also supports that quite well. We used to use the native quantum framework as well in the past, which was obviously well-supported, but now we have moved onto Cypress and APM. Also, we have Applitools, which is not open source, but a paid proprietary tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this and Load Test is simplicity."

"It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"It's user friendly and in-built API support makes it very easy to automate or develop an automation framework."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"We are continuously doing testing on different environments, devices, and platforms. It executes seamlessly on multiple devices without having any connectivity issues. It has been really helpful for us to test on cloud devices."

"I also like the reporting functions. We are constantly downloading these reports and sharing them with our final customers. They help us understand what kind of bugs are happening through the applications. The recording feature is handy because it lets us see a video of the process we run through the pipeline and discover the point at which the automation is breaking."

"We have seen the biggest improvement in cost savings, initially saving $2.6 million a year just on roaming charges."

"The most valuable feature is automated testing."

"Overall, it's a great solution."

"Overall, it has definitely translated to cost savings and the reason is multifold."

"Using the device lab has definitely helped us to scale our testing operations."

"When the scripts are stable, Perfecto is awesome."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"It does not provide easy diagnostics to ascertain end to end transaction monitoring."

"OTM Test Report – We needed to develop custom reports as there is less flexibility."

"We have stability issues with the server logging off when a script runs from OTM."

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support."

"There are certain bugs which were present but was cleared in subsequent releases of application, but still there is room for improvement in the Functionality testing tool when automating form-based applications."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"It would be nice if there were some kind of AI to compile a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature were automated."

"Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device."

"If we could run an accessibility test in Perfecto against builds, it would help us a lot. Currently, that's a very manual process for us. We haven't found a tool that can do accessibility scans for iOS and doesn't depend on engineering effort. Having a feature related to that would be really awesome for us."

"There was a discussion about having the capability to export the test results to a certain tool that we use in our project. If that were added it would be great not having to manually take screenshots, put them in a document, and share them on the different test management tools."

"On the analytics side, Perfecto is in need of improvement."

"I'm hoping that Perfecto will come up with browser testing as well because it would be easier to access it."

"We've had a couple of issues lately with videos not loading or browsers dying after some execution, although that happens very rarely."

"In iOS, it needs improvements with some limitations."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

October 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

October 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

OATS

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto

October 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.