OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5, while Oracle is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 7.8% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 47 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

6,476 Views
4,792 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

3,736 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud compete in the performance testing solutions category. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features that many users find worth the premium price.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides extensive automation capabilities with seamless integrations within Oracle’s ecosystem. It supports functional, performance, and automation testing across diverse Oracle applications. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers scalable, cloud-based load testing that efficiently handles high-volume transactions and supports numerous protocols with flexibility for global deployment.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve its object identification, browser compatibility, and script flexibility, with issues noted in Oracle-specific integrations and technical support timelines. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires enhancements in analysis depth, technical support responsiveness, and script conversion capabilities, alongside improvements in CI/CD and reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite is primarily on-premises but provides reliable if occasionally slow technical support. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers flexibility with cloud deployment options; however, it too has technical support delays. The cloud model simplifies deployment but can present integration challenges.

Pricing and ROI: OATS is generally less expensive, especially when used within an Oracle-centric ecosystem, offering free functional testing and cost-effective bundling with Oracle products. LoadRunner Cloud, though priced higher, gives flexibility through a pay-as-you-go model, and its cloud infrastructure offsets maintenance costs, delivering strong ROI potential despite the initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 7.8%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	7.8%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.5%
Other	89.7%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Centralized cloud testing has improved global load generation and real-time performance insights

The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well. The cloud-based load generators in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have benefited my testing setup because we can generate the load across the globe, which was previously a little bit difficult on the on-premises version. The user interface in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is intuitive and this will be easy to communicate and collaborate amongst the team also because sharing the online URL with the team, they can simply check the analysis and everything.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is having load generators in countries where we don’t have access to them."

"It is very easy to set up a load test, to start it and end it, and it is valuable that it is very easy to use."

"The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads."

"The solution can scale."

"From end-to-end, starting from creating the load scenarios, to running them, and then reporting, LoadRunner is the best tool."

"Customer Service is immaculate."

"The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

"In comparison to other HP products, it was very user-friendly."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"Now I feel its the best tool to automate any of the Oracle Products, which include Oracle EBS Applications, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, Adobe Flex, ADF applications, etc.."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"This product can facilitate the lowering of test execution times for operational people, as the bulk of the repeating test steps can be taken away by automating the EBS regression set in OpenScript every release."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Some improvements can be made to the solution's user interface"

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"One area for improvement in LoadRunner Cloud, especially for agile models, is its limited support for functional testing alongside its robust non-functional testing capabilities."

"The monitoring abilities were lacking."

"There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other."

"An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries."

"It should have a feature to report with a 99.9 percentile success rate."

"I don't like their reporting."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"Room for improvement would be for the reporting features. If they could improve the dashboards, that would be helpful."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"It does not provide easy diagnostics to ascertain end to end transaction monitoring."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"OTM Test Report – We needed to develop custom reports as there is less flexibility."

"The tool runs out of memory when the recording flows are long and involve many screens despite increasing the memory settings for OpenScript."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"The solution is expensive."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows it is very high and very costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) can be improved by incorporating code improvements. I would add that it reduces the initial setup complexity, improves the learning curve op...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

October 2026

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

October 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

OATS

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

October 2026

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.