

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and ReadyAPI compete in the performance and API testing market. LoadRunner Cloud generally has an advantage in scalability and cloud support but falls behind in user-friendliness compared to ReadyAPI.
Features: LoadRunner Cloud offers scalability supporting up to 1 million users, real-time anomaly detection, and SLA configurations, making it suitable for agile processes. It is cloud-based, enhancing its deployment flexibility. ReadyAPI excels with its comprehensive API testing capabilities, seamless integration with CI/CD tools, and robust functional testing features, particularly beneficial for API-centric environments.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Cloud needs better support for custom load patterns and simulation of network latencies and often struggles with custom reporting and backward compatibility. ReadyAPI could enhance its integration with databases, improve load testing efficiency, and provide better version control options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Cloud supports public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, offering versatile options, though some users note slow issue resolution in customer service. ReadyAPI is primarily on-premises but provides highly rated customer support and technical assistance, with video guides available, enhancing the user experience.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Cloud operates on a pay-as-you-go model which can be cost-effective but is often considered pricey compared to other options. ReadyAPI offers reasonable pricing, though separate licenses for functionalities can increase costs. Both products present a positive ROI, but LoadRunner Cloud may offer more savings in infrastructure costs due to its cloud-based model.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud); the analysis part is quite helpful, which is quite more descriptive than the other products.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial.
The database schema and everything, if they generate on the fly, that will be quite helpful, rather than creating it on our own.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well.
Its LoadRunner functionality allows us to record a solution's networking protocol and replay them.
We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 8.6% |
| ReadyAPI | 3.0% |
| Other | 88.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.