

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are both prominent players in the performance testing sector. LoadRunner Cloud is favored for its advanced features, geographic flexibility in load testing, and collaboration tools, despite being more costly. LoadRunner Professional is superior in protocol support and comprehensive testing capabilities, though it lacks cloud-based flexibility.
Features: LoadRunner Professional is best known for its extensive protocol support, including SAP, Java, and IoT, offering diverse application testing. Its scripting and analysis features, like auto-correlation and detailed reports, are powerful for developing sophisticated frameworks. LoadRunner Cloud provides scalable, cloud-based testing with rapid setup and user-friendly dashboards, facilitating the management of large-scale tests.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Professional users often face scripting complexity and high resource consumption, with a need for better integration with modern web technologies. LoadRunner Cloud, while scalable, could improve its initial configuration and analytical capabilities to match its standalone counterpart's depth.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Professional typically requires on-premises deployment, leading to limited scalability and higher upfront infrastructure costs. LoadRunner Cloud offers flexibility with Public, Private, and Hybrid Cloud deployment, enhancing accessibility and scalability. Both products provide robust customer support, but LoadRunner Cloud users appreciate the ease of access through community resources and a straightforward management interface.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Professional is expensive, with complex licensing that challenges small organizations, yet offers a high ROI through reusable assets and extensive protocol coverage. LoadRunner Cloud's pay-per-use model is potentially more economical under variable load conditions, though its price is still considered high by some. Both products provide ROI through performance issue detection and downtime reduction.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud); the analysis part is quite helpful, which is quite more descriptive than the other products.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) as it has led to time savings and a reduction in manual efforts while generating the load.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
The customer support for OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is very good.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The scalability of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is based on its cloud-native architecture, which demonstrates strong load handling capacity and stable protocol and script execution.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is a stable tool that demonstrates strong performance reliability.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
Offers fast customer support and SLA.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
The massive cloud scalability and fast design of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have helped me optimize performance, identify performance bottlenecks in my application, generate the traffic, and recognize performance reliability issues in my application.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well.
Its LoadRunner functionality allows us to record a solution's networking protocol and replay them.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
Overall, the installation was quite easy since OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is SaaS-based.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 13.6% |
| OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 7.8% |
| Other | 78.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.