Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #13, while OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 16.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,679 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Read 82 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

10,774 Views
8,727 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Akamai CloudTest and OpenText LoadRunner Professional are solutions in the performance testing category. Data comparisons suggest that Akamai CloudTest has the upper hand in pricing and support, whereas LoadRunner Professional stands out in feature comprehensiveness, deemed worth its cost by many users.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is well-integrated with cloud environments, offering real-time analytics, seamless cloud integration, and on-demand AWS integration. LoadRunner Professional supports a wide array of protocols, provides in-depth diagnostics capabilities, and excels in API testing with sophisticated analysis tools.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could improve its protocol support, expand its reporting features, and enhance custom scripting options. LoadRunner Professional needs better documentation for extending tool support, improved UI for TruClient, and streamlined integrations with third-party applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest features a straightforward deployment model, making it easier and quicker to implement with responsive customer service. LoadRunner Professional has a more complex deployment setup, but it compensates with robust customer support for troubleshooting and setup issues.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest offers more budget-friendly pricing, suited for smaller organizations and projects with limited budgets. LoadRunner Professional incurs higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through its vast feature set and strong enterprise-level capabilities, often chosen by larger enterprises for comprehensive testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is 16.8%, up from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	16.8%
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
Other	80.1%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Experience a decade of seamless performance with robust support

I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those points remain similar and applicable. For future updates, I would like to see the same features that people generally prefer. I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"The solution is very stable."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"I've always been impressed by the versatility and plain power of this testing tool."

"It has features for recording. The best feature with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is that there is very little bottleneck or overhead issues. With LoadRunner, you can spawn 2000 contributions for one machine."

"Scripting for web is faster and easier."

"For me as a user, the flexibility in different protocols and things like that which can be tested with the tool."

"In terms of ROI, LoadRunner does everything."

"I recommend LoadRunner Professional as it supports many protocols and applications and is very easy to set up and use."

"I am impressed with the tool's correlation function."

"It covers the most technology, is the most reliable, it gives us the most features."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

Cons

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"Compared to some other vendors, there is a lack of community support."

"Remote Load Generators has issues in identifying objects on dynamic web pages"

"I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients; it eats lots of memory, so usually, I have two or three load generators while I have the one controller."

"The tool needs to work on capture script feature."

"LoadRunner Professional is an expensive product."

"The price of this solution should be cheaper."

"We are going to continue to use the product in the future, I recommend this product. However, those who are looking for only REST-based on the API, I would recommend some other tool because of the cost. There are others available on the market."

"The debugging capability is difficult to use and should be improved."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The cost depends greatly on the needs of the testing engagement."

"Pricing depends on our choices because it depends on what type of protocol we are getting, what type of licensing we are getting, and what kind of relationships we have with HP and Micro Focus."

"When you compare the cost of other tools such as NeoLoad and LoadNinja, the cost of LoadRunner is on the expensive side. As a result, we are currently considering going with NeoLoad."

"It is competing with other products that may cost significantly less or may be available as open-source. Because of that it is relatively expensive."

"I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and is relatively expensive."

"LoadRunner Professional's licensing costs are on the higher side, apart from the Community Edition."

"The pricing model, especially when involving partners, could use some improvement."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	67

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I have mentioned many advantages about this product, but to discuss disadvantages or areas that could be improved, I would need to consult with my engineers who are working on it. So far I have not...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I work only with the performance testing tools and not with OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) for mobile and web applications. With performance testing, I am t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I can provide additional advice after consulting with my team. I am open to being contacted via email for any clarifications about my review. I rate OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (L...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 39% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

October 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

October 2026

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

October 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.