Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 15.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,432 Views
1,174 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Read 82 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

9,128 Views
7,394 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Akamai CloudTest and OpenText LoadRunner Professional are solutions in the performance testing category. Data comparisons suggest that Akamai CloudTest has the upper hand in pricing and support, whereas LoadRunner Professional stands out in feature comprehensiveness, deemed worth its cost by many users.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is well-integrated with cloud environments, offering real-time analytics, seamless cloud integration, and on-demand AWS integration. LoadRunner Professional supports a wide array of protocols, provides in-depth diagnostics capabilities, and excels in API testing with sophisticated analysis tools.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could improve its protocol support, expand its reporting features, and enhance custom scripting options. LoadRunner Professional needs better documentation for extending tool support, improved UI for TruClient, and streamlined integrations with third-party applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest features a straightforward deployment model, making it easier and quicker to implement with responsive customer service. LoadRunner Professional has a more complex deployment setup, but it compensates with robust customer support for troubleshooting and setup issues.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest offers more budget-friendly pricing, suited for smaller organizations and projects with limited budgets. LoadRunner Professional incurs higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through its vast feature set and strong enterprise-level capabilities, often chosen by larger enterprises for comprehensive testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is 15.6%, up from 13.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	15.6%
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
Other	81.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

KALLAN SHIBU

Assistant Director at Synapxe

Has enabled my team to identify bottlenecks effectively and deliver reliable performance analysis across projects

I have mentioned many advantages about this product, but to discuss disadvantages or areas that could be improved, I would need to consult with my engineers who are working on it. So far I have not heard of any significant issues. I can gather specific improvement suggestions from my architect and provide that information later.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The solution is very stable."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"I like the user interface. I like the way we can divide our scenarios and can tune them. The integration with the quality center is great. These features are really good."

"I am impressed with the tool's correlation function."

"LoadRunner helped identify bottlenecks during the testing phase in several instances especially before launch of major projects."

"The Analysis feature makes it easy to analyze cross-data and we can pin to the focus period."

"It is actually a very good tool because it will support almost all, if not all, industry-standard protocols, and it is also equipped with very nice reporting capabilities, which is why I like it."

"Available protocols."

"The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations."

"Paramterization and correlation are important features."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

Cons

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"The product is not stable and reliable in the version we are currently using."

"I also use the TrueClient feature for browser-based testing. I found the TrueClient feature to be a bit difficult to use and not very user-friendly for automating scripts."

"Instead of having too many graphs and tabs, use the analysis section to get a more simplified defect analysis."

"LoadRunner is a well-rounded, polished tool – but it does need more improvement when it comes to it application of load, more flexibility mid-test would be nice."

"It needs to be easier to use. I know LoadRunner so I think it's a tool that's difficult to understand."

"Some form of automation is needed in this product, whether it's integration with CI/CD or providing the facility to import JSON files, so that we can automatically create the scripts."

"The reporting feature in this tool needs to be improved. After using it, in my opinion it seems a little complicated in some aspects."

"Support for Microsoft Dynamics needs improvement."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The price is a bit on the high side, but it is still affordable."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and is relatively expensive."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of users."

"There is an annual license required to use Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional. There are not any additional costs other than the licensing fees to use it."

"There is a licensing cost that is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is a high price, I rate the solution a five."

"It is reasonable. We pay the cost, but we have everything. We have a big set of licenses for SAP and other applications. We have all kinds of licenses."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

15%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	67

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

The pricing should be reduced and made more competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I work only with the performance testing tools and not with OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) for mobile and web applications. With performance testing, I am t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 6% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 37% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

September 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

September 2026

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.