Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Akamai holds a 2.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

513 Views
371 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 83 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,340 Views
1,242 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 13, 2025

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Akamai CloudTest are performance testing platforms. CloudTest seems to have an advantage in deployment ease and cloud integration, while LoadRunner offers extensive protocol support.

Features: LoadRunner provides test management, extensive protocol support, and allows integration with various enterprise tools. Its script customization and scheduling features enhance flexibility in testing. Akamai CloudTest offers seamless cloud integration, real-time analytics, and live monitoring, enabling efficient scalability and improved performance analysis.

Room for Improvement: LoadRunner may improve by reducing setup time, simplifying real-time analytics, and enhancing its cloud capabilities. CloudTest could benefit from expanding protocol support, improving cost management for large-scale tests, and enhancing offline analysis features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner requires significant setup time but offers robust customer support. Its enterprise integration can be complex for new users. CloudTest offers simple cloud-based deployment with responsive support, providing users with easier initial configuration and system management.

Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner has high initial costs but delivers long-term value through its comprehensive testing capabilities, justifying expenses for organizations needing broad protocol support. CloudTest offers flexible pricing due to its cloud-based nature, making it potentially more cost-effective for businesses focusing on scalability and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 5.3%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

VictorHorescu

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The solution is very stable."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The most beneficial features of the solution are flexibility and versatility in their performance."

"The solution does support a wide range of technologies and protocols. Plus, two features, network virtualization, and service virtualization, are really helpful. Apart from that, the way they have their billing scenarios, like the execution, is very good."

"I like how you can make modifications to the script on LoadRunner Enterprise. You don't have to go into the IDE itself."

"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."

"Provides the performance of load test applications and reliably on good reporting."

"We haven't had an outage since we started using the solution."

"It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening"

"It's a very powerful tool."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"The product's scalability must be improved."

"I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected."

"We are expecting more flexible to use Jenkins in continuous integration going forward."

"The debugging feature needs to include graphs."

"The support team needs to be more coordinated."

"Sometimes, the code is not generated when we record the scripts in the backend."

"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."

"Micro Focus's technical support could be more responsive."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."

"They have a much more practical pricing model now."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"This solution can be expensive."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

In 2019, I was dealing with the costs of LoadRunner. While I don't remember the exact figures, JMeter being free and RPT being cheaper makes them attractive. The high cost of LoadRunner, in contras...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

While I don't see any issues with LoadRunner's functionality, the cost of the tool is a major factor. Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 39% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 16% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 12% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 36% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

March 2025

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

March 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Akamai

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

February 2025

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.