Akamai CloudTest vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and Tricentis are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #13, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Tricentis’s 14.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,679 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Tricentis NeoLoad

Read 68 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

8,518 Views
6,985 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Tricentis NeoLoad

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Tricentis NeoLoad are in the performance testing category, with NeoLoad having the upper hand due to its extensive features and perceived value.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is strong in large-scale test handling, real-time analytics, and seamless integration. Tricentis NeoLoad is known for its high scalability, ability to reuse scripts, and integration with CI/CD pipelines, providing broader testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance scalability, expand its script reuse options, and improve integration with modern CI/CD systems. Tricentis NeoLoad may improve its user interface, reduce learning curve complexities, and enhance script creation speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest provides straightforward deployment with exceptional customer service known for quick issue resolution. Tricentis NeoLoad offers flexible deployment options and comprehensive customer support that facilitates swift problem resolution, making it preferable for customers seeking deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest is praised for its competitive pricing and strong ROI due to its efficient capabilities. Tricentis NeoLoad, despite being more expensive, justifies its cost through high ROI linked to its advanced features and comprehensive testing capabilities, making it a worthwhile investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis NeoLoad

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad is 14.1%, up from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad	14.1%
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
Other	82.8%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

AnantJoshi

Senior Director Intelligent Automation at Truglobal

Performance testing has delivered diverse global retail loads and generates clear diagnostic reports

I did not notice any weak points or downsides in Tricentis NeoLoad except for the cost. Everything else is good with the tool. When I consider that service customers have to pay the cost for the load generation, I find that the cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"The solution is very stable."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."

"What I found best in Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's better with scripting and load test execution in the load testing environment compared to its competitors. The tool has a better design, scenarios, and model, which I find helpful. I also found the Result Manager a fascinating part of Tricentis NeoLoad because of the way it collates results and presents reports. The straightforward implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad, including ease of use, is also valuable to my team."

"It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing."

"This is a user-friendly and straightforward solution with a good support system."

"It’s a very powerful tool which meets all our load and performance testing requirements, along with very sophisticated monitoring tools and reports."

"It’s very easy for a person without any performance testing experience to use."

"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."

"The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pros

Cons

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."

"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols."

"It is easier to comprehend the analysis on its on-premise setup but not on its on-cloud setup."

"The rendering of heavyweighted applications can't be scripted via NeoLoad, so we have to use LoadRunner as an extra client."

"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the range of codeless scripting such as with terminal emulation apps."

"At times we have had issues with load generator agent stability, but tuning the heap and documented network hacks greatly reduced this."

"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."

More Tricentis NeoLoad cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We used a 60-day trial with ten hours of work per month."

"The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing."

"Its licensing cost is very less."

"The solution requires an annual license."

"NeoLoad now has a much more flexible licensing process."

"I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of pricing"

"NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."

"The tool's pricing is somewhat higher than licensed tools like LoadRunner. The approximate cost is around $25,000. There are no additional charges for maintenance or support. Everything is included in the package we have."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?

I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?

Tricentis NeoLoad use cases were for retail, specifically a US based retail customer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis NeoLoad?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 47% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 1% of the time

More Tricentis NeoLoad Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

October 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis NeoLoad

October 2026

Download Tricentis NeoLoad product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.

Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.

What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?

Team Collaboration: Enables simultaneous work across different locations.
Comprehensive Insights: Custom graph options for detailed analysis.
User-Centric Design: Simplifies scripting without extensive coding knowledge.
Protocol Support: Facilitates mobile, web, and cloud-based testing.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Jenkins, Tableau, and others.
Scalability and Monitoring: Supports real-time monitoring and API integration.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: More affordable than some competitors while offering scalable solutions.
Improved Testing Accuracy: Real-world simulation of multi-user scenarios.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports both on-premise and SaaS models.
Enhanced Application Performance: Monitors system behavior effectively.

Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

October 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.