OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and Tricentis NeoLoad are leading products in the performance testing category. LoadRunner Professional has a slight advantage with its extensive protocol support, making it adaptable for diverse applications. Meanwhile, NeoLoad is recognized for strong mobile and API support and a user-friendly, low-code testing approach.
Features: LoadRunner Professional's extensive protocol support makes it versatile in testing almost any application. It enables the creation of programmable scripts and offers sophisticated reporting features, simplifying complex performance scenarios. On the other hand, NeoLoad provides robust mobile and API support, a user-friendly interface with low-code testing, and impressive integration capabilities with other tools for enhanced adaptability.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Professional could simplify scripts for better user experience and improve integration with modern technologies, including enhanced cloud and mobile support. NeoLoad can improve its protocol support and integration services, further strengthening its mobile platform integration while reducing extensive customization needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Professional offers primarily on-premises deployment, allowing versatility in different environments with varying customer service effectiveness. In contrast, NeoLoad supports hybrid cloud deployments providing flexible testing solutions, though customer service ratings suggest the need for consistency improvements.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Professional is perceived as costly with a complex licensing model, but it offers substantial ROI through reduced downtime and enhanced performance quality. NeoLoad, meanwhile, stands out for its more competitive pricing and flexible licensing, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective performance testing solutions, with users noting its intuitive testing processes and satisfaction driven by the value offered.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
I can rate it around eight because I think they are much faster than OpenText or Micro Focus.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
For scalability, I can rate Tricentis NeoLoad around three.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
The cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
I would probably like to see some new functionalities for Tricentis NeoLoad, such as a converting mechanism.
The scripting language is quite comfortable for us since we are working with C and C++.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
I find that my team is using the features at Tricentis NeoLoad most effectively, as my role is to get that data out of the tool, and they do the analysis.
Tricentis NeoLoad excels at generating different kinds of loads.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 14.4% |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 11.6% |
| Other | 74.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 67 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.
Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.
What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
