

Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText Core Performance Engineering LoadRunner Cloud are notable competitors in performance testing tools. NeoLoad has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and user-friendliness, while LoadRunner Cloud shows strength in feature depth and protocol support.
Features: Tricentis NeoLoad offers simple script correlation, a user-friendly interface, and quick script development, integrating easily with other tools. It excels in complex test scenarios and mobile application recording. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud supports a wide range of protocols, includes robust analysis features, and offers extensive reporting capabilities, making it suitable for detailed performance testing.
Room for Improvement: Tricentis NeoLoad could enhance its protocol support, particularly for Citrix and SAP GUI applications, and improve its reporting features. LoadRunner Cloud can benefit from more flexible scripting options, improved analytics, and reduced pricing. Users also desire better integration with third-party tools and faster support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis NeoLoad supports deployment across various cloud environments but challenges post-acquisition have affected response times. LoadRunner Cloud also supports diverse cloud deployments and is praised for its excellent customer service and prompt issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Tricentis NeoLoad is more cost-effective, offering flexible pricing and quick ROI due to low setup costs and rapid script creation. LoadRunner Cloud’s higher pricing reflects its extensive features and protocol support, providing a strong ROI for users needing detailed analysis.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud); the analysis part is quite helpful, which is quite more descriptive than the other products.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) as it has led to time savings and a reduction in manual efforts while generating the load.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
The customer support for OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is very good.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The scalability of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is based on its cloud-native architecture, which demonstrates strong load handling capacity and stable protocol and script execution.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is a stable tool that demonstrates strong performance reliability.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
Offers fast customer support and SLA.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
The massive cloud scalability and fast design of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have helped me optimize performance, identify performance bottlenecks in my application, generate the traffic, and recognize performance reliability issues in my application.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well.
Its LoadRunner functionality allows us to record a solution's networking protocol and replay them.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 10.7% |
| OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 7.8% |
| Other | 81.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.
Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.
What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.