OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs RadView WebLOAD comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Radview are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5, while Radview is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 7.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to Radview’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 69% of Radview users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 47 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

5,499 Views
4,179 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

RadView WebLOAD

Read 9 RadView WebLOAD reviews

1,675 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

69% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

RadView WebLOAD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

RadView WebLOAD and OpenText Core Performance Engineering compete in performance testing. OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers superior features justifying its higher price.

Features: RadView WebLOAD is noteworthy for robust scripting with JavaScript, flexible test creation, and comprehensive analytics. OpenText Core Performance Engineering stands out for cloud integration, scalability, and extensive protocol support.

Room for Improvement: RadView WebLOAD could improve its cloud capabilities and scalability. Enhancing user interface intuitiveness and reporting features might also be beneficial. OpenText Core Performance Engineering could benefit from making its advanced analytics more user-friendly and improving network discrepancy configurations. Further enhancements in the analysis depth could also be considered.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers straightforward deployment due to its cloud-native design and strong customer service. RadView WebLOAD's on-premise option requires more setup but offers personalized support. OpenText's model eases deployment with reliable customer support for fast issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: RadView WebLOAD provides a competitive cost for setup, offering good ROI for small to mid-tier organizations. OpenText Core Performance Engineering justifies its higher investment with comprehensive features and high ROI potential for larger, cloud-focused environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RadView WebLOAD

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 7.5%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RadView WebLOAD is 3.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	7.5%
RadView WebLOAD	3.5%
Other	89.0%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Centralized cloud testing has improved global load generation and real-time performance insights

The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well. The cloud-based load generators in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have benefited my testing setup because we can generate the load across the globe, which was previously a little bit difficult on the on-premises version. The user interface in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is intuitive and this will be easy to communicate and collaborate amongst the team also because sharing the online URL with the team, they can simply check the analysis and everything.

Read full review

it_user1265766

Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.

IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated

You pay for the number of users that you're going to be utilizing. In order to scale up, you would have to pay for additional users, but for our use case, we're able to scale fairly easily. We have a license for 500, but we're using half of that for our initial workflow. For maintenance, as far as I'm aware, there's only one person really working on the maintenance of it and we only really have one user consistently using the software. He's a QA person. We don't have any plans to increase our usage. Even though we've had it for a while, we have a major push to start utilizing it more. I imagine we'll probably be using it and utilizing it across our QA team in the next year. We're in the process of determining whether we're going to keep it or not due to the fact that it is so expensive. That's why I've been researching alternatives for the RadView.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud ten out of ten."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests."

"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."

"The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything."

"The most useful features of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud include getting load through the Performance Center, which is part of the cloud version, where we can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times."

"The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center."

"From end-to-end, starting from creating the load scenarios, to running them, and then reporting, LoadRunner is the best tool."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"The solution is simple and useful."

"Technical support has been excellent, responsive, and helpful in trying to work through issues and questions."

"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting; it is interesting, intuitive, and we can do some parameterization."

"The analytics pack is probably one of the most powerful tools that I've seen."

"The tool itself is very viable for us."

"The ability to conceptualize the experience for users is great, the price as the bang for your buck is good, the user interface is quite user friendly, and the graphics make it easy to follow and are easy to identify."

"They are the best of all of the vendors I deal with, hands down."

More RadView WebLOAD pros

Cons

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD."

"Sometimes, you are utilizing one of the low generators, then all of a sudden if you discontinue from one project, it actually deletes the entire low generator."

"I think the report page could be improved, although we have used the reporting feature."

"We ran into some undocumented limits around the number of concurrent users."

"We did have some challenges with the initial implementation."

"The product price could be more affordable."

"Because it is a paid tool, its cost is very high."

"The cloud configuration setup and server access can be tricky, as we don't usually get direct access."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"It would be great, in addition to the load tool, it would be nice, if Radview offered a JavaScript based functional test tool as well."

"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

"They can improve in the reporting - the ability to generate custom reports."

"We did have an issue with some of the script working incorrectly in our higher environments."

"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."

"When it finds a problem with response times, it doesn't specify exactly where the problem actually is."

"We have had a lot of trouble with this solution, and it is actually adapted to our application."

"I would like to be able to edit a scenario instead of re-recording a scenario."

More RadView WebLOAD cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

"We purchased a license for two years."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows it is very high and very costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) can be improved by incorporating code improvements. I would add that it reduces the initial setup complexity, improves the learning curve op...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Flood vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 8% of the time

Original Software Qualify vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 7% of the time

More RadView WebLOAD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

September 2026

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Buyer's Guide

RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Download RadView WebLOAD product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

No data available

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

RadView WebLOAD is a robust load testing tool designed for agile web and mobile application development. It offers comprehensive testing capabilities to ensure application performance under varying traffic loads, meeting the demands of tech-savvy users.

RadView WebLOAD supports complex performance testing scenarios, making it indispensable for developers and QA teams. By simulating thousands of users, it helps identify potential bottlenecks before deployment. This tool provides detailed analytics and reporting, allowing teams to pinpoint issues and optimize application performance.

What are the standout features of RadView WebLOAD?

Load Generation: Efficiently simulate large-scale user traffic from multiple locations.
Script Creation: Flexible scripting using JavaScript for customizing test scenarios.
Real-time Monitoring: Track KPIs and diagnose issues during test execution.
Comprehensive Reporting: Access detailed reports and insights post-test to inform optimization strategies.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrate with CI/CD pipelines to enhance DevOps practices.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Performance Insights: Gain actionable insights for enhancing application performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduce downtime and post-deployment fixes, lowering operational costs.
Scalability: Supports testing under various load conditions ensuring scalability.
Improved User Experience: Prevent performance issues that could affect user satisfaction.
Robust Support: Access to quality customer support and resources for troubleshooting.

In industries such as e-commerce and finance, RadView WebLOAD helps manage high traffic volumes. Retailers use it to prepare for seasonal peaks, while financial institutions rely on it to ensure transaction efficiency. It's an asset for any industry aiming to enhance application reliability and user satisfaction.

Radview

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.