Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.1 out of 5

46 reviews
93% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) offers a scalable, cloud-based platform for extensive performance testing with up to ten thousand concurrent users. It centralizes configurations online, supports diverse protocols, and enables load generation in restricted regions. However, it has a steep learning curve, limited custom reports, integration challenges with CI/CD pipelines, and insufficient technical documentation, potentially hindering user independence and adaptability to other tools for security checks.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) centralizes everything online, allowing users to check configurations without physical presence.

It can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, unlike on-premise solutions.

Users can configure browser settings for various operating systems and versions without installing each version on every machine.

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud enables the use of load generators in countries where access is limited, allowing infrastructure creation on-demand for performance testing.

Its extensive protocol support accommodates diverse performance testing, eliminating the need for separate tools while providing relevant customer reports.

CONS

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) has a steep learning curve and complex initial setup, which is characteristic of the technology.

Custom reports are lacking as users are restricted to default reports that may contain irrelevant or missing data.

There are integration challenges with CI/CD pipelines, particularly around protocol limitations and database testing capabilities.

Integration with other tools is limited, which affects the ability to perform security checks alongside load testing.

Technical documentation needs to be more detailed, as current resources are not sufficient for users to self-serve without assistance.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Pros review quotes

Technical Sales at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Mar 28, 2018

It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users.

Read full review

Test manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

May 24, 2017

The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them.

Read full review

AK

Aditya Kattamuri

Senior Performance Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 14, 2019

Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore.

Read full review

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Snr Performance engineer

Sep 19, 2017

This solution is SaaS based so we can utilize cloud technology, which is less time consuming and saves a lot of of money.

Read full review

CS

IT Project Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 16, 2019

The most valuable feature is having load generators in countries where we don’t have access to them.

Read full review

JI

Database Leader at Skupos Inc.

Apr 23, 2020

The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.

Read full review

reviewer1405041

Technical Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Sep 9, 2020

The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.

Read full review

CM

ChowdhuryMahmud

Senior Performance Engineer at City of New York

Sep 21, 2020

The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.

Read full review

Abbasi Poonawala

Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank

Nov 19, 2023

The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I

Read full review

Sr. Technical Test Analyst at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 14, 2021

The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 30)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Cons review quotes

Technical Sales at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Mar 28, 2018

It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need.

Read full review

Test manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

May 24, 2017

I'd like to see more ability to dive more deeply into the configuration.

Read full review

AK

Aditya Kattamuri

Senior Performance Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 14, 2019

There is a steep learning curve for the product, too.

Read full review

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Snr Performance engineer

Sep 19, 2017

Sometimes, you are utilizing one of the low generators, then all of a sudden if you discontinue from one project, it actually deletes the entire low generator.

Read full review

CS

IT Project Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 16, 2019

An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries.

Read full review

JI

Database Leader at Skupos Inc.

Apr 23, 2020

Improvements to the reporting would be good.

Read full review

reviewer1405041

Technical Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Sep 9, 2020

I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.

Read full review

CM

ChowdhuryMahmud

Senior Performance Engineer at City of New York

Sep 21, 2020

There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.

Read full review

Abbasi Poonawala

Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank

Nov 19, 2023

I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check.

Read full review

Sr. Technical Test Analyst at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 14, 2021

We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 30)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

See all alternatives

Related questions

33

How does HPE StormRunner compare to tools from other providers?

9

Can you use HPE StormRunner Load as a service and what are the payment options?

23

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

30

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

33

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

20

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

47

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

34

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

32

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

71

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?