Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.1 out of 5

45 reviews
93% willing to recommend

2,023 followers

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) allows browser configuration across various operating systems without installations, supporting up to ten thousand users. It enables on-demand infrastructure and diverse protocol support, though it features a steep learning curve and integration challenges. With default reports lacking relevance and limited technical documentation, users often face self-service difficulties. Customer support delays further impact issue resolution, complicating deployment processes for tech buyers.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) offers the ability to configure browser settings for various operating systems and versions without needing installations.

It provides infrastructure on-demand for performance testing, eliminating the need for user-maintained infrastructure.

The scalability of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) supports up to ten thousand concurrent users in a cloud-based environment.

This cloud-based solution saves users time and money by avoiding the need for on-premise infrastructure.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) supports multiple protocols and diverse technology stacks, enhancing performance testing capabilities.

CONS

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) does not provide custom reports and relies on default reports that may contain irrelevant or missing data.

Challenges exist with CI/CD pipeline integration, especially concerning different protocols and containerizing applications.

Documentation is not technical enough, requiring deeper technical documentation for better self-service.

The support team sometimes provides delayed responses, with issues taking months to resolve, impacting projects negatively.

Scriptless automation and scripting capabilities require improvement, and deeper configuration insights are necessary.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Pros review quotes

MD

Sr. Technical Test Analyst at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 14, 2021

The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads.

Read full review

DP

Cloud Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 27, 2023

The beauty of LoadRunner Cloud is that we can use the load generator that is hosted by us on-premises, and we also have the option to use their hosted load generator. If it is a public-hosted application, we can also use their public-hosted load generator, but in our case, all our applications are hosted in our data center, so we are using the on-premise load generator. We have the option to deploy those load generators as we want.

Read full review

reviewer2297850

Performance & Analytics Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

It is feature-rich. It supports most protocols, which is important because I am in charge of a team at the bank, and we do performance testing for all kinds of different applications. We have tons of them. We even do video streams.

Read full review

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AK

Aditya Kattamuri

Senior Performance Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 14, 2019

Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore.

Read full review

Richard Dachowski

Senior Quality & Test Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 9, 2023

Both the professional and cloud versions of Micro Focus LoadRunner use the same scripting or programming to execute performance modeling operations. This feature allows users to use various programming languages such as Java, C, or C++, which can run within either of the two environments. This flexibility in the programming language is a strong point of the software.

Read full review

Abbasi Poonawala

Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank

Nov 19, 2023

The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I

Read full review

AB

Lead Performance Test Engineer at bol.com BV

Jun 27, 2021

The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover.

Read full review

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Aug 8, 2022

It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort.

Read full review

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

Jun 16, 2025

The most useful features of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud include getting load through the Performance Center, which is part of the cloud version, where we can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.

Read full review

Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group

Jun 3, 2024

A vital feature of the solution is its ability to compose realistic scenarios for performance testing

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 29)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Cons review quotes

MD

Sr. Technical Test Analyst at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 14, 2021

We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD.

Read full review

DP

Cloud Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 27, 2023

In terms of new features, they can natively integrate with Chaos engineering tools such as Chaos Monkey and AWS FIS. With LoadRunner, we can generate load, and if Chaos tools are also supported natively, it will help to get everything together.

Read full review

reviewer2297850

Performance & Analytics Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

Their documentation is not technical enough for us. We would like to have much deeper technical documentation so that we can self-serve without constantly having to go back to them and ask.

Read full review

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AK

Aditya Kattamuri

Senior Performance Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 14, 2019

There is a steep learning curve for the product, too.

Read full review

Richard Dachowski

Senior Quality & Test Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 9, 2023

One area of improvement in the software's support is the replaying of captured data within the development environment. It would be beneficial if the replay feature could accurately mimic what the actual application is doing for better analysis and testing.

Read full review

Abbasi Poonawala

Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank

Nov 19, 2023

I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check.

Read full review

AB

Lead Performance Test Engineer at bol.com BV

Jun 27, 2021

Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud.

Read full review

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Aug 8, 2022

CI/CD integration could be a little bit better. When there's a test and if you see that there are high response times in the test itself, it would be great to be able to send an alert. It would give a heads-up to the architect community or ops community.

Read full review

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

Jun 16, 2025

I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.

Read full review

Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group

Jun 3, 2024

Some improvements can be made to the solution's user interface

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 29)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

StresStimulus vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Tricentis Flood vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

StresStimulus vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Tricentis Flood vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

See all alternatives

Related questions

61

How does HPE StormRunner compare to tools from other providers?

2

Can you use HPE StormRunner Load as a service and what are the payment options?

36

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

17

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

11

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

8

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

35

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

35

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

6

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

138

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?