OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering and Tricentis NeoLoad compete in the performance testing category. LoadRunner is favored for its comprehensive features and global integration capabilities, while NeoLoad is preferred for ease of use and cost flexibility.
Features: OpenText LoadRunner is known for comprehensive reporting, global test execution, and integration with enterprise systems like Application Lifecycle Management, supporting a wide range of protocols for customized test setups. Tricentis NeoLoad is celebrated for user-friendly scripting, strong cloud integration, rapid test creation, and real-time monitoring, providing a cost-effective solution for efficient teams.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Enterprise could improve integration with open-source tools, cloud systems, and its reporting, and needs to address high resource consumption in some protocols. NeoLoad should expand protocol support, enhance integration with third-party tools, and improve documentation and reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Enterprise supports various environments including on-premises and cloud, but deployment can be complex, with mixed support experience. NeoLoad supports hybrid and multi-cloud setups with easier deployment and offers more reliable support with prompt service.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner can be expensive, especially for extensive testing needs, but users report high ROI for its capabilities. NeoLoad offers more budget-friendly and flexible licensing, appreciated for affordability while still delivering significant returns and cost savings.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
However, it remains quite stable.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 10.0% |
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.2% |
| Other | 83.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.
Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.
What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.
Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the range of mobile, web, and desktop apps.
Tricentis NeoLoad Features
Tricentis NeoLoad has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Tricentis NeoLoad Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis NeoLoad. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Tricentis NeoLoad stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its price, its user-friendly UX, its API support, and its scalability. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Patrik B., Technical Lead at a tech services company, writes, “The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it.”
A Global Delivery Head at a consultancy firm notes, “The API support is much better with this solution, compared with the competition. Pricing for it is also more affordable than its competitor. We have used Tricentis NeoLoad and we find it scalable.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
