

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Tricentis NeoLoad are competitors in the performance testing tools category. Based on feature comparison and ROI, LoadRunner has a slight edge due to its scalability and extensive protocol support.
Features: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is notable for its scalability, supporting tens of thousands of virtual users and a centralized platform for various testing needs. It excels in comprehensive analysis capabilities and offers extensive protocol support. Tricentis NeoLoad is recognized for its ease of use in scripting and load test execution, providing a user-friendly interface and strong API integration. NeoLoad also offers seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines and is effective in low-code environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise could improve by enhancing its cloud-based capabilities and integrating deeper with modern agile methodologies. Reporting and resource optimization require further development. Tricentis NeoLoad should focus on expanding its protocol support and improving integration with third-party tools. Stability of the GUI and support for complex protocols are areas needing enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise provides flexible deployment options across On-premises, Public Cloud, and Hybrid Cloud, although customer service needs improvement, especially post-transition from HP to OpenText. Tricentis NeoLoad supports On-premises and Hybrid Cloud configurations and is valued for consistent customer service, though improvements in licensing support are suggested.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise has a high initial cost but is considered to offer high ROI, particularly when multiple protocols are used due to its robust performance capabilities. Tricentis NeoLoad is more competitively priced and flexible, appealing to various business sizes, with users valuing its cost-effectiveness and comprehensive features.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
On a scale of 1 to 10 for the support of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I would rate it a 10.
BlazeMeter, compared to LoadRunner, is still scalable and expandable easily.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
I can rate it around eight because I think they are much faster than OpenText or Micro Focus.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
It is simple to scale.
For scalability, I can rate Tricentis NeoLoad around three.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very stable.
However, it remains quite stable.
From a stability point of view for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I would rate it as seven based on the version that we are using.
If OpenText could think about bringing AI features into the tool, it could save maximum time in scripting or make scripting effortless, particularly in correlation, which is where the complexity involved in script development exists.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
Regarding the features for different versions of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), it is not clear to me which features are correct for my Windows server or whether the functionality is appropriate for my infrastructure.
The cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
I would probably like to see some new functionalities for Tricentis NeoLoad, such as a converting mechanism.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) helps us to identify the hotspots from the applications during peak times through the LRE simulation.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
I have extensive control over the results and logs, with significant control over servers and injectors.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
I find that my team is using the features at Tricentis NeoLoad most effectively, as my role is to get that data out of the tool, and they do the analysis.
Tricentis NeoLoad excels at generating different kinds of loads.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 14.1% |
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 7.6% |
| Other | 78.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 76 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.
What are the essential features?In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.
Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.
Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.
What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.