OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Perforce is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 6.4% mindshare in PTT, compared to Perforce’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 85 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

4,542 Views
3,407 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

4,723 Views
756 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Perfecto compete in the field of application performance testing. LoadRunner Enterprise seems to have the upper hand thanks to its comprehensive protocol support and real-time monitoring capabilities, while Perfecto shines with its advanced mobile and cross-platform testing features.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is highlighted for its extensive protocol support, robust real-time performance monitoring, and high scalability, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. Perfecto stands out with its cloud-based lab facilitating seamless device and browser integrations, robust automation features, and real-time test analysis.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) could improve by enhancing cloud integration and simplifying its monitoring features, potentially with improved real-time dashboards. Perfecto might focus on improving accessibility testing features, bettering the responsiveness of its cloud lab, and enhancing its reporting and analytics for more predictive insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is more suited for on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, although it can face challenges with technical support responsiveness post-HP transition. Perfecto aligns well with public cloud deployments, offering prompt customer service through its partner network and effective deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is considered a costly tool but justifies its price through high ROI by preventing production failures. Its flexible licensing options, such as pay-as-you-go, provide affordability. Perfecto offers competitive pricing and is generally more affordable, presenting good value with its cross-platform testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (6th)

Perfecto

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (16th), Mobile App Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 6.4%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 3.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	6.4%
Perfecto	3.1%
Other	90.5%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support

The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.

Read full review

Roland Castelino

QA Lead at BMO Financial

Its reporting allows us to have a clear view regarding what tests have been executed

The most valuable would be their Live Stream analysis, where I can see the live analysis of all the executions on a single device or multiple devices as well as track them. The live analysis and reporting would be the single most valuable feature. We leverage Perfecto’s reporting and analytics a lot. From the CI Dashboard, it is mainly the status, which is the past, failure count, and time consumption, e.g., how much time did an average test or script take? Along with that, it provides the historical view compared to the previous result, e.g., am I a pass or fail? Also, the stack trace is very important. Whenever a pass occurs, we don't look beyond that. However, whenever a failure occurs, the stack trace information that it gives us is pretty critical for us when figuring out where failures lie. It gives a summary for the pass/fail count, total test count, the historical view, time consumption for each test as well as the total tests, and the stack rate of the failure. Perfecto's analytics are very important since we use them on a daily basis. We run our executions daily. After every execution, we pull information from the Perfecto reporting system and share that with our stakeholders. Having this information accurately reported is pretty important for us, so everybody is aware of the current status of the product. That way, we can evaluate the health of the product or environment against that which has been executed. Therefore, it helps make those real-time decisions and highlights the impact to the business. I found Perfecto to be pretty easy to use while executing against cross-platforms. The main reason is because the same script or test automation where we execute on multiple platforms has minimal changes that I need to do. Also, it is easy for me to set up an execution on one platform, then on another platform, either in parallel or one after the other. Parallel opportunities save me time. Once the execution has been completed across these different configurations, I can always check and compare, e.g., what are the differences and consistencies? We utilize Perfecto’s cloud-based lab to test across devices, browsers, and OSs. I use it occasionally for manual testing. Though, there are other team members who use it more frequently than I do. I use it mainly for executing my automated tests. We have the Perfecto lab, cloud devices, and machines. I can program my test to execute against any of those devices, which gives me more confidence in my product. I can compare and see how my product or application functionally behaves across these different devices and from a UI point of view, which helps me a lot. The device lab is extremely important to our testing operations. We rely on having multiple devices up and running all the time. Whenever we kick off an execution, there are multiple reasons why executions may get triggered: * CodeCommit * A scheduled job. * Might be on-demand by any stakeholder. We need the lab to be available, as we need devices up and running for executions to take place. Also, the devices help since they allow us to have parallel execution, and not just wait for a sequential device to become free and available. Therefore, volume is definitely key. It also gives us an opportunity to compare execution across platforms in that space. It is extremely important to you that the lab provides same-day access to new devices since we analyze that data every single day after execution. Perfecto provides their own framework called Quantum Framework. That is one option. The other option is, if I want to have my own framework, I can have a Java-based Maven project, take a Selenium library, AppiumLibrary, and REST Assured library, and utilize the open-source framework. It is easy for us to connect to Perfecto, no matter what framework we use, as long as it has these core libraries in it. I can design and structure it any way that I want. The execution will happen in Perfecto no matter what since they have support for these tools or libraries. It is pretty neat that way. We are not dependent on using just one particular framework to use Perfecto. While there are still some framework limitations, there is the opportunity to use multiple, different open-source frameworks, then pass the execution to Perfecto. We can use most frameworks, then design and craft it any way that we want, then just pass the execution to Perfecto.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very easy to set up and get running."

"For us, the features we value and use the most are web and HTTP support."

"We have eliminated a lot of production issues because we are able to test so many virtual users at once."

"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."

"We are able to connect and run tests from different locations with this tool."

"With LoadRunner, 80% of the cases will be supported."

"The product is good, and the concept is good as well."

"For our web applications, we are moving towards Performance Center, because it is more GUI and user-friendly, and with all the latest technologies."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

"Perfecto has affected our software quality in a good way; it has allowed us to catch our defects earlier, thus improving the quality of our applications."

"The automated test reporting functionality is the most valuable feature. We use the CI Dashboard. It's very important as it is the main reporting tool for our automated tests."

"The quality of our software has improved since we implemented this solution."

"I also like the reporting functions. We are constantly downloading these reports and sharing them with our final customers. They help us understand what kind of bugs are happening through the applications. The recording feature is handy because it lets us see a video of the process we run through the pipeline and discover the point at which the automation is breaking."

"Overall, it has definitely translated to cost savings and the reason is multifold."

"Perfecto's device lab has helped us to scale our testing and it has made testing easier for us."

"Overall, it's a great solution."

"In terms of cross-platform testing, they offer all of it, every device available in the market. It covers real scenarios that mimic production so that we don't miss out on any devices that our clients might be using to run the applications we develop. It's been great and very helpful."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."

"I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools."

"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product."

"In Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, I need to spend a lot of time training people, while on other low-code or no-code platforms, I need not invest that much time."

"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."

"From time to time, we encounter bugs that are unexpected from a 20-plus years old solution."

"New features have been added in latest version and need to be improved with the DevOps integration."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

"It is slow compared to physical device testing. The interactive speed could be improved."

"On the analytics side, Perfecto is in need of improvement."

"When using devices on the cloud, it lags quite a bit at times. I know that these are real devices that are being projected on our laptop screens and monitors, but if the speed could be improved, that would be good."

"There could be some improvements done on the interface. At times, there has been a bit of a struggle when finding things on the interface. A UI revamp would be a better option in future. That UI hasn't changed much in a long time, so I think they could just make it a bit better so that people could find stuff easily and intuitively."

"We don't use Perforce's BlazeMeter with Perfecto. From my perspective, it's not really relevant."

"Its performance should be improved. Anything to speed up the user interface would be a great help. We've had a lot of pain with their migration from a product UI that was based on Adobe Flash to the new product that is based on HTML5. Migrations like that seemed to be very painful and not a real smooth process. We're still sort of recovering from that migration from old technology to new, and we haven't got all the functionality ported over that we used to have on the old UI."

"So, overall, I would rate Perfecto a seven out of ten because sometimes, we also have lagging with some of the devices. We get error messages, but we're not quite sure what's causing them."

"I'm hoping that Perfecto will come up with browser testing as well because it would be easier to access it."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution should decrease its price."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"The price is really steep. It's an enterprise-level tool."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	74

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Regarding negative sides or areas for improvement, I do not see any disadvantages so far. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) might have some drawbacks, but I did no...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

I always consider the purposes and use cases from an enterprise version perspective as a user of the product.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 6% of the time

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 11% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 9% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

HeadSpin vs Perfecto

Compared 3% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

June 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

June 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.

What are the essential features?

Ease of Scripting: Simplifies the creation of test scripts.
Protocol Support: Handles a wide range of protocols for diverse testing needs.
Scalability: Efficiently scales up to meet the demands of global testing teams.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of use across the organization.
Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights for performance analysis.
Test Scheduling: Offers flexible options for executing tests.
Integration: Seamlessly works with other enterprise tools to enhance functionality.
Virtual Users: Efficiently generates and manages virtual user environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Resource Optimization: Allows multiple users to conduct tests globally, optimizing resources.
Improved Management: Enhances project management through centralized testing platforms.
Predictive Insights: Simulates load responses and detects bottlenecks.
Scalability Assurance: Ensures applications handle thousands of users efficiently.

In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.

OpenText

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.