OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Perforce is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 7.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Perforce’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 86 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

5,878 Views
4,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

5,605 Views
1,121 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Perfecto compete in the field of application performance testing. LoadRunner Enterprise seems to have the upper hand thanks to its comprehensive protocol support and real-time monitoring capabilities, while Perfecto shines with its advanced mobile and cross-platform testing features.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is highlighted for its extensive protocol support, robust real-time performance monitoring, and high scalability, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. Perfecto stands out with its cloud-based lab facilitating seamless device and browser integrations, robust automation features, and real-time test analysis.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) could improve by enhancing cloud integration and simplifying its monitoring features, potentially with improved real-time dashboards. Perfecto might focus on improving accessibility testing features, bettering the responsiveness of its cloud lab, and enhancing its reporting and analytics for more predictive insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is more suited for on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, although it can face challenges with technical support responsiveness post-HP transition. Perfecto aligns well with public cloud deployments, offering prompt customer service through its partner network and effective deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is considered a costly tool but justifies its price through high ROI by preventing production failures. Its flexible licensing options, such as pay-as-you-go, provide affordability. Perfecto offers competitive pricing and is generally more affordable, presenting good value with its cross-platform testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Perfecto

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), Mobile App Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 7.1%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 3.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	7.1%
Perfecto	3.6%
Other	89.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vikram Katta

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Performance testing has supported web app peak analysis but needs better setup and smarter scripting

Regarding points for improvement for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I see that features are not being fully developed yet. If OpenText could think about bringing AI features into the tool, it could save maximum time in scripting or make scripting effortless, particularly in correlation, which is where the complexity involved in script development exists. If any AI features could replace or eliminate more manual work on the correlation part, that is where we could see a game-changing improvement for the tool. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) can be positioned very well in the market. However, I see that the basic correlations are only being handled by the autocorrelation engine in the LoadRunner tool, and I would expect a few improvements to handle even complex correlation problems so that the tool can be appropriately positioned compared to their peers.

Read full review

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can test a huge variety of applications, not just web-based systems, but SAP, Oracle, web services, pretty much anything out in the market place, but it's mobile-based testing."

"The main features are the ability to customize the product configuration and the customization to adapt with the customer environment, additionally, the product flexibility and stability are also valuable."

"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."

"The user interface is fine."

"Our customers think of the following benefits as ROI of using HP Performance Center: Reducing downtime in operations phase that may come due to load on system by fixing or customizing their application to afford the maximum number of concurrent users they expect Prior knowledge of their system limitation and its break point, may let them take precautions steps at application server or network level to prohibit overload traffic that may crash their system."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is easy to use and has flexibility that allows it to be used on a variety of applications."

"It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users."

"We have Performance Center as a platform to share with others that don't do performance testing full-time, so that they in an agile fashion, on demand can go ahead and get real issue-finding testing done; then to go ahead and have that pulled into trending reports so that even subtle differences or trends over time are found and not just game-changing defects."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

"Perfecto has affected our software quality in a good way. It has allowed us to execute on-demand and on-choice. We also track the number of issues that we find in the product. Every single day, we tag the issues that we found. For example, if something was found by automation, that means it was found by a Perfecto execution. Over time, we realized the real value in tracking those numbers. We can see now that we have clearly been finding issues earlier. It has allowed us to catch our defects earlier, thus improving the quality of our applications."

"When the scripts are stable, Perfecto is awesome."

"It saves on the cost and effort of having to maintain our own virtual testing environment. Even our onshore team is not in the city that we work in, so that helps a lot. Even if we didn't invest a lot in getting multiple devices, having to share those devices would become a hassle."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is that it covers all types of devices on the market allowing you to test different versions of an operating system."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides."

"In terms of Perfecto's ability to perform cross-platform testing, I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"Mobile testing is the most valuable feature as it has reduced dependency on physical devices. We are located offshore and we don't have the physical devices, and shipping physical devices after every new release would be a difficult task. But with Perfecto, it is easy."

"Using the device lab has definitely helped us to scale our testing operations."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."

"After they get over the acquisition, the first improvement is going to be tailoring it for their existing stack of other products. How would LoadRunner work for Documentum? How would it work for Business Network? How would it work for other apps? They can have a pre-package or a guide because they are all in the same family as opposed to being outside."

"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."

"On the newer versions, I think the bleeding edge is still being worked on."

"When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns."

"Almost all the areas improve drastically with each version; however, the correlation of scripts, analysis and reporting can be further improved. Their technical support could also be improved."

"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise doesn't support some mainframe protocols. We had to build scripts to access the interface."

"The price has skyrocketed, and to stay competitive, they need to reduce the licensing costs."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

"I'm hoping they can support on-premises instances. We have been working on a JIRA integration with Perfecto—and I'm extremely impressed that they have that—but at this time they're not supporting onsite JIRA instances, which is what we have."

"Its performance should be improved. Anything to speed up the user interface would be a great help. We've had a lot of pain with their migration from a product UI that was based on Adobe Flash to the new product that is based on HTML5. Migrations like that seemed to be very painful and not a real smooth process. We're still sort of recovering from that migration from old technology to new, and we haven't got all the functionality ported over that we used to have on the old UI."

"We don't use Perforce's BlazeMeter with Perfecto. From my perspective, it's not really relevant."

"The monitoring features, in particular network traffic monitoring, could be improved."

"So, overall, I would rate Perfecto a seven out of ten because sometimes, we also have lagging with some of the devices. We get error messages, but we're not quite sure what's causing them."

"Going by the dashboard or analytics capabilities that Perfecto or Perforce is looking to offer in its roadmap, it will certainly help if they also cater to executing and enabling decision-making, rather than just focusing on standard testing metrics such as execution, efficiency, and defect rate. These are good metrics, but they don't necessarily enable decision-making for SLTs. Any improvements in the dashboards and reporting tools should focus on metrics or SLAs that can help with decision-making."

"We've had a couple of issues lately with videos not loading or browsers dying after some execution, although that happens very rarely."

"One improvement would be speed of execution. If it is an iOS native app, we have noticed that the speed is a bit slower. Perfecto might need to make some improvements in this area."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high."

"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."

"The price is a bit too high."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"The price is really steep. It's an enterprise-level tool."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

My use case for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is related to enterprise twenty six, which we are going to upgrade now. We focus on web applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

September 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.

What are the essential features?

Ease of Scripting: Simplifies the creation of test scripts.
Protocol Support: Handles a wide range of protocols for diverse testing needs.
Scalability: Efficiently scales up to meet the demands of global testing teams.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of use across the organization.
Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights for performance analysis.
Test Scheduling: Offers flexible options for executing tests.
Integration: Seamlessly works with other enterprise tools to enhance functionality.
Virtual Users: Efficiently generates and manages virtual user environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Resource Optimization: Allows multiple users to conduct tests globally, optimizing resources.
Improved Management: Enhances project management through centralized testing platforms.
Predictive Insights: Simulates load responses and detects bottlenecks.
Scalability Assurance: Ensures applications handle thousands of users efficiently.

In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.

OpenText

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.