Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.2 out of 5

85 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) offers a centralized platform for performance testing with versatile capabilities and integration with tools like Dynatrace and Splunk for enhanced monitoring. It supports a wide range of applications but has high costs and challenges with technical support and integration. The tool demands resource optimization for certain protocols and faces installation issues, despite its benefits in scalability and detailed analytics for enterprise-level testing.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides a centralized platform for performance testing, offering ease in upgrading and supporting a wide range of applications and protocols.

The tool allows for easy scaling of virtual users and provides detailed reporting capabilities, making it valuable for enterprise-level testing and performance evaluation.

Integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace and Splunk enhances its monitoring capabilities, offering quick setup for comprehensive performance analysis.

Users appreciate the versatility and flexibility in the testing environment, allowing for efficient load, stress, and automation testing across various scenarios.

The detailed analytics and reporting features provide significant insights, ensuring robust test coverage and performance evaluation, resulting in measurable returns on investment.

CONS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) has high costs, often driving users towards more affordable open-source alternatives.

Technical support is reportedly uncoordinated and has degraded compared to when the product was under HP's ownership.

There are challenges with integrations, notably with cloud-based load generators and third-party products.

Resource optimization is necessary, particularly for the TruClient protocol which consumes excessive memory.

Users experience various installation issues, requiring frequent reinstallation attempts and adjustments across different machines.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Pros review quotes

Director of QA at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 11, 2014

The features I feel were most valuable were the reporting capabilities, the scheduling, and the ability to execute tests from anywhere.

Read full review

Software Developer at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 26, 2015

We have eliminated a lot of production issues because we are able to test so many virtual users at once.

Read full review

RS

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 28, 2015

Single license can be used optimally in different time zones for 300% ROI

Read full review

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Owner at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Oct 8, 2015

HP has very masterfully re-engineered this tool and integrated it with Application Lifecycle Management to create one of the most seamless project management suites I've used in years.

Read full review

Test Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 11, 2015

It is a great product that provides one with an extensive amount of functionality.

Read full review

Senior IT Service Management Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Oct 15, 2015

Our customers think of the following benefits as ROI of using HP Performance Center: Reducing downtime in operations phase that may come due to load on system by fixing or customizing their application to afford the maximum number of concurrent users they expect Prior knowledge of their system limitation and its break point, may let them take precautions steps at application server or network level to prohibit overload traffic that may crash their system.

Read full review

Performance Test Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 19, 2015

Previously, we had different physical machines for each controller, and then we shifted to Performance Center, which allows users to log into a single instance and manage all other controllers from there.

Read full review

Portfolio Testing Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 21, 2015

This helps us to uncover some very high and critical performance-related defects, and keeping almost zero production issues related to the performance of applications since then.

Read full review

Application Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 23, 2015

The built-in feature of Performance Center that does this, has made allocation of resources much, much easier.

Read full review

QA Lead at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 23, 2015

Enterprise-level load tests have a great analysis module for results.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 51)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Cons review quotes

Director of QA at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 11, 2014

The initial setup was complex, but we were helped every step of the way by our NRCE (Named Response Center Engineer).

Read full review

Software Developer at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 26, 2015

Not as fast as I would like, but they work with our customers in addition to working with us which is great because we don’t always have to be involved.

Read full review

RS

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 28, 2015

Deletion of collating test results by admin access only.

Read full review

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Owner at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Oct 8, 2015

Communication between load testing hosts and components is very complex and sometimes fragile, making manual intervention still too often necessary should an anomaly occur during testing.

Read full review

Test Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 11, 2015

I think some enhanced support, be it online or documentation, would be appreciated.

Read full review

Senior IT Service Management Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Oct 15, 2015

Running virtual users especially with a huge number is a very challenging task. The load generators may over utilize its resources (CPU/ memory) due to improper default configurations, or improper use of LoadRunner and Performance Center.

Read full review

Performance Test Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 19, 2015

It was a bit complex in terms of administration but we got help from technical people.

Read full review

Portfolio Testing Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 21, 2015

Almost all the areas improve drastically with each version; however, the correlation of scripts, analysis and reporting can be further improved. Their technical support could also be improved.

Read full review

Application Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 23, 2015

Browser compatibility. IE is no longer the only browser out there, so providing users the choice of what browser to use would be great!

Read full review

QA Lead at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 23, 2015

The price is quite high. It also has expensive licenses, and product support.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 51)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

See all alternatives

Related questions

31

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

35

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

21

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

47

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

34

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

32

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

75

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?

62

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

42

Specflow vs Selenium

46

What are the best performance testing tools?