

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and ReadyAPI compete in the software testing tools category. OpenText LoadRunner seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and advanced analysis capabilities, but ReadyAPI stands out for its ease of use and integration with CI/CD tools.
Features: OpenText LoadRunner offers centralized performance testing, extensive protocol support, and in-depth analytics essential for complex, large-scale projects. It also features an advanced scripting capability and scalability to support numerous virtual users. ReadyAPI provides a unified platform for API testing that includes functional, load, and security testing. Its user-friendly interface, ease of learning, and integration features make it attractive for teams focusing on rapid API development.
Room for Improvement: OpenText LoadRunner needs better cloud integration, user support, and a more flexible pricing model. Issues with performance under certain conditions and complex features also require attention. ReadyAPI should enhance its support for large collaborative projects and expand protocol support. Pricing flexibility and additional load testing features are areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers flexible deployment options across environments but faces configuration challenges. Customer service is reasonable but could improve in responsiveness. ReadyAPI is praised for user-friendly deployment and supportive customer service, though its licensing structure can be complex.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText LoadRunner is expensive with high licensing fees, which hampers accessibility for smaller teams. However, it delivers significant ROI in large environments by preventing costly downtimes. ReadyAPI offers a flexible pay-for-what-you-use pricing model, which matches its modular nature, providing valuable ROI though it is more expensive than open-source alternatives.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
However, it remains quite stable.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is a versatile tool for creating multiple testing frameworks and validating various parameters seamlessly.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.4% |
| ReadyAPI | 3.1% |
| Other | 90.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 74 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.
What are the essential features?In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.
ReadyAPI stands out for its API testing capabilities and integration with development tools like Jira and Git. Its user-friendly interface and automation with Groovy scripting make it a suitable, efficient choice for developers aiming for seamless project management and test execution.
ReadyAPI presents a comprehensive suite for API testing, supporting functional, performance, and security tasks with minimal coding required. It offers robust integration with tools such as Postman and CI/CD processes, enabling users to manage and automate testing scenarios efficiently. Despite its strengths, users notice limitations in performance and cloud integration, especially in scalability and test management. While it facilitates data-driven testing through Excel and supports on-premise and cloud environments, ReadyAPI could benefit from improved reporting and simpler scripting processes. Its interface and GitHub integration would further enhance its adaptability for larger projects and diverse applications.
What are ReadyAPI's main features?ReadyAPI is principally leveraged by industries that require precise API testing capabilities, spanning functional, performance, and security assessments. Its ease of integrating with CI/CD tools and ability to manage backend APIs make it an ideal choice in sectors that prioritize automation and reliability in testing processes. Companies operating within on-premise and cloud environments benefit from its support for diverse testing needs and scenarios, ensuring improved testing proficiency and response validation.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.