ReadyAPI Test and ReadyAPI compete in the API testing category, with both offering robust capabilities for SOAP, REST, and JDBC protocols. ReadyAPI seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive integration options, providing a more seamless testing experience across different environments.
Features:ReadyAPI Test is known for Groovy scripting, SQL injection, and the ease of project and test suite setup. It effectively manages multiple test cases swiftly. ReadyAPI supports data-driven testing, potent reporting, and analytics, making it ideal for larger projects requiring comprehensive test coverage. Additionally, it offers extensive integration with various environments and systems.
Room for Improvement:ReadyAPI Test could enhance its graphical reporting features and improve stability and scalability. Customer support response times need enhancement. ReadyAPI would benefit from improved cloud integration and performance in load testing, along with better version control and integration with other tools. Both tools could refine their user interface for ease of use and support broader protocols beyond SOAP and REST.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Both ReadyAPI Test and ReadyAPI are primarily deployed on-premises, with ReadyAPI also offering public cloud options. ReadyAPI customer service is proactive but could improve given its costs. ReadyAPI Test provides solid support, with documentation and community forums available to users.
Pricing and ROI:ReadyAPI Test is deemed expensive, though it offers strong ROI through time-saving and productivity gains. ReadyAPI's pricing is similarly high but reasonable for its comprehensive features and flexibility to purchase additional components. Both tools report good ROI by enhancing efficiency and developer productivity.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
