OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs k6 Open Source comparison

k6 and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. k6 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. k6 holds a 4.5% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of k6 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

914 Views
695 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 85 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,305 Views
1,775 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering and k6 Open Source compete in the performance testing category. OpenText may hold an advantage in enterprise scenarios due to its comprehensive features, whereas k6 is more suitable for smaller projects because of its simplicity.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering provides robust integrations, in-depth performance analytics, and support for various protocols, catering to complex enterprise needs. k6 Open Source offers a modern scripting interface, ease of script creation, and effective cloud-native support, which benefits agile and DevOps environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: k6 Open Source's lightweight and cloud-native design supports easy deployment and quick start-up, with its open-source nature adding flexibility. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering involves a structured setup that suits larger organizations with dedicated IT resources. k6 offers community support, whereas OpenText provides enterprise-level customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering entails higher initial costs due to its extensive features and support, offering significant long-term ROI for large-scale operations. k6 Open Source is more cost-effective with minimal setup expenses, providing substantial initial ROI advantages for smaller teams or beginners in performance testing.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

k6 Open Source

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (9th)

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of k6 Open Source is 4.5%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 6.5%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	6.5%
k6 Open Source	4.5%
Other	89.0%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ArtemCheremisin

Performance Test Engineer at BETBY

Lighter on the RAM and has native Grafana support

The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process. Recently, I had a case where I was using another tool, and there wasn't enough memory for it because it required more RAM. k6 Open Source, on the other hand, is lighter and doesn't have a UI, which is beneficial. An engineer I was training could use k6 Open Source scripts even without my help. The tool is more efficient and has native support with Grafana, as both are developed by the same company. This integration enhances monitoring and loss ratio tracking. Thanks to its intelligent GUI, k6 Open Source's design is simpler, particularly for complex scenarios. When we need to manage hundreds of thousands or millions of transactions per minute, the solution becomes a game-changer compared to JMeter.

Read full review

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support

The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"The tool is very easy to set up and get running."

"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."

"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."

"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."

"Our main use case for the product was load and stress testing. It helped us put the system under stress by injecting in multiple users, such as 5,000 users."

"The most beneficial features of the solution are flexibility and versatility in their performance."

"The solution offers helpful guidelines and has good documentation."

"The most valuable aspect of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the overall support it has for a lot of different applications and defined domains."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"We'd like the product to include protocol identifiers whenever a tester wants to test a new application."

"Canned reports are always a challenge and a question with customers because customers want to see sexy reports."

"Micro Focus's technical support could be more responsive."

"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."

"When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns."

"I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools."

"In Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, I need to spend a lot of time training people, while on other low-code or no-code platforms, I need not invest that much time."

"From time to time, we encounter bugs that are unexpected from a 20-plus years old solution."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"We purchased the license via SAP."

"ROI is 200%."

"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."

"The tool is very expensive."

"They have a much more practical pricing model now."

"The price is really steep. It's an enterprise-level tool."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Media Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering k6 Open Source?

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

The price of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), including pricing, licensing, and setup cost, is reasonable. It is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

Comparisons

BlazeMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 9% of the time

Akamai CloudTest vs k6 Open Source

Compared 7% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Silk Performer vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

January 2026

Download k6 Open Source product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

January 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

Load Impact

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.