IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #19, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 2.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

883 Views
283 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 85 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,518 Views
1,939 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering and IBM Rational Test Workbench compete in the performance testing category. IBM Rational Test Workbench appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features.

Features: OpenText shines with robust load generation, test flexibility, and comprehensive protocol support. IBM boasts strong integration capabilities, seamless collaboration, and extended user testing scenarios, offering a distinct advantage in integration features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText can improve in integration with third-party tools, advanced reporting, and enhancing its user interface. IBM could benefit from more competitive pricing, a simpler deployment model, and streamlined initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. IBM offers extensive deployment options suited to varied environments and comprehensive support services that enhance user confidence.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers attractive setup costs with quick ROI perception. IBM requires a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term returns through its extensive feature set, making it a wise choice for enterprises seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (15th), Test Automation Tools (27th)

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 2.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 6.2%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	6.2%
IBM Rational Test Workbench	2.1%
Other	91.7%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support

The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"The tool is very easy to set up and get running."

"The solution offers helpful guidelines and has good documentation."

"What we call the LoadRunner analysis is the most useful aspect of the solution."

"I like how you can make modifications to the script on LoadRunner Enterprise. You don't have to go into the IDE itself."

"We can book load generators."

"It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users."

"Creating the script is very easy and user friendly."

"It has offered me some reliability against other products, like JMeter or some other tools."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."

"OpenText needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."

"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."

"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"Currently, when we try open LRE we encounter cookie banner issues. However, I'm not sure if it is within the enterprise solution or with the vendors."

"I think better or more integration with some of the monitoring tools that we're considering."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise needs to add more features for Citrix performance-based applications testing. This was one of the challenges we observed. Additionally, we experienced some APIs challenges."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high."

"We purchased the license via SAP."

"The price is a bit too high."

"The tool is very expensive."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Regarding negative sides or areas for improvement, I do not see any disadvantages so far. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) might have some drawbacks, but I did no...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 9% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Silk Performer vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 6% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

February 2026

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

January 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

February 2026

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.