IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Postman Enterprise comparison

IBM and Postman are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #14, while Postman is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. IBM holds a 1.8% mindshare in APIT, compared to Postman’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Postman users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

732 Views
278 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Postman Enterprise

Read 65 Postman Enterprise reviews

4,193 Views
2,977 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Postman Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

IBM Rational Test Workbench and Postman Enterprise are notable competitors in software testing solutions. Postman Enterprise leads with more advanced features, outweighing its higher pricing.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench provides extensive automation capabilities, integration with diverse environments, and comprehensive testing options. Postman Enterprise, however, targets collaborative API lifecycle management, offers a user-friendly design, and streamlines API workflows, enhancing team collaboration.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench could benefit from reducing setup complexity and enhancing its user interface. It also requires simplified reporting features. Postman Enterprise may improve by integrating with more third-party tools, offering offline functionalities, and enhancing its API testing documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Test Workbench is known for its complex setup and strong support, which ensures smooth integration into workflows. Postman Enterprise shines with its cloud-based model, minimal deployment needs, and effective customer service for swift support and implementation.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench offers competitive prices with lower initial costs, potentially yielding quicker ROI. Postman Enterprise, despite a higher price point, is valued for its feature set that provides substantial long-term benefits, leading to a higher ROI through improved productivity and API efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in API Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (18th), Test Automation Tools (31st)

Postman Enterprise

Ranking in API Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (8th), API Monitoring Software (1st), AI Software Development (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 1.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman Enterprise is 9.8%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Postman Enterprise	9.8%
IBM Rational Test Workbench	1.8%
Other	88.4%

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

TOMISLAV SOKAC

API Integration Engineer at Airbnb

Automated testing optimizes API workflow and collaboration

Since I am using the free tier, one improvement would be to increase the number of requests you can send in a short time period. Currently, if I send 200-300 requests in a short period, Postman Enterprise requires a 30-second wait before sending another bundle of requests unless you upgrade to a higher tier. Secondly, Postman Enterprise sometimes takes several minutes to load the whole workspace. With 2,000-3,000 requests in a workspace, it can take a minute or two to load all requests. When creating a new workspace and moving requests between workspaces, depending on internet speed, it can take a longer period to copy those requests or workspace from one place to another.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."

"Postman is easy to use and enables us to test all possible API testing scenarios."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Collections."

"We use it for REST API testing. Feature-wise, it is pretty lightweight. It is pretty fast, and we don't have to do a lot of things. We can just simply go and post our endpoint, and it gives different kinds of authorizations. We usually use authentication 2.0, which is the most common industry practice. So, it has the support for authorization through 2.0."

"Simple to use and you can easily store your projects."

"Postman uses the DRY framework of JavaScript and that framework is easy and a good way to put assertions on responses."

"The environment variables are a valuable feature because I can easily switch them and see all the developments in different cycles and stages."

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"The scalability of the solution can be improved."

"Postman could be improved by providing options for performance testing of APIs."

"They should provide more specific documentation on configuration."

"If there is any way to have a record and playback feature through UI, as we do in Selenium and IDEs such as Eclipse, it would be great."

"Postman does not have a check-in balance. Essentially what I mean by that is if there is something that is already configured on a particular device, it just overrides it without checking whether you really want to override it or not."

"Integration should be improved with our continuation system because we use Azure DevOps separately."

"The management of endpoints' headers sometimes conflicts with APIs that require information in the body, leading to difficulties."

"It should be able to check the records and compare them to the regression testing more on the automation side."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"I use the tool's free version."

"I am using the free option."

"We are using its free version."

"We are using the free version that is available."

"It is free."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."

"I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."

More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

University

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Postman?

The product is easy to implement.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

Postman is much cheaper than the other tools. I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options. On a per-pers...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 12% of the time

Perfecto vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 9% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

January 2026

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

Postman Enterprise

January 2026

Download Postman Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

No data available

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.

What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?

Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

Postman

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.