

MuleSoft API Manager and Postman Enterprise both compete in the API management category. MuleSoft appears to have the upper hand for enterprises due to its robust feature set tailored for managing complex integrations.
Features: MuleSoft API Manager excels with API management, policy management, and integration with numerous connectors, ideal for managing complex microservices and enterprise security. Users value its stability and comprehensive tools for API deployment. On the other hand, Postman Enterprise is praised for its ease of use in testing and validating APIs. Its intuitive interface supports collections, automation, and environment variable handling, making it user-friendly, especially for testing needs.
Room for Improvement: MuleSoft API Manager could enhance its automation capabilities, streamline complexity, and improve analytics without extra costs. It also requires more comprehensive support for microservices and a more intuitive user interface. Postman Enterprise could benefit from advancing its data-driven testing, simplifying the user interface, and enhancing documentation to aid new users, as its limitations are more about broadening its feature sets and ease of use in sophisticated integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft API Manager supports Private Cloud, Public Cloud, Hybrid Cloud, and On-premises deployments, meeting diverse enterprise needs, though customer service quality varies. Postman Enterprise offers similar deployment options and is noted for its proactive customer service, with quick response times and effective support resolutions. While MuleSoft focuses on detailed enterprise integrations, Postman is favored for its usability and excellent customer support.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft API Manager has a high cost with per-core pricing and possible additional expenses for connectors and analytics. Users justify the price with substantial ROI from reduced integration efforts and quicker market access for complex systems. Postman Enterprise, however, attracts budget-conscious users with its mainly open-source offerings and free versions. Although its enterprise version incurs costs, they remain reasonable. MuleSoft offers more significant long-term ROI for extensive API management, whereas Postman suits those prioritizing efficient API testing without substantial expense.
This iPaaS platform with CloudHub eliminates variable infrastructure-related costs and saves enterprises on connectivity and operations costs, as everything comes bundled from the MuleSoft side.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
If bug fixing is required for downtimes or issues, we receive prompt support with alternative solutions or workarounds.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Regarding availability, especially with iPaaS solutions, they guarantee 99.99%.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
The major challenge they face is the high pricing, which has become notable especially since they transitioned from a VCore to a usage-based subscription.
The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it.
The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
In MuleSoft API Manager, I find features like throttling and security to be the most valuable, as these are the things we use and configure as part of our deployments.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| MuleSoft API Manager | 4.5% |
| Postman Enterprise | 1.6% |
| Other | 93.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Mulesoft API Manager is the portion of the Anypoint Platform that is used for the designing, building, managing, and publishing of APIs. Anypoint Platform uses Mule as its core runtime engine.
Mulesoft API Manager is an extremely versatile solution. It offers users the ability to deploy their APIs in a number of different settings. You can use API Manager on a public cloud, a private cloud, or a hybrid. Additionally, users can use the solution to manage their deployments with ease. A few clicks are all you need to alter your deployment.
Benefits of Mulesoft API Manager
Some of the benefits of using Mulesoft API Manager include:
Reviews from Real Users
Mulesoft API Manager is a highly effective piece of software whose purpose is to enable users to design, build, manage, and publish APIs. It stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the ease with which users can connect it to their applications and the high level of value that its support offers. It provides users with the ability to easily connect this solution with whatever program they need to join it with. Users can create connections without having to write code. It offers different types of support which ensure that users have a high level of understanding about the product and how to use it.
PeerSpot user Tolulope A., a technical lead specializing in integration and middleware at a financial services firm, notes the ease with which users can connect Mulesoft API Manager to their applications. He writes, “One good thing about MuleSoft is that they have a lot of connectors to those back-end applications. We don't really need to write code to be able to connect to a database or to connect with SAP. You just need credentials and the connectivity details. Most of the development of what we do is just drag and drop. They're able to connect with applications using standard connectors that are provided by ESB, by MuleSoft.”
The CEO & Co-Founder at a computer retailer notes the value of Mulesoft’s supporting documentation. They write, “The documentation is great; it is always up-to-date and well-presented. If any details are missing, then there is a blog available that contains a lot of details. There are also channels on YouTube to help you better understand the solution and what some of the processes look like.”
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.