Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft API Manager vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.9
MuleSoft API Manager improves process reusability and automation, enhancing development speed, reducing costs, and ensuring seamless, cost-effective integration.
Sentiment score
7.7
WSO2 API Manager offers cost-effective, flexible, and robust open-source solutions, enhancing operational efficiency with excellent support and integration.
This iPaaS platform with CloudHub eliminates variable infrastructure-related costs and saves enterprises on connectivity and operations costs, as everything comes bundled from the MuleSoft side.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Since you can scale it and maintain your work, it is effective.
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
MuleSoft API Manager's customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, though some users seek better priority clarity and business focus.
Sentiment score
6.6
WSO2 API Manager's support praised for enterprise users, but open-source users report mixed experiences with accessibility and response times.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
Lead Software Engineer at Franklin Templeton
If bug fixing is required for downtimes or issues, we receive prompt support with alternative solutions or workarounds.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
I believe the support is a significant strength for WSO2.
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
The support is good, with well-defined documentation and helpful blogs.
Senior Principal Architect at 6d Technologies
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
MuleSoft API Manager is praised for scalability, effectively handling growth despite some costly scaling challenges and configuration variability.
Sentiment score
7.5
WSO2 API Manager's scalability varies, influenced by deployment strategy and version, with benefits in Docker and Kubernetes environments.
Regarding availability, especially with iPaaS solutions, they guarantee 99.99%.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For the cases I have experienced, WSO2 API Manager is easy to scale.
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
MuleSoft API Manager is praised for stability and reliability, with some concerns about connectors and hardware setup.
Sentiment score
7.3
WSO2 API Manager is stable, but can have memory issues; users recommend proper architecture and open-source versions may need updates.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
I do not face any issues regarding API security from OAuth 2 based authentication. It is secured and well-secured, and I have not faced any security-related issues.
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
The system is stable for our low-concurrency use cases.
Senior Principal Architect at 6d Technologies
 

Room For Improvement

MuleSoft API Manager needs improved load balancing, integration, affordability, setup, customization, documentation, analytics, and Salesforce integration details.
WSO2 API Manager needs interface modernization, clearer documentation, better integration, security improvements, enhanced support, and improved pricing strategy.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Lead Software Engineer at Franklin Templeton
Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions.
Senior Principal Architect at 6d Technologies
WSO2 released other products that solved everything related to my concern.
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
 

Setup Cost

MuleSoft API Manager is pricey, but valued for features; costs can prompt exploration of cheaper integration tools.
WSO2 API Manager is free open-source, but enterprise support requires a costly subscription based on feature needs and deployment size.
The major challenge they face is the high pricing, which has become notable especially since they transitioned from a VCore to a usage-based subscription.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it.
Founder at EAIESB
MuleSoft is typically more expensive compared to using Java or Spring Boot APIs hosted in containers.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

MuleSoft API Manager offers scalable API management, seamless integration, security features, and low-code tools for efficient development and insights.
WSO2 API Manager excels in flexibility, scalability, integration, with user-friendly UI and security, enhancing microservices and API management.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
Lead Software Engineer at Franklin Templeton
We can achieve complex requirements using MuleSoft's capabilities without excessive development time.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
In MuleSoft API Manager, I find features like throttling and security to be the most valuable, as these are the things we use and configure as part of our deployments.
Founder at EAIESB
The product's capabilities for integrating with REST APIs are valuable.
Senior Principal Architect at 6d Technologies
The Lifecycle Management feature helps me manage my APIs when I'm using it.
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft API Manager
Ranking in API Management
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WSO2 API Manager
Ranking in API Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of MuleSoft API Manager is 4.5%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
MuleSoft API Manager4.5%
WSO2 API Manager4.3%
Other91.2%
API Management
 

Q&A Highlights

it_user1257666 - PeerSpot reviewer
PRINCIPAL AZURE ARCHITECT - Oil & Energy at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Mar 30, 2020
 

Featured Reviews

D.Rajesh Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Improved Integration Efficiency and Potential for Further Enhancements in Monitoring and User Experience
The policies in MuleSoft API Manager are significant features. We get the policies by default, with more than 25 out-of-the-box policies. If any additional requirement exists specific to the customer, there is a custom policy framework. We can build the policy according to our requirement, and deploy and enable it at the API Manager level to consume across different business groups, environments, or organizations altogether within the platform. Developing the custom policy is not challenging; you just need to follow the custom policy framework to implement. The custom policy and the different levels of SLAs of the API Manager are notable. Regarding the monitoring side of the API Manager, MuleSoft provides substantial monitoring with logs, offering search capability, raw data accessibility, and different subscriptions. With the top tier, integration with third-party platforms such as ELK or Splunk becomes unnecessary because all search capabilities, dashboards, and functional monitoring can be built within the platform itself. This is excellent from the monitoring perspective, and there have been recent improvements focusing on observability. For DevOps, if you want to make your continuous integration and continuous deployment effective, irrespective of the tool, there are options to integrate. For example, you can use the Maven plugin, platform APIs, or CLI to build your end-to-end DevOps cycle.
MM
Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta
Middleware integration has become smoother and manages API lifecycles and scopes effectively
Regarding WSO2 API Manager, I have no drawbacks or areas for improvement. However, regarding the Micro Integrator, I had some issues while developing complex services because it was mainly designed to be used for simple services, not complex ones. While using complex services, I encountered some issues. I communicated this with WSO2, and they released other products that solved everything related to my concern. These products were released before my concern was raised. When I explored them, they were pretty good, and I did not see the same issues I had experienced. WSO2 is enhancing themselves, and their products are fine. The previous concern was about the previous product, so it is resolved now since there are new products available. I would like WSO2 to improve quality or response time in support, or both.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

it_user1257666 - PeerSpot reviewer
PRINCIPAL AZURE ARCHITECT - Oil & Energy at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Mar 30, 2020
Mar 30, 2020
I think the main difference is that WSO2 is open source and you can free download to use it in your on premises platform. But if you are willing to pay for a fully developed product, Mulesoft will provide better support in your full development of API cycle. You may consider their local support for further evaluation. I think the level of support offered by the product vendor is a key considera...
See 2 answers
SK
Vice President - Competency and Channels at Techwave.
Jan 2, 2020
We have evaluated WS02, APIGEE, MuleSoft in the past and based on our selection criteria all three scored pretty close with APIGEE with overall high score with a very small difference. However, based on the key driver each one has an advantage such as WS02 on licensing, APIGEE on performance throughput and MuleSoft on robust integration platform. For more information please reach out to me at ksrinivas@techwave.net
reviewer1314810 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Mar 30, 2020
I think the main difference is that WSO2 is open source and you can free download to use it in your on premises platform. But if you are willing to pay for a fully developed product, Mulesoft will provide better support in your full development of API cycle. You may consider their local support for further evaluation. I think the level of support offered by the product vendor is a key consideration for your choice.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise43
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...
How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?
I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...
What do you like most about Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies.
What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?
It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.
What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?
We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...
What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?
We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...
 

Also Known As

Anypoint API Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Splunk, Citrix, UCSF, Vertu, State of Colorado, National Post, TiVo, Deakin, LLS, Oldcastle Precast, ParcelPoint, Justice Systems, Ube, Sumitomo Corporation, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Groupe Initiatives, Camelot, Panviva
1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft API Manager vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.