No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.2 out of 5

82 reviews
94% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) enables cross-technology testing without extra tools, boasting excellent scalability for large workloads. It supports diverse protocols and enhances testing efficiency with parameterization and correlation functions. Comprehensive reporting aids performance insights. However, high pricing, integration challenges with platforms like SiteScope, technical support issues, and reliance on SiteScope for monitoring are drawbacks. Concerns about resource management with TruClients under high loads exist.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) offers extensive protocol support, enabling testing across various technologies.

The comprehensive results analysis feature helps save time and optimize system performance.

The scalability and ability to handle large workloads make it suitable for high-demand testing environments.

Effective integration with other testing and monitoring solutions enhances overall performance testing capabilities.

Setting up and configuring OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is straightforward, contributing to ease of use.

CONS

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) integration with other tools like SiteScope presents challenges despite being within the same product family.

Licensing and pricing are concerns, with many users finding it expensive compared to other available resources.

Technical support is rated poorly, with slow response times and a need for improvement in assistance quality.

High resource utilization is observed, with the tool being heavy and sometimes causing performance issues during testing.

There are challenges with features like TruClient protocol and its complexity in use, impacting user satisfaction.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Pros review quotes

SD

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

May 26, 2025

I would definitely recommend OpenText LoadRunner Professional to other users.

Read full review

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

Apr 21, 2025

LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful.

Read full review

Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak

Oct 20, 2023

We don't find any features lacking. One of the most beneficial points we have from LoadRunner is we start sizing our infrastructure accordingly. So what we do is when we deploy a new workload, we do performance testing.

Read full review

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Free Report: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems

Apr 18, 2024

When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Jan 8, 2024

I appreciate its ability to handle various internal calls and its user-friendly interface.

Read full review

reviewer1246755

Performance Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 25, 2023

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Oct 27, 2023

The most valuable feature depends on what we're doing at the time. In the past, the greatest feature was the ability to record and play back to produce a script. Another great feature is that we can monitor the system. They also support many protocols to perform load testing.

Read full review

AN

Arssy Hasyir Nursidiq

Script analyst at Alpha Citra Siber Indonesia

Jan 12, 2024

My favorite feature in LoadRunner Professional is its ability to group scripts under separate IDs.

Read full review

DS

Dibyajipan Sethi

Performance Task Consultant at PCS Systemtechnik GmbH

Oct 26, 2023

The front loader and the reporting features are the most valuable aspects of OpenText LoadRunner Professional.

Read full review

QA Performance Engineer at African Bank

Sep 1, 2023

Its variety of testing tools for different applications is of great benefit, as well as its integration capabilities with other testing and monitoring solutions.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 75)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Cons review quotes

SD

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

May 26, 2025

I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps.

Read full review

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

Apr 21, 2025

IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.

Read full review

Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak

Oct 20, 2023

The only scenario we see a complexity is when we have single-page applications where JavaScript is talking to the server and coming back. That's the only scenario where we find some difficulties.

Read full review

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Free Report: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems

Apr 18, 2024

LoadRunner experiences high resource utilization. Even though we have machines with higher configurations, I've observed this behavior. Heavy traffic recording results in the tool hanging. So heavy traffic recording makes the tool slow.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Jan 8, 2024

I also use the TrueClient feature for browser-based testing. I found the TrueClient feature to be a bit difficult to use and not very user-friendly for automating scripts.

Read full review

reviewer1246755

Performance Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 25, 2023

On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high-quality technical support, I rate the support a one.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Oct 27, 2023

The monitoring technology in LoadRunner could be improved. It depends on another tool called SiteScope, but they only took a part of the features of SiteScope. They need to improve on that.

Read full review

AN

Arssy Hasyir Nursidiq

Script analyst at Alpha Citra Siber Indonesia

Jan 12, 2024

In terms of improvement, it lacks mobile testing features present in some competitors, like GitMatters, which I find valuable.

Read full review

DS

Dibyajipan Sethi

Performance Task Consultant at PCS Systemtechnik GmbH

Oct 26, 2023

The reporting and GUI have room for improvement.

Read full review

QA Performance Engineer at African Bank

Sep 1, 2023

Compared to some other vendors, there is a lack of community support.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 75)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Perfecto vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Perfecto vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

See all alternatives

Related questions

22

Performance/Load Testing Tools: What are the options?

34

OATS (Oracle Application Testing Suite) vs. HP Loadrunner?

28

What is your greatest success or failure using a testing tool? Please share with the community

21

HP LoadRunner versus Oracle Application Testing Suite?

49

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

65

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

45

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

65

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

49

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

52

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?