Sr. No. HP Load Runner
1 Supports many types of Protocols which covers almost all kinds of application.
2 Loadrunner supports multiple protocols for a single script.
3 Built in support and manual correlation* is easily available.
For ex: Loadrunner has better support for correlation as it has special protocols for every kind of technologies/application.
4 Loadrunner supports 'C' and Java for scripting.
5 Supports automation for windows/desktop based application.
6 Loadrunner does not require object identification.
Oracle Load Testing
1 Supports lesser protocols - HTTP and few Web-based Protocols.
2 It may support multiple protocol for a single script but we need to do one pilot project to be sure.
3 Built in support for correlation* is mainly Provided by Oracle Technologies.
For ex: Oracle Application Testing Suite may have better support for correlation while on Oracle technologies.
4 Oracle’s OpenScript (Scripting development environment) supports coding only using Java. So Java programming Knowledge is mandatory for scripting.
5 Does not support automation for windows/desktop based Applications.
6 Facing difficulties in identifying some objects in Internet Explorer.
refer my blog spot at --> performancetestinginfotoolwise . blogspot . com
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and Oracle Application Testing Suite are major contenders in performance and load testing solutions. LoadRunner Professional offers an edge with its wide protocol support and advanced reporting capabilities, making it suitable for diverse environments. In contrast, Oracle Application Testing Suite is better when integrated with Oracle's ecosystem. Features: LoadRunner Professional supports numerous protocols and...
Sr. No. HP Load Runner
1 Supports many types of Protocols which covers almost all kinds of application.
2 Loadrunner supports multiple protocols for a single script.
3 Built in support and manual correlation* is easily available.
For ex: Loadrunner has better support for correlation as it has special protocols for every kind of technologies/application.
4 Loadrunner supports 'C' and Java for scripting.
5 Supports automation for windows/desktop based application.
6 Loadrunner does not require object identification.
Oracle Load Testing
1 Supports lesser protocols - HTTP and few Web-based Protocols.
2 It may support multiple protocol for a single script but we need to do one pilot project to be sure.
3 Built in support for correlation* is mainly Provided by Oracle Technologies.
For ex: Oracle Application Testing Suite may have better support for correlation while on Oracle technologies.
4 Oracle’s OpenScript (Scripting development environment) supports coding only using Java. So Java programming Knowledge is mandatory for scripting.
5 Does not support automation for windows/desktop based Applications.
6 Facing difficulties in identifying some objects in Internet Explorer.
refer my blog spot at --> performancetestinginfotoolwise . blogspot . com