Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Oracle and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #22, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Oracle holds a 1.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,793 Views
1,004 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,376 Views
10,474 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

In the field of software testing tools, Tricentis Tosca and Oracle Application Testing Suite are prominent competitors. Tricentis Tosca is favored for its advanced features and integration capabilities, giving it an edge in robust automation offerings.

Features:Tricentis Tosca provides model-based test automation, scriptless automation, and broad technological support, including SAP and Salesforce. It is designed for testers of all skill levels to create automated tests quickly. Oracle Application Testing Suite excels in integration with Oracle products, robust performance testing, and a wide testing range across Oracle environments but offers less support for non-Oracle technologies.

Room for Improvement:Tricentis Tosca could improve mobile testing support and lower licensing costs, aiming to attract small businesses. Enhancements in reporting and integrating with other testing tools would be beneficial. Oracle Application Testing Suite requires improvements in user documentation, cross-browser testing performance, and support capabilities to meet user expectations and market standards better.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Tricentis Tosca allows flexible deployment across on-premises and cloud environments but receives mixed reviews over customer service quality and response time. Oracle Application Testing Suite primarily relies on on-premises deployment and is commended for efficient, responsive customer service, although its hybrid cloud capabilities are limited.

Pricing and ROI:Tricentis Tosca is perceived as costly; however, its comprehensive features and automation efficiency deliver significant ROI for large enterprises with long-term projects. Its pricing strategy may hinder small company adoption. Oracle Application Testing Suite offers competitive pricing, making it attractive for Oracle-integrated businesses with cost-effective solutions at lower initial investments, though advanced features may incur additional costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (13th), Load Testing Tools (12th)

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 12.0%, down from 20.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	12.0%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.7%
Other	86.3%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can organize test scripts pretty well."

"It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"For a few years, OATS was the only tool that allowed us to load test our Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) with Siebel."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"This tool did a much better job recording the http requests during web load testing than other open source tools."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."

"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."

"The low code is the best feature."

"Object Identification Wizard."

"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is it is a completely scriptless automation tool, which I liked a lot. They keep on continuously improving their tools, wherever we are facing any challenges they are able to provide a solution for it. It is easy to learn, everyone can easily read and understand what is happening with the scripts. Any business user or function tester can use the tool efficiently. This is a complete solution package."

"Overall, everything is reusable simply via drag and drop, and you will always have a single point of maintenance (e.g. in a future release of your SUT a button was added, you just need adapt the module. Linked test cases and execution lists are updated automatically)."

"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."

"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"It does not provide easy diagnostics to ascertain end to end transaction monitoring."

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"We have stability issues with the server logging off when a script runs from OTM."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."

"The record and play is still a new feature and while SAP has been added to the latest version, it is still lacking usefulness for common repository setups."

"It may be different for other companies, but for us, establishing a set of procedures to get people trained was important."

"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."

"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."

"When using it with iOS devices, I cannot start automation directly and must use a remote machine."

"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."

"Parallel execution is not yet implemented for Tosca. This means you can't execute the same test case on multiple machines remotely."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."

"There is an annual cost for Tricentis."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

February 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

OATS

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.