In the realm of functional testing, OpenText UFT and IBM DevOps Test UI both offer compelling features, with OpenText UFT having the upper hand due to its broad integration capabilities and robust support for complex application environments.
Features: OpenText UFT provides extensive browser and environment support, seamless integration with numerous third-party tools, and versatile testing environments. Its strong object identification capabilities and support for diverse platforms make it ideal for complex setups. IBM DevOps Test UI is notable for its integration capabilities within software development lifecycle tools, support for Java and .NET scripting languages, and efficient automation abilities that cater to specific framework integrations.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT users suggest improvements in performance constraints like lengthy load times, browser compatibility, and framework optimization. There's also a need for better DevOps pipeline integration and scripting flexibility beyond VBScript. IBM DevOps Test UI could enhance object identification and user experience, aligning more closely with modern automation practices and ease of use for non-technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is versatile with both on-premises and cloud deployment options but is criticized for being resource-intensive. Customer service feedback is mixed, with reports of prompt assistance and delays in complex issues. IBM DevOps Test UI boasts a simpler deployment process, though customer support experiences similarly vary, with occasional slow responses reported. Dependable support teams are crucial for both products.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is known for its high licensing cost but offers substantial ROI through reduced manual testing and increased coverage, making it suitable for enterprises with complex needs. IBM DevOps Test UI provides competitive pricing within the Rational Suite, and both tools benefit from clearer pricing structures to lower the entry barrier. Over time, investments in both solutions can lead to increased automation efficiency and reduced time to market.
IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
