We implement it for customers. We have some customers in Mexico who need that kind of technology. We sell that technology to them. Some of our customers have experience working with previous versions of Barracuda; they ask us to implement that kind of device. We have certification with Barracuda, we have certification with some other brands.
CIO LATAM at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
You can program it to detect certain attacks, and it will automatically insulate or block the IP
Pros and Cons
- "If an employee tries to get or move a file that is not permitted to them - for example if he wants to copy it to a USB - he will not have the right to do that, because Barracuda manages who has the right to copy, and what you copy to a USB. The USB is encrypted with a specific code from Barracuda and will only be decrypted into any other laptop in the company if they allow it to see it."
- "When you are sending information to an external email address, Barracuda can warn you when you are trying to access a private or personal email, or trying to upload information and not allow you to do that."
- "Easy integration with some other systems like LDAP or Active Directory to manage other permissions and the division of external access and internal access."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Barracuda has a very simple interface, very good security, all the features of the best firewalls in the market, but with a very friendly interface.
Something that we've seen that Barracuda, and some other brands also, have. When you program the firewall to detect certain kinds of attacks, Barracuda can detect that kind of attack and automatically insulate, or remove, or encapsulate the very specific IP, if it's internal. And if it's external it just blocks any kind of communication with that specific IP. If you want, Barracuda will warn the security team. If you allow, or release, that IP, it will continue communication. If not, it will block it forever, or until you release it.
Internally, we'll remove it until you release also, but we allow the IT team to review what is happening with that particular piece of equipment, a computer, a laptop, a server, any kind of device into which a "back door" can be opened or through which they're trying to get some information. Barracuda can help with that. That is one of the most important features we've seen with Barracuda.
I cannot mention the name, due to the NDA that we have signed with a financial company, a financial entity. But we implemented Barracuda with them. Right now they are monitoring all the information that their employees are managing. If an employee tries to get or move a file that is not permitted to them - for example if he wants to copy it to a USB - he will not have the right to do that, because Barracuda manages who has the right to copy, and what you copy to a USB. The USB is encrypted with a specific code from Barracuda and will only be decrypted into any other laptop in the company if they allow it to see it.
Even in the network, a feature of Windows is to see how you are sharing files. Barracuda can help you to monitor how you are moving files.
When you are sending information to an external email address, Barracuda can warn you when you are trying to access a private or personal email, or trying to upload information; it's not allowing you to do that. That was the biggest feature that that financial entity admired in Barracuda, among others.
Easy integration with some other systems like LDAP or Active Directory to manage other permissions and the division of external access and internal access.
What needs improvement?
The problem we found was with the issue of configuration. Our engineers are working with some other brands, they have knowledge of other brands. With Barracuda it's a matter of translating the comments. So maybe one company calls something a "black box" and with Barracuda they call "black" "dark." So it's a matter of getting to know it.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
February 2026
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda CloudGen Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We had only one issue. But after we did the analysis and we escalated the issue with the Barracuda service desk, the issue was shown to be coming from a failure in a RAM memory card in the Barracuda. That issue was detected by technical support. They sent a replacement, it solved the issue, and we continued working.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues with scalability.
How are customer service and support?
When we buy the device for the customer, we buy the Enhanced Support, the extended support contract, 24/7 support. When we write in with issues we get very quick answers from technical support. The communication with their engineers is very fluid.
We had a couple of sessions at one point; the engineer working with us never put down the phone. When her work hours were supposed to end, we changed to another engineer, but not immediately. The first one didn't say goodbye immediately. She stayed behind for 30 minutes to explain and transfer the case to the other engineer and we completed the test with the other engineer. He detected the failure and created the RMA to change the problematic piece and that was it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are not entirely switching to Barracuda. We want to, but we are not because before we started selling Barracuda we had invested in other brands and, obviously, in the accounting and in reality, we need to complete using them. But yes, we are thinking of moving to Barracuda after we have had it for three years. We want to show our customers that we are using the technology we are selling.
The firewall we are using in our company is Palo Alto, it's a very good firewall, a very robust firewall as well. But when we are doing the comparison with Barracuda we can see it's not the same. The biggest difference between the brands is pricing.
How was the initial setup?
This is something that I have never specifically asked my technical team. The simple answer is that they have told me there is no problem. It's very easy. We only need to know the names of the commented bits, because there are some comments where the names are changing.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We compared Barracuda with Cisco. We compared Barracuda, at that time, with Fortinet. When we did the comparison we felt Cisco was another great product. But the difference in this case, what made Barracuda the winner, was the price, at that time.
What other advice do I have?
We are an information technology service provider in telecommunications. We can supply any kind of device, for a datacenter, and contact centers, for our customers. We are using technology from Dell, HPE, Palo Alto, Barracuda, and some other brands to implement technology solutions for customers.
Our principal service is a managed service, information security services, or cyber security. We sell those services to different customers in Mexico. We are serving Central America and some other countries in Latin America.
I give Barracuda an eight out of 10 because they can still give more to the end-user. They still have things they can improve. They have very good features but I think they can improve some of those features and make it into a super service. Today, they are a good solution. It could be a super solution.
Regarding Barracuda, Google has been using that technology for a very long time. If a company like Google is using that technology...
Take the opportunity to get to know the device. You need to request a proof of concept, in the case that you are comparing it with another brand. That is the best way to show what Barracuda can do, completely. It's not the same as a simple server, or any other device.
If you only want to secure internet access, Barracuda will comply completely with all the features you require. But if you have public servers, and you are looking for more security options, etc., and don't want to spend a lot, Barracuda is what you are looking for. If you are a company that has no specific standard to follow, Barracuda is what you are looking for. It has very good hardware, it has very good software - or operating system - and they have very good features and good pricing. If you compare it with other brands, Barracuda is a very good solution.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner.
System & Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
We use it as a border firewall. We use it to control all in/out Internet traffic.
Pros and Cons
- "We use Barracuda NG Firewall as a border firewall. We trough it to control all in/out Internet traffic."
- "Sometimes we have a need for detailed reports. Barracuda NG Firewall does not have a reports module and uses a satellite application."
What is our primary use case?
My current company operates in the financial arena so we have to maintain our infrastructure according to leading security standards (PCI DSS and PA-DSS). These devices allow us to pass external and internal penetration tests by supporting all the recommendations of those standards.
What is most valuable?
At the moment, the most valuable features are Application Control (Layer 7 filtering) and IPS/IDS. For existing network architecture, we use Barracuda NG Firewall as a border firewall. We use it to control all in/out Internet traffic.
What needs improvement?
Sometimes we have a need for detailed reports. Barracuda NG Firewall does not have a reports module and uses a satellite application (Barracuda NG Firewall Report Creator). In some cases, this report is uncomfortable to use.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yes, we have had stability issues, but we use Barracuda NG firewall in HA mode. Therefore, we did not have problems with availability of services. HA mode operates very well.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have had no issues due to scalability.
How are customer service and technical support?
On a scale from one to 10, my rating is an eight. Level 1 and 2 of their support are good, but if you want serious expertise (Level 3), there are some issues. This is related to my area, maybe it is different in some other areas.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have personally used a lot of different solutions in my career (Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point, etc.).
I switched to this solution for the first time due to group standards. After trying this solution, I liked it and it became one of my favorites.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is very intuitive for people with network technology knowledge.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is a product with a very transparent model of licensing. In the sense of hidden expenses, they do not exist with this model.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated a lot of different options. We concluded that Barracuda NG Firewall provided the most features for an exemplary price.
What other advice do I have?
My advice is to try and evaluate it (Barracuda offers a trial period of one month). I think that a lot of people will be pleasantly surprised with its possibilities.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
February 2026
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda CloudGen Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Infrastucture - Cloud Admin at a tech company with 51-200 employees
The product is great, and it fulfilled our expectations. However, we found it a little harder to configure than others.
What is most valuable?
In the time we were using it:
- Intrusion Prevention System/Intrusion Detection System (IPS/IDS)
- Layer 7 filtering
- DDoS prevention
- HA
- Traffic management, among others.
How has it helped my organization?
During the testing time, the improvement was prominent as we stop unwanted outgoing traffic and were able to get real-time logs. This provided us with better bandwidth administration and usage.
What needs improvement?
If I compare it to other firewalls like Kerio Control, I would say that, probably, the GUI/Configuration Menu is something that could be more user friendly.
For how long have I used the solution?
We used it for almost two months while we were researching firewall solutions and this was one option.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Not much, the problem was on our side because it was the first time with this kind of firewall (and brand), but the installation of the virtual appliance was really easy.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
None, from the first day to the last, the firewall ran with no issues at all.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
None at all as long as you have the money to pay for the licenses to scale the system.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Nil, here in Argentina, the distributor was limited to providing the price of the product. We had to resolve issues by doing our own research.
Technical Support:We didn´t use the technical support, however we watched, many times, the webinars that Barracuda gave.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
At that time we were using pfSense, which is not bad at all, but we needed something more enterprise-class like, and Barracuda Networks gave that to us. The monitoring tools are great.
How was the initial setup?
Compared with other Firewalls, yes, it was complex but that´s for two reasons,
- The firewall has plenty of options to configure
- Because we were not trained or used to this kind of firewall, the initial set-up was long
What about the implementation team?
We installed this application on our own, and we didn't receive any advice on it. I can say that the Latin America team at Barracuda took some time to reply to our questions through email.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We were evaluating a lot of appliances/firewalls/UTM like,
- Sonicwall
- Checkpoint
- Bluecoat
- Kerio Control
- Cisco ASA
- Sophos Gateway (formerly Astaro Gateway)
There were also many others that I don´t remember now as well. We were looking for simplicity and effectiveness.
What other advice do I have?
Try it before you buy. Barracuda gives the chance to try the hardware and the software before buying it so you can test all the things that you will need and use day-to-day. And if you can, take a seminar to get the most out of the devices. However we found the product a little harder to configure than others, and so it´s not a product for unskilled/inexperienced administrators. You will need training to get the best of this product.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It provides an antivirus and filters for URL and web, but setup can be complex.
What is most valuable?
- Firewall
- VPN protocol - TINA
- Antivirus
- URL filter
- Web filter
What needs improvement?
It is already a complete product.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've used this product since 2012.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No issues encountered.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Support is really great as we are a a diamond partner.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used Cisco ASA before, but the Barracuda NG Firewall is better.
How was the initial setup?
It can be complex, but also straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We are a managed service provider. So we setup a lot of boxes, and the implementation depends how complex the clients' network is.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Diamond partners
Sr ICT Consultant with 501-1,000 employees
Updating firewalls, both for firmware and on fixes, requires a couple of mouse clicks. However, initial deployment required a steep learning curve.
How has it helped my organization?
Since updating single boxes or large amounts of systems only requires a couple of mouse clicks, it allows us to keep the firewalls up to date, both for firmware and on fixes, in demanding locations around the globe. This process is such that we trust it to handle nearly impossible to reach systems too.
What is most valuable?
The real difference is the fact that it truly scales, and fully managing a thousand firewalls worldwide with a team of two is quite doable. Even with serious hardware failures, you can often still securely manage the system and analyze the issue at hand, or even fix certain issues. Other indispensable functions, are the full transparency of handled data, both real time and historical, the ability to create VPN tunnels in the blink of an eye, the multiple parallel VPN tunnels, and near infinite routing options.
What needs improvement?
Although IPv6 was implemented a couple of years ago in the Barracuda NG Firewalls, the real use of IPv6 is still rare. This means that the “real world exposure” of these parts is less than the IPv4 parts. This is obviously a general issue for security vendors.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
None what so ever, we use these systems in critical 24x7x365 environments because of their stability and resiliency.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Barracuda offers a wide range of models ranging up to 40 GB sustained firewall throughput, and since all their systems work from a single image, I’ve never had an issue with scaling or migrating them.
The Barracuda NG Firewall, managed through the Barracuda Control Center thrives in large to very large environments. Unlike other vendors, the management really scales. Managing (all aspects) a thousand firewalls anywhere in the world with just a couple of engineers, is quit doable. The current practical maximum of firewalls to manage simultaneously is around 7,500, but that is quite beyond my scope.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
I’ve been in IT for nearly 40 years, and I’ve had my share of dealings with “service/support organizations”, often service/support was just the name of the department, but down the line it got a different meaning. Barracuda’s definition of support however extends every definition of the term to a new level.
These guys are accessible, no phone trees etc., they are polite, extremely knowledgeable, and customer oriented. Officially you need a subscription to be eligible for support, but I’ve never seen them turn their back on anyone. Barracuda Service is really Barracuda Service.
Technical Support:
There is not really a difference between customer service and technical support except maybe in the questions asked (and the people assigned to answer these questions).
Every user is entitled to full technical support which, as states, is unsurpassed in the IT industry.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I’ve been working with firewalls in small, medium and world scale solutions, since approx. 1994. and have dealt with a substantial amount of systems from number of vendors (like Check Point, Juniper NetScreen, Cisco PIX and ASA and some smaller ones).
Over the years, I’ve seen many sales guys promising “the world” but upon closer scrutiny actually offering very little. I must confess that I told the Barracuda (Phion back than) sales guy of my experiences, and his reply was; “you’re right, I’ll organize a phone conference with one of the developers”. My immediate reply was “Do these guys talk to mortals?”
After a very frank and open call lasting far beyond the one hour initially set, I was convinced that this product truly did stand out. Seven years of experience later, I’m even more convinced that this solution is unparalleled.
How was the initial setup?
Let me rephrase, my “first setup” was complex, as the Barracuda NG firewall is different to others, but once you understand what you’ve got, and can get your head around it, it’s tremendously straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
I’ve received full training of the Barracuda NG Firewall, and I’m the guy that designs the entire environment, and gets to setup the complex parts, and for the really insane tweaks, I can always count on the help of the entire Barracuda team. They are always reachable and will come over on short notice for special cases. These are the people who were part of team that build the systems back in the very early 2000’s and working with these guys is always a pleasure.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is a real next generation firewall, if you’re looking for any run of the mill box and have little requirements, it’s probably not for you. If your requirements are more demanding and especially if you’ve got a number of locations, this is the product to consider.
The price itself is in the normal range, so the real benefit lies in the savings in management and amount of staff. Furthermore, Barracuda offers a so called instant replacement contract that not only entitles you to replacement of defective hardware, but also after four years enables you to replace the system with a brand new system for free.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
As stated, I’ve worked with firewalls from different vendors, also in quite large environments, but they are no match for the Barracuda NG Firewall, not by a long shot. The vendors were:
- Check Point
- Cisco PIX and ASA
- Juniper NetScreen
- CyberGuard
- SonicWALL
- IIS
What other advice do I have?
Although it is a truly great firewall it is certainly not a “run of the mill” product, and even if you have thorough knowledge of other firewall environment, don’t go in there without a good partner that will guide and support you.

Not really a Barracuda NG Firewall but a Barracuda rack mounted device (EON) that is capable of running the NG Firewall, next to instances of e.g. Web Application Firewall, Web Filters, etc., the sustained throughput on these boxes is around 250 GB.
Showing an F10, low-end, firewall and an F600, mid-range, model Barracuda NG Firewall
Just the first screen of a (demo env.) Barracuda Control Center showing the status of some firewalls
The Barracuda tool (NGEarth) that allows you to monitor in real time your VPN tunnels and system status (again demo)
Example showing traffic history (just one of the many screens.)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Diamond partner since 2008
IT Consultant - Network Admin at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
We had some problems getting the TINA tunnels working. Now that they are working they're valuable.
What is most valuable?
- TINA tunnels
- Real time firewall logs
- GFI editor
How has it helped my organization?
It upgraded the previous Linux Clark Connect infrastructure and established proper site to site VPN tunnels for all offices across Canada and the US.
What needs improvement?
The GUI can be confusing and overwhelming at times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Initially we had some problems getting the TINA tunnels working, but after a while things went well. The support techs for the product were great.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
9/10.
Technical Support:9/10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used Clark Connects and we switched because the product was at its end of life and was no longer supported by the Linux community.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up the BGRP routing protocol was a bit confusing but otherwise not so much. The ability to create the shell of the gateways before deployment on the NG management made things fairly straight forward.
What about the implementation team?
We did it in-house.
What was our ROI?
It has offered improved network monitoring and intrusion prevention which we otherwise had none of. The office was under constant spamming by Chinese and Russian IP sub-nets and at one time the exchange server was covertly hijacked as an SMTP relay. The NG gateways helped mitigate these issues.
What other advice do I have?
If you have an issue call support. If you're a Cisco net tech prepare for different terminology and network design.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The VPN tunnel provides a secure environment in the organization but sometimes you are unable to login using the default login.
What is most valuable?
The VPN feature.
How has it helped my organization?
The drag and drop features of VPN are really convenient to be configured. Additionally, the VPN tunnel provides a secure environment in the organization.
What needs improvement?
Nothing much except some little buggy issue sometimes, such as unable to login using the default login when out-of-box and will required factory reset once again.
For how long have I used the solution?
About one year.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Nothing much except some buggy issues sometimes as mentioned above.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Nothing much except some buggy issues sometimes as mentioned above.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
5/10.
Technical Support:7/10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We switched as this is cheaper than our previous solution.
How was the initial setup?
It is pretty straightforward for a basic configuration.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We also looked at Cisco ASA.
What other advice do I have?
Request the assistance of experts when going for a deployment.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Leiterin Netzwerk Security at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
A tool that allows its users to manage big environments with fewer resources
Pros and Cons
- "One of the big benefits of the product is that it allows you to manage big environments with fewer resources."
- "Barracuda CloudGen Firewall should work a little bit more with the logs so that, in our company, we can generate a little bit more reports and get a bit more statistics, which would be fine for us."
What is most valuable?
One of the big benefits of the product is that it allows you to manage big environments with fewer resources. The product offers very good management.
What needs improvement?
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall should work a little bit more with the logs so that, in our company, we can generate a little bit more reports and get a bit more statistics, which would be fine for us. The firewall's functionalities are okay, including network and security. The tool should improve its reporting and security areas, which are the only areas of concern related to the product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Barracuda CloudGen Firewall for twenty-two years. I use the solution's different model versions, including Barracuda CloudGen Firewall F12.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
How was the initial setup?
The product is easy to deploy, configure, and update.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I would prefer users to opt for Palo Alto in enterprise-sized environments, like energy companies, health companies, or financial organizations. Compared to Barracuda CloudGen Firewalls, Palo Alto offers its users a little bit more security. Palo Alto's threat prevention, sandboxing functionalities, and web filtering features are good. I don't know the other vendors so well that I could talk about them.
What other advice do I have?
Though there are some issues with Barracuda CloudGen Firewall, those working with it in our company are mostly satisfied with it.
I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2026
Product Categories
Firewalls Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) IoT Security WAN EdgePopular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
Netgate pfSense
Sophos Firewall
Cisco Secure Firewall
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
WatchGuard Firebox
Cisco Meraki MX
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW)
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
Azure Firewall
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Forescout Platform
SonicWall TZ
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
- Fortigate vs Barracuda
- What do you recommend for a corporate firewall implementation?
- Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
- Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
- Which is the best network firewall for a small retailer?
- When evaluating Firewalls, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cyberoam or Fortinet?
- Fortinet, Palo Alto or Check Point?
- If you could go back, would you change your decision to buy that firewall and why?













