As an organization, we have implemented Azure Microsoft and AWS for some applications. Most of the workloads are managed in the cloud. Therefore we needed a tool that could protect us against some type of cyber threat that would generate losses in the apps that are being used. We apply CloudGuard Workload that comes to us to cover all those security breaches that we could see presenting. In the beginning, we used the free trial to do some tests, and it worked for what we needed it for, and then we acquired it with all the functionalities
Consultant at ITQS
Agentless, fast, and precise
Pros and Cons
- "It has great scalability."
- "They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
CloudGuard Workload Protection came to help us a lot in the organization in the application development part since it is one of the areas where there is more workflow and vital generation of the company since applications are generated and modified daily. With this tool, IT came to us to help provide a series of security layers to all these flows by providing us with different types of security options such as alerts and improvements. One of the characteristics that we liked very much is that it can be coupled with different public clouds.
What is most valuable?
One of the CloudGuard Workload Protection features that we liked a lot is the security it handles in containers.
Another interesting thing is that it works without an agent involved.
It also offers great complete visibility of all devices, and assets in the cloud, which allows us to control all those assets, thus generating complete analysis of the infrastructure in real-time. In this way, we've been able to attack the points where there is some vulnerability in our infrastructure and being able to be at the forefront of security.
What needs improvement?
It cost us a little to find some information about CloudGuard Workload Protection. It cost us to find information about the tool and recommendations.
The configuration administration documentation is not very available on the web, or it is not completely updated. They should also improve the support so that we can create a case and they can respond faster. They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well. It is sometimes difficult to coordinate support hours.
They do not provide a concrete and rapid solution which causes security implementations to be delayed.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
The solution was implemented a¿twoo ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
So far, the stability of the product has remained excellent. We have not presented any failures.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has great scalability. It's very fast and precise.
How are customer service and support?
The support offered by Check Point in general is very regular.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No other solution has been implemented.
How was the initial setup?
Like all setup-type software, it is very easy to install.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was done in conjunction with a support team from the company and the supplier.
What was our ROI?
The implementation of a security tool is always an excellent investment. One thing outweighs the other.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The installation of the product is very reliable, and fast, and it is a very competitive cost in the market.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Check Point was the first solution we used. It was recommended by third parties.
What other advice do I have?
It is a very complete tool for workflows. It provides excellent security.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Consultant at ITQS
Great centralized monitoring, alerts, and helpful integration
Pros and Cons
- "The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company."
- "Check Point tools need to improve the latency in the portal since they take a long time to load."
What is our primary use case?
Currently, the company I work for has implemented several cloud solutions such as Azure and AWS, in which they are migrating from AWS to Azure to have everything unified in a single environment.
At the moment, we have different applications in both clouds, which have their own system of security in the environments. Recently, in the country there were several ransomware attacks on government companies they were the target due to this we decided to expand security a little more and it was where we made use of Check Point tools that will help us comply with a more centralized security that is more robust on all our end devices.
How has it helped my organization?
We have made the decision to centralize our security infrastructure via that CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool. It has contributed a lot to security since many companies were having security problems. We decided we could be one of the few that was not violated with this tool as it gave us a lot of security and helped us avoid vulnerabilities. We were able to counteract attacks with the recommendations that the tool gave us since each point of vulnerability that we found told us how to increase security. That is how our organization was able to survive even an attack.
What is most valuable?
The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company. These are helping us to prevent misfortune. Some of these features are centralized monitoring, alerts that indicate some type of vulnerability, recommendations on how to reduce these vulnerabilities, and configuration and monitoring of policies, all based on real-time monitoring with excellent efficiency. They are very effective.
One of the most effective functionalities is integration with the cloud since a match can also be done between the two.
What needs improvement?
Check Point tools need to improve the latency in the portal since they take a long time to load.
They also need to improve the support a little or hire more staff since the response time is slow or the solutions take a long time to implement.
Check Point should give added value to all those customers who purchase their product by providing training so that they can certify in the tool. That way, the customer stops depending so much on support and can solve incidents themselves.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for approximately Three year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is very good. Even when updates are made, it has not presented any type of failure.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool has excellent scalability.
How are customer service and support?
The support must improve the level of service and must train their staff a bit more.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Currently, we only had other Check Point tools.
How was the initial setup?
Making the investment is a bit high, however, it is very effective to make the acquisition of the tool.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was done with the help of the vendor and an engineer.
What was our ROI?
Here it will be reflected in the long term since it is not something tangible but by making the investment in security we can have a company always working
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost is a bit high, however, the investment is worth it.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Palo Alto and Cisco however, they forced us through Check Point at the company.
What other advice do I have?
The solution is very effective. It fulfills perfectly for what it was made to do.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cloud Analyst at Cloud2Go
Has great support and helped us analyze the security of our Azure environment
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the separate environment."
- "The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We use Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management to increase our visibility into our environment and ensure that our policies are being followed.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution has helped us analyze the security of our Azure environment. Trend Micro and Check Point analyze the Azure environment with our tenants and clients to check for security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. We need to correct these problems and alert our team and clients of any issues. The solution also compares these actions between two applications.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the separate environment. In the testing environment, we can have Client A, Client B, and Client C. We can check this information in one portal. It is possible to separate access to this information for my clients to review.
What needs improvement?
The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management for three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I give the stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I give the scalability a nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is great.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The license fee is high.
What other advice do I have?
I give Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management a ten out of ten.
Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is a good solution and I recommend it.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Soporte técnico superior at Acobo
Identifies issues, offers good analysis, and has automation capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "It has an analytics service that does research for us."
- "The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score."
What is our primary use case?
We were in the review analysis, seeking a fast, efficient infrastructure with solid bases of data analysis and investigation. We wanted something that managed to establish and analyze systems in production so that it would not impact their use. We also wanted a visualization of our current state, with a solution that could give an example of the route that must be taken to achieve excellence in security. This tool has allowed us to achieve stronger security, allows for better analysis, and provides structure and guidance for better guides and international policies under a legal framework.
How has it helped my organization?
It has given us a way to clearly and objectively identify items or issues before making any changes to the network. It offers assurance, after investigation, of a clear understanding of what each analysis is trying to define. We can now clearly and specifically achieve what we need to do from a security standpoint to help us make an action plan and achieve goals. Once we have the information, it is important to define and analyze the data collected, organize information in a format that makes sense to us administrators, and look for patterns or trends that may be useful for our investigation.
What is most valuable?
It has an analytics service that does research for us. This can provide valuable information to ultimately improve our infrastructure. Via research and analysis, we are able to identify problem areas. We can find trends and take action to fix problems while improving performance.
Its fairly advanced automation allows us to simplify and speed up security management in the cloud. This includes being able to identify, correct, and validate all kinds of vulnerabilities that reduce the manual workload for each of our company's administrators, thus being more efficient. With this new efficiency, we are able to reach effective resolutions at all times.
What needs improvement?
The tool has several specific characteristics at the Microsoft 365 or Exchange level.
The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score. They should be improving the visualization of data and greater coverage in Sharepoint or Teams. Its posture analysis is currently low. There could be improvement or capacity to be more efficient if we managed to achieve greater integration with Microsoft Security score, improvements in data visualization,, and greater coverage of Microsoft 365 resources.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Multicloud posture and review, modern, and backed by all checkpoint security.
Pros and Cons
- "The administration portal panel is very intuitive."
- "The guidelines to implement or to link with the clouds are not complete."
What is our primary use case?
It helped us a lot in improving the regulations and security of our cloud environments.
We still manage an on-premise environment, however, many companies at the beginning believe that the cloud is invulnerable or that the manufacturer must ensure everything, which is not correct. With this implementation, it is possible to improve all current cloud security.
In the company I work for, it was implemented to be able to have governance in addition to good practices in our Microsoft Azure environment. It's a somewhat expensive tool, however, it is worth it to be able to solve all those improvements and avoid so many modern vulnerabilities, which have their point in cloud attacks.
How has it helped my organization?
As in our company we have environments that are hybrid in some cases and others totally cloud. We find in Check Point a reliable tool to improve security, implement regulations, and generate governance in cloud environments. In our case, we have a Microsoft Azure public cloud with enough resources which we need to protect. We achieved it together with Check Point.
It was possible to provide greater security to identities with admin access to the cloud - a critical part of IT management.
What is most valuable?
The most striking features are:
1- Identity protection generated through Check Point posture management, which is helping to prevent user theft or unauthorized access.
2- The governance that can be provided with this tool is very good since we have been able to implement good practices to avoid vulnerabilities.
3- The administration portal panel is very intuitive. It also generates scores based on regulations and good practices to go little by little with the recommendations, significantly improving security.
What needs improvement?
Some general improvement characteristics can be made, including the following:
1- Cost improvement. Some tools are quite expensive, and some non-equal manufacturers offer more comfortable capabilities at the cost level.
2- The guidelines to implement or to link with the clouds are not complete. Following them sometimes the task of implementing under the best practices of the manufacturer is not achieved.
3- Many Check Point guides are only available to partners and not to the general public. They can make a better impression by having them public and thereby helping the client.
For how long have I used the solution?
It's an excellent tool and is available in the Infinity Check Point Portal. Its main function is to centralize governance in the same administration portal and has been tested for more than a year to validate our cloud security.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously we used only Microsoft with Defender for Cloud. However, we wanted to have our security centralized. Check Point through the infinity portal achieves that feature.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's very important to have a reliable and good partner. The proactivity helps us to see the existing needs and check with Check Point what characteristics are required.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We chose Check Point as it provides integrated and centralized security, improving the effectiveness of security reviews.
What other advice do I have?
Even though the cost is somewhat expensive. I recommend this solution for users who use the public cloud.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Information sharing capabilities, and excellent web portal
Pros and Cons
- "Its monitoring and alerts are triggered by a failure or non-compliance with policies. It helps us to be able to act effectively and quickly."
- "The costs are high."
What is our primary use case?
We wanted to have a centralized and modern security environment, and it was possible to obtain it through Check Point Infinity.
It was possible to implement Check Point CloudGuard to take advantage of cloud intelligence to analyze modern threats. The global learning that Check Point obtains from all its devices for the improvement and confidence of security.
We currently use Microsoft Azure, which has several security features, all with costs, to perform governance, control, vulnerability improvements and regulatory compliance. However, we manage Check Point.
Forensics as your monitoring portal is exceptional.
How has it helped my organization?
The features included in Check Point CloudGuard help us a lot with the security of our Microsoft Azure cloud, which we successfully integrate with Check Point CloudGuard.
We have validated the score generated to improve security performance, thereby making improvements to avoid vulnerabilities.
The threat attack is reviewed and covered in an automated manner through cloud intelligence. Its alerts have kept us notified so that we can make the necessary adjustments. It offers incredible performance.
What is most valuable?
The most important characteristics are the following:
1- The detection of vulnerabilities in real-time. Its monitoring and alerts are triggered by a failure or non-compliance with policies. It helps us to be able to act effectively and quickly.
2- The use of Check Point ThreatCloud allows sharing of information between other Check Point devices to improve trust and form of protection against new threats.
3- Finally, its security application portals are very intuitive. It has helped us with the simple handling of Check Point CloudGuard.
What needs improvement?
Some possibilities of improvements for Check Point include:
1- Improving or creating best practices that can be generated publicly so that customers can have a package of policies, for example, that the manufacturer provides in addition to easy access to this material.
2- Improvement at the support level for management, handling and solution of cases in a better, faster, and more effective way. Sometimes the cases take a long time to be able to schedule a session and solve together with the client and support.
3- The costs are high. They could provide better costs for the client to make a simpler decision and not be affected by this issue.
For how long have I used the solution?
One of its characteristics is cloud intelligence. It was adapted to our centralization and public cloud requirements.
Our company already uses several centralized products in the Check Point Infinity platform. For more than six months, we have used CloudGuard.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used Azure Defender for the cloud. It is good, however, I liked more the form and the trust of Check Point.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is always important to have access to a partner to help you with costs, and requirements and to help you choose the best option within Check Point.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We previously validated some solutions. However, the features of Check Point CloudGuard were better suited to our requirements.
What other advice do I have?
It is an expensive solution. However, I recommend it.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Database Administrator at Ordina
Saves time, offers great advanced detection, and offers enhanced security insights
Pros and Cons
- "It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
- "The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."
What is our primary use case?
This software protects cloud data from security malpractices and enhances policy compliance.
It provides full data visualization of saved workloads and workflows that runs across the organization.
Posture Management provides data analytics from network security, enabling departments to monitor work processes effectively.
It has deployed automatic security models across the cloud computing infrastructure to enhance best data protection practices.
The database management team has fully benefited since we secured this product due to increased efficiency.
How has it helped my organization?
Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has created the best data management environment that can easily monitor workloads from the entire company networking system.
It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database.
It has saved the cost and time used before to monitor the security status of our infrastructure manually.
The modern platform has upgraded technological models that enhance faster data transfer from one server to the other.
It has allowed the IT team to scale and develop suitable security policies that track our daily activities.
What is most valuable?
The data governance features have comprehensive security features that block malware attacks.
The security automation functionalities accelerate performance and close all insecurity loopholes that can expose company data to unauthorized users.
The integrated customized security setups have complied with the set security rule sets.
The intelligence security insights enable teams to set reliable awareness that can caution them when there are negative data threats.
The dashboards provide summarized data representations that can be analyzed for improved performance.
What needs improvement?
The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands.
Tiny misconfigurations may not be detected in advance and can easily affect performance from some cloud servers.
When the platform is overloaded with a lot of tasks at the same time, it can delay results and lead to poor security responses.
The cost is high for small businesses that have no stable revenue-generation assets.
Security and compliance posture reports created from the audited results have confirmed that we are doing well and the organization has stable security tools.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product has maintained a stable performance from the time of deployment.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I am happy with scaling since there is comprehensive security compliance in the organization.
How are customer service and support?
We usually have a close and productive relationship with the support team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not yet switched to another software.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was complicated, however, the vendor support team provided effective guidelines.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented the solution through a vendor.
What was our ROI?
We have recorded a high ROI growth rate.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The setup cost is good, and the pricing depends on the size of the company.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We negotiated with other service providers. The best bid came from Check Point.
What other advice do I have?
We have achieved the set objectives with Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Google
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Helpful technical support, with a seamless setup and good integration with the public cloud
Pros and Cons
- "Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention."
- "Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."
What is our primary use case?
The product provides complete visibility of our cloud security posture. It supports servers and Cloud-Native Services. It provides a centralized solution for Cloud Security with risk and compliance management.
We required it to manage various compliance requirements including live ISO, SOC, PCI and it supports everything. Our Organization is in a hybrid structure and in it, we are using various AWS and Azure accounts. Earlier, we managed everything individually, however, after the implementation of it, we now manage everything from a single solution. The single solution helps with the system, network, and security administration.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution provides the complete visibility of Cloud Security, as well as a number of baseline policies and rules. This helps us to manage cloud posture with less effort. After implementation, it reduced administrative effort in terms of managed security over the cloud. Now, we are not dependent on individual tools for each account as well as cloud service providers.
After implementation, the team can generate reports from a single console for all compliance needs.
Auto Remediation is a very effective feature and it improves the need for manual intervention from the security and cloud administrator.
What is most valuable?
The baseline policy and the integration with the public cloud are very easy.
The number of compliance rulesets along with the baseline policy, support of cloud-native services, and license management are easy. Support of the CI/CD pipeline security (Code Security), Kubernetes, et cetera, is useful.
There are very helpful and various types of reports. Reporting features are very good and anyone from the compliance team can view/generate a report according to compliance support.
Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention.
Support of AWS Lamda and Azure Functions helps for any potential breaches.
What needs improvement?
Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required.
Integration with CI/CD is an important aspect as it is needed to secure the environment. Having it will help a lot.
Integration with Docker is also a key feature that needs some improvements.
Integration with other third parties and with SIEM is an important aspect that should be addressed.
Currently, it provides integration with Tenable, but it would be good if it had support other VAPT software as well.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Check Point CloudGuard Posture management for the last 8+ months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable and we have not found any gaps. It provides seamless integration with the public cloud.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a highly scalable solution and integration with the public cloud is very good. The way you can centralize the dashboard of entire cloud infra is a very impressive.
How are customer service and support?
Support has been good. We implement it with the help of OEM support and whenever we've required help we've received a good response.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Earlier, we tested other tools as well, however, the features which were available via Check Point are very good and the future roadmap is also very good in regards to cloud security.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is straightforward and seamless.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it with help of Check Point support. The rest was managed by our internal team as it's easy to handle.
What was our ROI?
Security is very important and gives us ROI from security itself. We also get an ROI as we have less administrative effort. We can see an ROI with the compliance and risk management on offer too.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The setup cost is very affordable and very easy. Integration with the public cloud is very easy. The licensing calculation is also very good and no manual effort is required.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated other tools like Rapid7, Qualys, and AWS native security tools, as well as Azure native security tools.
What other advice do I have?
It's a very strong solution for cloud security posture management and very effective for large and mid-size environments. Any organization moving towards the cloud would benefit from this.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
Vulnerability Management Cloud and Data Center Security Container Security Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) Compliance ManagementPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Qualys VMDR
Tenable Security Center
AWS Security Hub
AWS GuardDuty
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Varonis Platform
Orca Security
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the pricing for Check Point software?
- How inadvisable is it to use a single vulnerability analysis tool?
- What are the benefits of continuous scanning for vulnerability management?
- When evaluating Vulnerability Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is a more effective approach to cyber defense: risk-based vulnerability management or vulnerability assessment?
- What are the main KPIs that need to be implemented to have better posture in vulnerability projects?
- Which is the best vulnerability scanner tool?
- What are your recommended automated penetration testing tools?
- How do you use the MITRE ATT&CK framework for improving enterprise security?
- Can you recommend API for Tenable Connector into ServiceNow