Check Point Security Management Reviews

We needed a solution that had the things required to keep the company secure, like confidentiality, centralization, and a range of technological services. 

There weren't many other leading solutions that allowed us to achieve our goal of centralizing most security resources in one place to achieve rapid, unified management and control of our assets, achieve our annual goals, and provide the best service. 

Security Management gives us complete visibility into our security operations, allowing administrators to identify and address problem areas, reduce unnecessary costs, and improve efficiency. 

It offers detailed reports on network usage and security, which helps my company to monitor and control its security expenses. 

Many excellent solutions can be plugged into Security Management to help us prevent threats and manage network security, such as the firewall. The firewall is one of the most powerful because it enables us to guard against attacks and threats on our perimeter in real-time and centrally manage everything to maintain a robust security posture. 

Check Point's hybrid cloud integration needs significant improvements. These resources need to evolve as data transfers to the cloud increase, so hybrid cloud models are easier to implement. Better hybrid cloud integration would improve how we manage our security logs and provide our administrators with a low-cost solution that enables them to meet all our essential requirements. 

I have used Securit Management for a year.

Check Point Security Management is highly scalable. It can adapt to the changing needs of your business, allowing your business to maintain a set spend without going over it annually.

I rate Check Point Security Management eight out of 10. 

We are managing Check Point firewalls worldwide, and establishing VPNs between the main data centers in geographic regions and the other agencies worldwide.

We also establish VPNs between agencies and customers depending on the need. Several different VPN communities are used. We also establish VPNs with customers and partners with different firewall brands (Cisco, Fortinet, Juniper, etc.).

We manage security policies for more than 300 hundred Check Point firewalls by using security policy templates and models.

Check Point Security Management has improved the way to manage several VPN communities depending on the needs.

We now have the ability to centralize the management and administration of about 300 Check Point firewalls all over the world. We are now able to interconnect easily those firewalls by establishing VPN communities.

We are now also able to monitor the different VPN communities in real-time.

We can use a security policies template to apply to our 300 firewalls and this is really time-saving.

The ability to easily mount VPN between firewalls, depending on the needs (star, meshed, or combined architecture) and depending on the type of firewall has been helpful.

We appreciate the fact that we can monitor the version of the managed firewalls in order to plan the firewall upgrades over time.

I like that I have the ability to apply a security policy model and template to many firewalls, depending on the firewall usage and architecture (DMZ firewall, LAN firewall, etc.).

We also like the way we can monitor the firewall traffic and we use this feature very often to troubleshoot user traffic.

We would like to improve the upgrade process in order to do mass upgrades to firewalls and to be able to upgrade target firewalls at the same time.

I would like to be able to use Check Point Security Management in a way where it is hosted on the cloud. I'd like secured Security Management directly reachable from wherever you are with no need to install the Check Point client software on the laptop.

I would also like to have the ability to easily export the Check Point security policies in order to exploit the data in other applications and have more compatibility with other applications.

I've used the solution for 12 years.

The solution is highly stable.

The solution is quite scalable.

They have good support that is reactive.

Positive

I also use Fortinet due to Check Point legal restrictions. Check Point is banned in some countries.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We implemented it through a vendor team with a very good level of expertise.

We have a good ROI.

We also looked into Palo Alto, Fortinet, and Cisco.

One of our company's priorities was to have centralization of all the equipment in a single firewall. With the tools provided by Check Point, we were able to achieve it, and in this way we were able to centralize all the records.

With this implementation, we were able to make more centralized management and of all the rules. It was very comfortable to be able to configure them and manage them and thus be able to make the whole implementation more orderly and be able to carry out our organization along a good path of security administration

Check Point Security Management came to help us a lot. With this implementation, we were able to generate a firewall rule centralization and management. This helped our IT department to have an order in security and thus be able to centralize it efficiently across all our systems.

By having this implemented, our facilities' security has improved a lot since both employees and external users are audited before entering the network through Check Point Security Management and the rules that make these security filters possible, ensuring consistent protection throughout our infrastructure.

Check Point Security Management has a great feature that allows you to automate the request of the automated server. This helps us reduce the administrative effort of the IT department and thus give priority to other things like the security of the company or with the characteristic It provides us with centralization, which helps us with management.

The SmartConsole has provided us with excellent help with the application. It communicates with the administrator and allows us to create policies and also look at the traffic log.

The web administration tool that allows administration in the browser must be developed even more. When one tries to enter the panel, the loading delays us, which can be frustrating for users and reduce efficiency in daily operations.

They can also implement version updating to ensure that all users have access to the latest features and security patches seamlessly.

Another feature that could be improved is the export of configurations to .CSV. This would further simplify the management and compliance with rules, making audits and reporting much faster and more reliable for IT teams.

This solution has been used for approximately two year in the company.

The solution has excellent stability.

It is quite a scalable product.

The support experience has not been very good. We have had some problems with cases and meetings coordination.

Positive

There was no type of tool that would supply these qualities in the company previously.

The installation is easy. It is plug-and-play. However, the configuration must be done carefully.

The implementation was handled with the help of an engineer who had prior knowledge of the product. 

The ROI is there. Making an investment in security is always a very good idea.

Check Point offers a good price for its products. It is worth making the investment since this can prevent vulnerabilities.

Check Point was always our first option in terms of product choice. 

It is an excellent tool to implement in the organization.

We utilize the security management solution to oversee all our Check Point products, including firewall, IPS, and antivirus policies. It serves as our primary tool for managing all Check Point devices.

Check Point Security Management excels over Forti Management in daily operations, policy management, and graphical interface. It is easy to open and edit policies, search within them, and view logs.

The only issue is that, you need to install an application instead of managing it through a browser. Thus, it requires installation. Additionally, it can be slow when multiple users access the manager simultaneously. Even with increased CPU and memory resources, some performance issues may still occur when multiple users check simultaneously.

I have been using Check Point Security Management for ten years.

Sometimes, we encounter crashes while working on Check Point Security Management, necessitating application restarts. We also face connectivity issues with certain firewalls, making it less stable than other products.

The solution’s scalability is good ; adding more CPUs and memory can give you more gateways.

20 managers are using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

We currently have at least two or three cases open, and some are regarding demand. We struggle to find a good engineer who can truly help us instead of just sending some comments for us to run and provide feedback. They need to improve, especially in their initial client support.

Positive

The initial setup is complex.

Compared to Forti Management, Check Point Security Management involves much more work and is more difficult. You need to establish connections to all the firewalls manually, one by one. However, with the function manager, you point the firewall to the manager and accept it on the Management, and it's done. Additionally, you need to manage certificates on Check Point, making the process less straightforward than FortiManager. 

You depend entirely on the manager to edit the security gateway policies. If the manager encounters an issue with Fortinet, you can still access the FortiGate and delete policies. In Check Point, you cannot delete firewall policies directly on the firewall itself if you encounter a Management issue.

Deployment, including firewall synchronization, takes about four days to complete.

You usually need to create and use the VM Manager VM. So, you need to deploy the VM, configure the IPs, and install the Check Point console software. Then, you need to perform an SIP IT connection to all the firewalls to manage them. After that, you need to configure the firewall networks and public IPs. 

I rate the initial setup as seven out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

The product is more expensive than Fortinet. We need to pay the license for the Management. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

It enhances our daily operational efficiency. Therefore, all management personnel prioritizing working on Check Point policies over Fortinet would benefit. However, maintenance upgrades, backups, snapshots, and synchronization between primary and secondary management can become cumbersome. These tasks tend to be more challenging and time-consuming.

The learning curve for Check Point is quite steep. Sometimes, when we recruit new members to our company, they take a lot of time to understand how our Check Point system works, including the connection between the Management and the firewall, among other components. With Fortinet, it takes only two or three weeks for them to get acquainted with everything. With Check Point, they need at least three months to become accustomed to upgrades, managing policies, and maintenance of the Management system. So, it takes at least three or four times longer than with Fortinet.

AI is essential for correlating logs and presenting the ones that matter. They could strengthen how they present logs by giving more attention to the ones that matter most.

Check Point is easy to use, allowing users to drag and drop objects effortlessly. However, it's essential to note that deploying and maintaining the solution may require a bit more expertise than some competitors.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution mostly for policy pushing to other gateways.

We deployed the tool for a customer. They faced an attack, but Check Point did not allow it. Check Point does not allow unauthorized access to the network. It just sends a message to the person saying they are not authorized to access the network. The exceptions work very well. Most of the attacks go through the web path. The tool does a good job of securing the web path.

We can easily push the policies to any of our gateways. The solution manages the gateways. It works well with other products. It integrates well with Cisco products, too.

The tool is expensive.

I have been using the solution for the last two years.

The tool is very stable. The equipment is never down.

We have more than ten customers.

The support is very good. We get a response immediately whenever we enter a support request on the website. We do not have to wait for one or two hours. The team also offers remote support. The support provided by Check Point is one of the best in the market.

We have most of the products on-premise. We have only one client on a VM. Check Point offers training for their products. They usually send us a link every time they launch a new feature. Unless we go through the tutorials, it will be difficult for us to deploy the solution. However, it is easy to deploy when you know how to do it. It is easy to navigate if we have read about the gadget.

The tool is expensive. However, if we buy Check Point Security Management, we do not have to buy anything else. We get all the features we need in a single solution. We get value for our money.

If we want to troubleshoot, we just have to log in to the SMS. Everything is listed there. We just have to log in to the gateway we have an issue with. We need not go to the server rooms. I see no improvements needed in the product. The other gateways and SD-WAN could be improved. If someone wishes to use the product, they have chosen the best option. It provides security, reliability, and support. Though it is expensive, it is the best. It has all the features we need. The product is absolutely excellent. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

The Check Point Security Management is designed with a strong focus on cybersecurity, providing customers with detailed information on attacks and high-visibility threats. This is a major benefit, as it allows customers to stay informed on a daily basis. 

The most valuable feature of Check Point Security Management is the high level of visibility

Check Point could improve by enhancing the networking in their solution in order to align it with the existing network architecture.  

To perform a service cutover, such as migrating from one firewall to another or bringing up a new firewall, it is essential to thoroughly study and understand the customer's network architecture. This is a complex and challenging process that requires careful deployment and configuration. However, once the firewall is successfully connected to the environment, it becomes very robust and provides comprehensive cybersecurity that meets the needs of the customer.

I have been using Check Point Security Management for approximately 10 years.

The solution is stable.

Due to its complexity and the distributed nature of its solution, Check Point Security Management still faces significant challenges in terms of scalability. The networking port weakness previously mentioned also has an impact in this area. In order to address these gaps, enhancements need to be made to the product's scalability. For example, when performing software upgrades, the distributed solution can make even minor upgrades challenging due to the many components involved, such as servers, gateways, and management servers. It is crucial to make improvements in scalability to ensure that Check Point Security Management can meet the needs of customers who may require a larger or more complex solution.

They are selling multiple solutions that need to have their software maintained and their scalability at the same time with the advantage of the centralized consolidated unit, reflects poorly on the scalability. It's not only one solution. There are a lot of factors to consider in order to upgrade or add a new firewall to the lineup.

Their support could improve.

I rate the support from Check Point Security Management a six out of ten.

I have used Fortinet and other competitors.

The solution can be somewhat complex. It can be challenging to use, particularly during deployment. This is due to its use of distributed deployment, which requires the purchase of several components including security gateways, SMS servers, and a management server. While this may seem complex, the benefit is greater visibility.

The solution is expensive and there is an annual license.

Top companies in the firewall and software market include Check Point, which recently entered the hardware manufacturing sector. However, this move did not significantly impact its market share as other competitors were already offering more powerful hardware. As a result, the product became more complex, requiring separate handling of hardware and firewall components within the product. This adds additional layers, including network settings, connectivity, and firewall, which can make deployment and configuration more challenging for network engineers. Despite these challenges, Check Point is known for its stability and advanced threat prevention techniques, making it a valuable choice for cybersecurity.

We recommend smaller businesses explore alternative security partners, such as Fortineteen. Fortinet offers an affordable solution with all the necessary security features that customers need, making it a cost-effective option. For larger-sized companies we recommend Check Point Security Management to have visibility of their infrastructure.

I rate Check Point Security Management a seven out of ten.

When having multiple branches, there is the need to be able to manage several branches centrally to meet internal and external regulatory standards that become part of important criteria to manage security. 

Due to the number of branches that we must protect and safeguard, we were looking for a solution that would allow us to centralize simple and fast management that is as scalable as possible.

The Check Point R80 service has allowed us to unify and centralize the security policy. This makes us faster and more flexible when making a change in any of our branches. It's one of the friendliest services that can be managed and remains important in nature to our bottom line. It allows all administrators to understand and manage the communication between different sites, for example. Additionally, we have integrated these features with others that could also be used as security measures or MFA services.

One of the most important features, and one that I see as having organizational value, is the ability to enable services or communications that can be integrated with third parties. We can add additional layers of security to logins or configuration startups that we did not have before. 

It provides for capabilities and has allowed us to be more scalable. We now have greater management flexibility and the possibility to configure and connect to different branches. It has given us better centralization with greater features and security benefits.

In the future, I would like the platform to be able to integrate or manage appliances or third-party equipment. That would give us a management solution that is able to adapt to the technological changes that we have today. 

Maybe we could see if the brand or the services become commercial allies of other brands. I know that it is something that is requested a lot, however, better integration could be beneficial for the market and for users when purchasing a service in the market.

I've used the solution for three years.

We wanted a centralized administration console to allow us to manage more than one team inside or outside our organization. As a result of this need, we were looking for solutions that could complement us and provide effective and functional management of more than one team inside or outside the organization. 

It was then that we came across and used Check Point, a solution that allows us to integrate and manage all these teams from one place. Check Point offered us not only a centralized administration, but it also offered us and gave us added value in different services and features that can be integrated into the centralized administration platform.

Check Point came to give additional value to us as administrators and our organization. It allowed us to integrate more than one characteristic service under the same administration platform, such as antivirus services, real-time emulation services, and real-time detection, characteristics that really give additional value in a centralized management console being a console and also a strategic ally in our organization. These characteristics tell us that it is not only a service to centralize the administration - it is also a service designed to implement and add value to the security of any company.

One of the most outstanding characteristics of its centralized administration is its great computing power. The ease of being able to integrate more than one computer and manage and orchestrate them simultaneously and individually creates security layers for each one of them or different approaches based on the needs of the branches. We have an installation that is fast with an execution that is simple. It is easy to manage what each organization needs. 

I would like it to be the administrator of equipment or Next Generation firewalls (which have to be managed on this platform) and to be able to manage other services (like Harmony) that also belong to Check Point. We'd like to be able to manage them from the same platform. Although they are within the same portal right now, they are not managed in the same way nor are they from the same teams. It could be a very innovative future integration and will help to centralize this section while having the characteristics under the same management.

I've used the solution for about a year.

It is very stable lately. We've seen that the updates have made the solution apply changes faster and find it is more complete.

The platform has somewhat complex scalability. That said, it is still efficient - mainly when we have management or administration in what is known as HA or cluster.