A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Array APV Series comparison

A10 Networks and Array Networks are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. A10 Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Array Networks is ranked #18. A10 Networks holds a 5.7% mindshare in ADC, compared to Array Networks’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Read 28 A10 Networks Thunder ADC reviews

3,201 Views
3,073 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Array APV Series

Read 2 Array APV Series reviews

717 Views
703 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Array APV Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Array APV Series compete in the application delivery market, with notable differences in features and user preferences. A10 Networks Thunder ADC is favored for its robust support and affordability, making it a preferred choice for cost-conscious businesses. Array APV Series, on the other hand, is recognized for its feature-rich offerings, which justify its higher investment, thus attracting enterprises seeking high performance.

Features: A10 Networks Thunder ADC features advanced traffic management, strong security integration, and excellent scalability, suitable for handling high-volume traffic environments. Array APV Series is highlighted for its comprehensive application acceleration features, seamless integration capabilities, and a powerful architecture designed for optimizing high-performance applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: A10 Networks Thunder ADC is known for its easy deployment process supported by dedicated customer service, facilitating smooth implementation and continual support. Although Array APV Series may initially present more complexity, it benefits from a responsive and thorough customer service team that helps manage intricate deployment challenges effectively.

Pricing and ROI: A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers a competitive pricing model that presents an attractive cost-benefit scenario for budget-focused businesses, delivering favorable ROI through efficient spend management. Array APV Series, while involving a higher initial expenditure, assures significant ROI through its high-performance delivery and enhanced functionalities, alluring to businesses placing long-term value over up-front costs.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Array APV Series Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Array APV Series

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Array APV Series

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

18th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Thunder ADC is 5.7%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Array APV Series is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
A10 Networks Thunder ADC	5.7%
Array APV Series	1.8%
Other	92.5%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

Kartik Amin_

Cloud Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Focused on reworking interface and ecosystem while load balancing has improved uptime

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is quite solid, but there are some issues that I face, particularly with the user interface. A current issue is that the GUI is less polished than competitors. When compared against F5 BIG-IP or Citrix ADC, the GUI is not as good. The documentation and learning curve are areas that can be improved by A10 Networks. Compared with larger vendors including F5, Cisco, or Palo Alto, A10 has a smaller ecosystem. Although A10 Networks Thunder ADC supports cloud and Kubernetes, many enterprises now expect deeper cloud-native functionality. Improvement areas include Kubernetes Ingress maturity, service mesh integration, and auto-scaling intelligence.

Read full review

Gibert Fidel

Solution architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Enhancing user experience through efficient application delivery control

The primary use case of Array APV Series is for load balancing of the applications and their web applications It provides a better user experience when accessing the clients' applications, making it much faster for users when they are using the applications. The most valuable feature is the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As per my experience, the vThunder series of A10 Networks Thunder ADC is very easy to deploy, and the cost is also very reliable and justifiable."

"The ease of use is very good, it's very robust, and it just sits and works so well that we forget that it's there a lot of the time."

"The Deterministic CGNAT feature is valuable for us."

"Compared to F5, which I used about six years ago, the A10 is much easier when routing. You don't have to use the wildcard bits to route it between the different segments. It's much less troublesome to configure."

"The ADCs are pretty straightforward and easy to use. There is a GUI base where you can go in and see everything, but they also have a CLI base where you can use a command and get the information that you want, very fast."

"The advanced load balancing plus SSL offloading in A10 Networks Thunder ADC directly improves application uptime, speed, scalability, server efficiency, and user experience."

"A10 Networks Thunder ADC fits quite seamlessly into my overall workflow, and once it is set up, it became more of a set-it-and-monitor-it, autopilot mode component rather than something I constantly have to tweak."

"Overall, A10 ADC is pretty good, it's reasonably priced and easy to use."

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC pros

"Anyone considering Array APV should not hesitate to use the Array Network because it's very light and easy to deploy and the user interface is very easy to understand."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the server load balancing. Something that sets this solution apart from other products is that the hardware has a much higher capacity than other vendors. That's the edge of Array Networks. Their technical support services are also very good."

"The most valuable feature is the application delivery control, which includes server load balancing and global server load balancing."

Cons

"It scaled well for our numbers, up to 3 million subscribers for our most crowded region but I would like to see the same scalability numbers for the virtualized version as well."

"There are competitors that have more features."

"The user interface is what people complain about most of the time, particularly if they don't use it very often. Then they complain that it's a bit clunky."

"The solution does logging, but the logging capacity is really small. Because we have a bunch of traffic here, we usually get a logging-side warning that "This many logs were lost because of the heavy traffic." If the logging was better, that would be very good."

"A graphical dashboard for analyzing performance is needed."

"We are starting to do a lot with containers and how the solution hooks into Kubernetes that we haven't explored. I'm hoping that they have a lot of hooks into Kubernetes. That would be the part for improvement: Marketing use cases with containers."

"I believe the user experience and user interface could be improved considerably."

"Traffic flow issues are very difficult, as there's no means for us to analyze the traffic coming in or out of the appliance without technical support."

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC cons

"Technical support should be better."

"I would like to see more granular reporting and monitoring features, and I believe our clients want to see them as well. Also, SD-WAN would be a good addition."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of A10 Networks Thunder ADC depends on capacity and the customer's requirement. They have several offerings. They have different price models and options to choose from. Additionally, you need to subscribe to support for the hardware appliances."

"The price is good they are very comparative."

"For the hardware and license, we paid $35,000 per box, which was a one-time cost. Then, for the Gold Support on the two boxes, we pay $9400 annually."

"The pricing is a third of the price of the F5 competition."

"We did try out the solution’s Harmony analytics and visibility controller for its one-year trial. Due to the cost, we chose not to keep it onsite."

"As for the initial investment in the hardware, F5 and A10 are quite similar now. For the current A10 solution, the initial cost was about $36,000. As for annual support, the F5 solution would be between $10,000 and $12,000, while the A10 is $2,200 a year for support."

"We previously had F5 and switched because of costs."

"Pricing is one of the features of the product that influence customers to use the product."

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC pricing and cost advice

"I think the price for Array APV is very competitive, and some of our clients are very satisfied when it comes to the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would recommend A10 Networks due that it delivers high performance in a small form factor to reduce OPEX with significantly lower power usage, rack space, and cooling requirements compared to oth...

See all answers

Do you recommend A10 Networks Thunder ADC?

I do recommend A10 Networks Thunder ADC. It's very user-friendly, easy to configure, and flexible. It is a very useful solution - especially now, when a lot of employees are working remotely. I hav...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for A10 Networks Thunder ADC?

The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for A10 Networks Thunder ADC is a question for another department, not for me.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Array APV Series?

The pricing is rated at eight out of ten, indicating that it could be improved as the product is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Array APV Series?

The solution is usually optimized for client services, and they would benefit from it being a perpetual license, where they only need to renew the support, such as hardware replacement and technica...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Array APV Series?

The primary use case of Array APV Series is for load balancing of the applications and their web applications.

See all answers

Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 15% of the time

NetScaler vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 11% of the time

Radware Alteon vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 2% of the time

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC Competitors

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Array APV Series

Compared 28% of the time

NetScaler vs Array APV Series

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Array APV Series

Compared 13% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Array APV Series

Compared 11% of the time

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Array APV Series

Compared 9% of the time

More Array APV Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

June 2026

Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

May 2026

Download Array APV Series product report

Also Known As

Thunder ADC, AX Series

APV Series

Overview

A10 Networks Thunder ADC delivers efficient load balancing, SSL offloading, and enhanced security to ensure high application availability across cloud and on-premises environments. It optimizes performance and reduces costs while maintaining reliability during peak loads.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC supports enterprises in managing server load and ensuring secure, high-availability application delivery with features like DDoS protection and SSL offloading. Its cloud flexibility, operational efficiency, and advanced traffic management are key attributes, despite areas for improvement in user interface design, documentation examples, and third-party tool integration. Scalability, logging capacity, and automation for virtual appliances need attention, along with pricing adjustments for certain markets.

What are the most important features?

Load Balancing: Ensures even distribution of network traffic, enhancing performance and reliability.
SSL Offloading: Reduces the burden on servers by handling SSL encryption and decryption processes.
Security Enhancements: Provides robust features like DDoS protection for safer application delivery.
Cloud Flexibility: Adapts to both on-premises and cloud environments for versatile application support.
User-Friendly Interface: Prioritizes ease of use for efficient management, though improvements are needed.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

High Availability: Guarantees that applications remain accessible even during high traffic.
Scalability: Offers the ability to expand operations, addressing evolving enterprise demands.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes costs through strategic resource allocation and efficient management.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances performance through effective traffic management and resource optimization.
Comprehensive Licensing: Provides flexible licensing options to accommodate diverse organizational setups.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, A10 Networks Thunder ADC enables secure, efficient management of server loads and application delivery. Enterprises use its features to protect data, facilitate remote work, and maintain performance amid traffic spikes by hosting applications centrally, ensuring continuous business operations.

A10 Networks

Array APV Series offers dynamic application delivery solutions, enhancing network performance with advanced traffic management capabilities and robust security features.

Engineered to optimize digital experiences, Array APV Series incorporates intelligent load balancing, enhances application performance, and ensures efficient resource utilization. Its advanced architecture supports seamless scaling and high availability, crucial for demanding enterprise environments. Designed to handle modern enterprise requirements, it aids businesses in achieving greater resilience and efficiency through reliable application delivery services.

What are the key features of Array APV Series?

Intelligent Traffic Management: Efficiently routes and balances loads across servers to optimize application performance.
Robust Security Features: Provides comprehensive security to protect data and applications from cyber threats.
SSL Acceleration: Offloads SSL traffic to improve server performance and reduce latency.
High Availability: Ensures minimal downtime with advanced failover and redundancy capabilities.
Scalability: Seamlessly scales to accommodate growing network demands and performance needs.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Performance: Users report significant improvements in application responsiveness and speed.
Cost Efficiency: Integration leads to reduced operational expenses through optimized resource management.
Increased Reliability: Delivers consistent uptime and dependable application availability.
Security: Protects critical business applications from cyber threats, providing peace of mind.

Array APV Series finds successful implementation in industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. In finance, it strengthens transaction processing and compliance needs, while in healthcare, it ensures medical applications operate securely and efficiently. E-commerce platforms benefit from its scalability, supporting high traffic volumes and delivering reliable user experiences.

Array Networks

Sample Customers

123inkt.nl, Bentley University, Box, Brainshark, Buienradar, Capgemini, CGN/LSN & NAT64, Chengdu Telecom, Club One, Code Ready, CRC Health Group, Cyso, Deutsche Telekom, Earth Class Mail, Excite, FFF Enterprises, Florence County, Framingham State University, From30

SoftLayer, Trapp Technology, eClinicalWorks, eMeetingsOnline, YourMembership.com, Cash Depot, Needham Bank, State Bank of India, Yahoo Japan Financial Exchange, TechProcess

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Array APV Series

June 2026

Free Report: A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Array APV Series

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Array APV Series and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Array APV Series report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.