ACF2 vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Database Security category. Broadcom is ranked #16, while IBM is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 1.0% mindshare in DS, compared to IBM’s 31.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

ACF2

Read 6 ACF2 reviews

515 Views
103 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Guardium Data ...

Read 78 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection reviews

5,040 Views
4,133 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ACF2

IBM Security Guardium Data ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and ACF2 are competitors in data security. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection has a slight advantage due to its advanced analytical tools and streamlined deployment.

Features: IBM Security Guardium Data Protection offers robust data encryption, real-time monitoring, and automated compliance capabilities. It also provides comprehensive security through database activity monitoring and firewall features, making it adaptable to various environments. ACF2 focuses on strong access control, efficient multi-factor authentication, and seamless mainframe integration, appealing to those prioritizing system integration.

Room for Improvement: For IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, areas of improvement include enhancing user interface intuitiveness, expanding cloud compatibility, and reducing complexity in advanced feature deployment. ACF2 could benefit from improving the user experience for non-mainframe experts, expanding feature richness beyond integration, and enhancing its analytical tools to compete directly with IBM's offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer effective deployment models, but IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is notably more streamlined, reducing implementation time. IBM's customer support is perceived as more accessible and responsive, whereas ACF2 may require specialized mainframe knowledge for support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Guardium Data Protection has a higher initial setup cost but delivers significant long-term ROI through its comprehensive protection features. ACF2 presents competitive pricing but achieves a slightly lower ROI due to its focus on integration over feature richness. IBM offers better financial value concerning data protection expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACF2

Ranking in Database Security

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Security (6th)

IBM Security Guardium Data ...

Ranking in Database Security

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Database Security category, the mindshare of ACF2 is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is 31.8%, up from 31.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Security

Featured Reviews

reviewer1077621

IT Examiner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

A reliable, scalable product for security and auditing of our mainframe environment

It is a good product. It has been used for years. As long as it is configured correctly, it is a very stable product. It depends on how an institution or a company configures it. It depends on an institution's risk appetite. You need to make sure it is configured as per the concept of least privilege, and the logging features, detection and control mechanism, and other things like that are enabled. If you configure it to give access to the public, then there could be compromises. You should also have someone who independently checks it to make sure that it is configured keeping security in mind. If it has been configured for a while, when there are enhancements to the product or when you enhance it, you need to make sure that security is also looked at, and it is configured according to an institution's security policies. I would rate it a nine out of 10.

Read full review

Jared Ochieng

Information Technology Security Specialist at infoark

Used for monitoring database activity and tracking databases

The response time could be improved. Navigating support for the solution can be challenging, especially when finding the right contact for specialized issues. Improvements could make raising tickets and identifying the correct support channels easier. While general support information is provided, specialized support may require contacting different teams. We guide our clients through this process to ensure they know where to turn for various needs. Typically, we are the first point of contact for any issues, big or small, and then direct them to the appropriate resources. The quality of technical support largely depends on the expertise of the partner who implemented the solution. If you have a partner who is well-versed in IBM, the technical support is usually excellent. If not, support might be less reliable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Excellent real-time reporting that saves time and resources."

"We use this tool to quickly assign privileges to different users as soon as they come in."

"The NOACCESS by default is another very good feature. Also, access rules are straightforward, and easy to understand."

"Logging and monitoring are most valuable. It is for the mainframe environment, and it is at the forefront for security and resilience."

"I love their support. The support is great. They are number one."

"Guardium is easily integrated with other IBM solutions, a significant advantage and a key reason we chose Guardium. Both platforms share the IBM infrastructure, enhancing compatibility and integration. Additionally, Guardium offers a vulnerability analyzer, which is another compelling feature of the platform."

"It's one of the first to encrypt DB2 databases."

"The most valuable features of this product are activity monitoring on the database servers, discovery capabilities, and vulnerability scanning."

"The platform provides data protection from internal and external threats."

"It's allowing us to be more proactive than reactive on alerts and access rights and types of resources that are being hit. Before, there were a lot of different solutions, but this expanded that out and made it a more holistic solution. It provides centralization of monitoring, instead of multiple, disparate applications. It definitely allows more economies of scale, streamlining, less fragmented use."

"The investment return was good because IBM Security Guardium Data Protection provided significant security and compliance benefits."

"What I like about IBM Guardium Data Protection is that some of its features were deployed by collectors during the installation phase. The solution has collector and aggregator features, license installation, and even server patches that you won't find in other security providers. I like the collector-aggregator capabilities of IBM Guardium Data Protection where you install each component on separate servers, then on the aggregator, you collect all the logs on a central server or central console."

"It supports our audit compliance."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection pros

Cons

"Reporting can sometimes include false positives."

"It needs longer rules. The max rule is 32K."

"They can work on its ability to work in a distributed environment. It's a mainframe product. As many companies move to the cloud, depending on what cloud models they choose, such as a public, hybrid, or private cloud, it should be deployable. I am not sure if it can be deployed on those platforms. It has been there since the '50s or '60s, and it's still scalable. It has survived all these years, and it's scalable to many platforms, but I don't know about the cloud."

"I would like my team and me to be able to use simple browsers, like Chrome, to be able to access mainframe data and provision users using the browser."

"The integration part of the present solution is very complex and tedious. Plus it gives a lot of false positives which need to be eradicated over time."

"Flexibility could be improved."

"Personally, I would not recommend this product."

"Guardium Data Protection is far better in terms of external integration. But in terms of firewall features, like when you're blocking activities, it's as if Oracle AVDF simply has superior features. This is just from third-party observations, but the users of Oracle AVDF are saying that when it comes to the firewall and protection functionality, they're much more inclined to AVDF."

"It was difficult implementing it, configuring it, getting it up and running and in production. However, since then, I believe it has stabilized."

"Using the data in native Guardium is difficult, at best."

"One of the limitations that everyone who uses Guardium knows is its ability for back-end reporting. The ability to collect it sometimes is easier than the ability to retrieve it, use it, or give a good representation of it for incidence response or questions which come from the different people who want to use the data."

"Could be more user friendly; deployment is a little complex."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a very costly product."

"The biggest challenge is the cost associated with the product, and the cost of maintaining. Everything is not translated directly to the benefits we see. There are benefits, yes, but if I were writing the check, would I buy Guardium? No."

"We haven't talked much about pricing and licencing. But it is not cheap for sure"

"Reasonable cost but could be lower."

"For IBM Guardium, licensing is very simple and straightforward. There are no issues I can speak of."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is very high price, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"I would suggest to review the type of data, need for security, and if the organizational structure needs the options IBM Guardium provides."

"The price is good for the quality of the solution."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM Guardium Data Protection compare with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is a solution for database security from IBM that gives complete visibility, control, and analysis to secure sensitive data and comply with regulations. IBM S...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Guardium Data Protection?

I don't remember the exact prices, but Guardium is an expensive tool because it is targeted towards corporate enterprises.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Guardium Data Protection?

The features I like are the robust policies, which allow us to create customized monitoring based on specific activities.

See all answers

Comparisons

Top Secret vs ACF2

Compared 38% of the time

IBM Resource Access Control Facility vs ACF2

Compared 34% of the time

IBM Security zSecure vs ACF2

Compared 12% of the time

More ACF2 Competitors

Imperva SecureSphere Database Security vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 50% of the time

Oracle Audit Vault vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 19% of the time

DataSunrise Database Security vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Trustwave DbProtect vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 1% of the time

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mainframe Security

August 2025

Download ACF2 product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

August 2025

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection report

Download IBM Security Guardium Data Protection product report

Also Known As

CA ACF2

InfoSphere Guardium, Guardium, IBM Guardium

Overview

CA ACF2™ for z/OS provides innovative, comprehensive security for your business transaction environments—including Linux, UNIX and z/OS on System z—helping you realize the reliability, scalability and cost-effectiveness of the mainframe. CA ACF2 provides an Advanced Authentication Mainframe feature, system entry validation, resource control, auditability, accountability, and administrative control. In conjunction with distributed security solutions from CA Technologies, CA ACF2 provides mobile-to-mainframe enterprise class security and compliance management.

ACF2 Features

ACF2 offers some of the following features:

Authentication: ACF2 is used for authenticating users and granting them access to profiles and various resources on the mainframe.
Access Control: The solution provides resource control, allowing administrators to control who can access specific mainframe resources.
Logging and Monitoring: Organizations can easily track and monitor activities on the mainframe. This feature enables the creation of audit trails for follow-up and helps with security analysis.
Metrics and Reporting: ACF2 allows the configuration of tools to produce different types of metrics and reports. These can then be used by senior management for making informed security decisions.
Comprehensive Security: The solution provides comprehensive security for mainframe environments, ensuring the protection of valuable data assets. It offers advanced authentication, system entry validation, and administrative control.
Streamlined Administration: It simplifies the administration of mainframe security by providing streamlined management capabilities. ACF2 also enables administrators to monitor and adjust security policies and accommodate various organizational structures.
Scalability: ACF2 offers reliable and scalable security, allowing businesses to expand their mainframe environments while maintaining a high level of protection.
Compliance Management: Organizations can meet compliance requirements by providing auditability, accountability, and comprehensive security controls.
Integration: ACF2 can integrate with distributed security solutions from CA Technologies, providing enterprise-class security and compliance management for mobile-to-mainframe environments.
Flexibility: ACF2 allows flexibility in adapting security policies to accommodate different organizational structures and requirements.

ACF2 Benefits

Some of the benefits that ACF2 provides are:

Enhanced security and resilience
Streamlined administration
Reliable and scalable security
Comprehensive audit capabilities
Cost-effectiveness
Integration with other security solutions
Simplified identity and access management
Compliance management
Efficient monitoring and reporting

Reviews from Real Users

According to an IT Examiner at a financial services firm with 10,000+ employees, "ACF2 is extremely beneficial for the mainframe environment, and it is at the forefront for security and resilience."

Broadcom

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection automatically discovers and classifies sensitive data from across the enterprise, providing real-time data activity monitoring and advanced user behavior analytics to help discover unusual activity around sensitive data.

Deploy the solution to help discover regulated data in your data stores and use pre-built templates for regulations such as PCI, SOX, HIPAA, CCPA and many more, to streamline and automate compliance workflows.

IBM

Sample Customers

Sky, Rogers Communications

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

July 2025

Free Report: ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection report.

See our list of best Database Security vendors.

We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.