Akamai App and API Protector vs Comodo cWatch comparison

Akamai and Xcitium are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Akamai is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Xcitium is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. Akamai holds a 3.0% mindshare in WAF, compared to Xcitium’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Xcitium users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 29 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

4,499 Views
2,654 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comodo cWatch

Read 4 Comodo cWatch reviews

756 Views
605 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Comodo cWatch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Comodo cWatch and Akamai App and API Protector compete in the cybersecurity domain, offering protection for web applications and APIs. Akamai App and API Protector appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and robust security capabilities.

Features: Comodo cWatch focuses on real-time monitoring, incident response, and a web application firewall. Akamai App and API Protector offers advanced protections like bot management, DDoS defense, and a comprehensive security suite, catering to businesses with high-security demands.

Room for Improvement: Comodo cWatch could enhance its feature set for broader security needs and focus on advanced threat detection enhancements. It may also benefit from expanding integration capabilities. Akamai App and API Protector could streamline its setup process, improve accessibility for less technical organizations, and offer more flexible pricing options to enhance value perception.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo cWatch is known for its straightforward deployment and accessible customer support, easing integration into existing systems. Akamai App and API Protector requires detailed setup but benefits from a strong service infrastructure to assist with implementation challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Comodo cWatch presents a lower entry cost, appealing to budget-conscious businesses with its economical pricing and effective protection measures. Akamai App and API Protector, despite its higher cost, provides a high ROI by effectively detecting and mitigating threats, suiting organizations prioritizing comprehensive security over cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (8th), Cloud and Data Center Security (12th)

Comodo cWatch

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

26th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Akamai App and API Protector is 3.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comodo cWatch is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Akamai App and API Protector	3.0%
Comodo cWatch	0.9%
Other	96.1%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Gavin Pinho

Privacy & Risk Management Vice President, Information Security at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Has provided strong protection against evolving threats but still needs support for configuration fine-tuning

The standout features of Akamai App and API Protector are rooted in it being the Web Application Firewall, where all traffic gets scanned, including the implementation of web firewall rules, and after this phase, traffic proceeds through the BMP, which is Bot Management. Akamai App and API Protector exceeds expectations in terms of AI capabilities, and it genuinely combines a plethora of advanced features. The area in which Akamai excels compared to other competitors with a WAF is in threat intelligence, as threats continually evolve, requiring ongoing updates to backend algorithms to effectively capture smart bots, and Akamai's commitment in that regard is backed by an excellent team, while other providers are still catching up.

Read full review

Bernardo Murillo

Director De Netquatro at Netquatro

Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly

The solution allows me to change my logo. It gives me a white-label portal because I am a partner. OWASP has been the most effective in malware prevention. It can detect if the headers are okay and do FTP scans. We get alerts if we have some malware. It is removed very quickly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution easily identifies, delays, or allows business traffic."

"I like that the charges are all based on usage and labor costs. For the time that we spend onboarding almost 252020 FQDN, Akamai charges us only for the traffic usage, but it's only charging us for the labor costs for onboarding."

"The product is user-friendly."

"It enables us to move faster with new products because we have this layer of protection set up in our infrastructure."

"Everything will be handled by Akamai's system before it reaches our infrastructure."

"I can attest to its benefits in terms of understanding and mitigating threats...The solution's technical support team seems to be pretty responsive."

"The CDN and the WAF features are the best."

"Features like scalability and uptime are most effective."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"We get alerts if we have some malware."

"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."

"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."

Cons

"The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement. A lot of the WAF is really basic. For some products or some of our solutions, we need to run a second layer of more advanced WAF. If it had better layer seven protection then we would not need a second WAF."

"Support and the pricing need to improve."

"Akamai needs to focus on quickly responding to risks, even those that may potentially be of zero threat..Maybe some of the documentation is a little confusing. They have a lot of different places where you can go to get information, and some of the information is quite out of date."

"The performance of the cloud monitoring tool is low."

"The pricing could be reduced a bit."

"Customer support has room for improvement."

"It could have better analytics and reporting visibility in the OEM console."

"They are already very flexible, but room for improvement is there. Reports generation could be better and should be improved."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."

"The portal is a little slow."

"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Akamai is very expensive."

"The product’s price is high."

"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."

"The product is expensive, but it is worth the money."

"The price they are offering is quite reasonable for premium customers, but it's very expensive if you're a small and medium-sized enterprises."

"It's more expensive than others, but the ROI is good for large-scale infrastructure."

"Its price is slightly high. Every company has a justification for the high price. Overall, it feels worth the money based on how the service has been structured, but we do negotiate it."

"If you want quality, you have to pay the price. Its price is fair. Their account managers are also very helpful. They help you a lot with pricing even though they are working with Akamai."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

"Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, costs $7."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The price is higher than others. It could be about 80% to 70% more expensive than other tools. So, it’s not just a slight difference.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

There are no significant areas for improvement on the WAF side or for Akamai App and API Protector solution; they are comprehensive in their current state.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The main use case for Akamai App and API Protector is serving as the WAF, Web Application Firewall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Comodo cWatch?

The portal is a little slow. I have to wait for it to load all the information. CDN's performance must be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Comodo cWatch?

I use the solution to detect vulnerabilities in the site.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo cWatch?

Comodo cWatch’s price is very good compared to Cloudflare’s. The first level of Cloudflare costs us about $20. The next level costs $100. Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, cost...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Prolexic vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

Atomic ModSecurity Rules vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 31% of the time

SiteLock vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 19% of the time

Sucuri vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 11% of the time

More Comodo cWatch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

February 2026

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

CDN

February 2026

Download Comodo cWatch product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

cWatch

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

Xcitium

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch

February 2026

Free Report: Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.