Amazon EFS and Microsoft Azure File Storage are both prominent players in the scalable cloud storage market. Amazon EFS typically stands out for its scalability and user-friendly interface, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is preferred for its extensive integration capabilities with Microsoft services.
Features: Amazon EFS offers automated scaling, pay-as-you-go pricing, and seamless integration with AWS services, making it highly flexible and adaptable to various application needs. Microsoft Azure File Storage provides robust integration with Microsoft software, strong data synchronization features, and life cycle management which allows for efficient file transfers across storage tiers.
Room for Improvement: Amazon EFS could enhance its integration with non-AWS services and improve its hybrid cloud capabilities. Enhancing its UI for a more intuitive user experience and providing more flexible data analytics tools would be beneficial. Microsoft Azure File Storage could improve its performance in data restoration, offer more competitive pricing for non-Microsoft environments, and simplify the configuration of complex integrations to widen its appeal beyond Microsoft-centric clients.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EFS is noted for its easy deployment through AWS Management Console and offers responsive support channels. Microsoft Azure File Storage benefits from deep integration within the Azure ecosystem, facilitating deployment, along with extensive support resources that cater specifically to environments using Microsoft tools.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon EFS features a flexible pricing model based on actual usage, making it cost-effective for businesses with varying storage needs. Microsoft Azure File Storage offers competitive pricing and potentially higher ROI when combined with broader Microsoft cloud services, appealing to organizations invested heavily in the Microsoft ecosystem.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
As and when we require, they are able to provide solutions or guide us toward solutions.
Microsoft technical support is very prompt.
The perspective documentation is good.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
I rate the stability of Microsoft Azure File Storage as a seven out of ten.
We sometimes encounter glitches with bigger files, but everything else works as expected.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
Expanding the storage capacity would be beneficial.
Some chunking logics need to be better to address issues with processing bigger files.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.
The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
The AWS service is excellent security-wise, and I have seen some other features besides security, such as automatic scaling that helped us significantly.
It is satisfying our requirements with encryption and security features in place.
The storage solution saves time and makes document processing seamless.
In Microsoft Azure File Storage, the S3 bucket is the most helpful feature for my use.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol
Key scenarios:
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.