Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure File Storage are prominent cloud storage solutions offering distinct advantages. Amazon S3 holds the upper hand due to its higher scalability and better integration, while Microsoft Azure File Storage shines in hybrid compatibility and seamless collaboration.
Features: Amazon S3 provides high availability, flexible storage options, and extensive integration with AWS services. Microsoft Azure File Storage supports SMB protocols, achieves easy scalability, and offers robust security features.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 users desire enhanced usability, clearer billing structures, and improved cross-platform compatibility. Microsoft Azure File Storage users seek better support, improved performance for large file transfers, and enhanced user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 is noted for swift deployment and reliable support, despite a steep learning curve. Microsoft Azure File Storage is recognized for straightforward deployment and efficient customer service, with occasional performance issues noted.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 is acknowledged for its cost-effectiveness and significant ROI. Microsoft Azure File Storage is appreciated for competitive pricing but raises concerns about long-term cost efficiency.
Moving infrequently accessed data to cheaper classes like Glacier is beneficial for long-term storage at a lower cost.
I rate the technical support from Amazon for S3 a ten out of ten.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
The technical support for Amazon S3 is rated ten out of ten.
The perspective documentation is good.
Microsoft technical support is very prompt.
As and when we require, they are able to provide solutions or guide us toward solutions.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
The level of scalability allows storage to automatically scale on demand, without the need for manual intervention.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
There is zero latency or downtime.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
I rate the stability of Microsoft Azure File Storage as a seven out of ten.
We sometimes encounter glitches with bigger files, but everything else works as expected.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
I would like to see an increase in the data upload limit, similar to DynamoDB, where there is no data limit.
Some chunking logics need to be better to address issues with processing bigger files.
There is a limitation on the storage capacity, like four terabytes.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.
The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Security measures like encryption, access controls, and the block public access feature are also important.
It is satisfying our requirements with encryption and security features in place.
File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service.
In Microsoft Azure File Storage, the S3 bucket is the most helpful feature for my use.
Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.
Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol
Key scenarios:
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
