Google Cloud Storage and Amazon S3 are leading cloud storage solutions with notable differences. User reviews indicate that Amazon S3 may offer superior features, but Google Cloud Storage is recognized for its competitive pricing and ease of deployment.
Features: Google Cloud Storage is praised for its high availability and integration with other Google services. Users appreciate its data management tools. Amazon S3 stands out for its unmatched scalability, extensive APIs, and robust security features. While both offer strong capabilities, Amazon S3's feature set is generally viewed as more comprehensive.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing Google Cloud Storage's analytics tools and simplifying its data transfer processes. For Amazon S3, users often mention the need for better cost management tools and more straightforward documentation. Google Cloud Storage's improvements are seen as more immediate needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is often highlighted for its straightforward setup and excellent customer support. Conversely, Amazon S3's setup can be more complex, but its extensive documentation mitigates this challenge. Amazon S3 offers robust customer service, yet Google Cloud Storage's ease of deployment makes it slightly more appealing for businesses needing rapid implementation.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is frequently noted for its attractive pricing structure and faster ROI, benefiting startups and cost-conscious enterprises. Amazon S3, though more expensive, delivers high ROI through its advanced features and reliability. Despite the higher costs, Amazon S3's value proposition is justified by its comprehensive capabilities and user satisfaction.
Moving infrequently accessed data to cheaper classes like Glacier is beneficial for long-term storage at a lower cost.
I rate the technical support from Amazon for S3 a ten out of ten.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
The technical support for Amazon S3 is rated ten out of ten.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
The level of scalability allows storage to automatically scale on demand, without the need for manual intervention.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
There is zero latency or downtime.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
I would like to see an increase in the data upload limit, similar to DynamoDB, where there is no data limit.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Security measures like encryption, access controls, and the block public access feature are also important.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
