Google Cloud Storage and Amazon S3 Glacier are leading cloud storage services catering to different storage needs. Google Cloud Storage is favored for its high accessibility and varied storage classes, while Amazon S3 Glacier shines in long-term archival with cost-effective pricing.
Features: Google Cloud Storage offers high-performance data storage options, seamless integration with other Google services, and flexible storage classes. Amazon S3 Glacier provides cost-effective long-term storage, different retrieval options for infrequent access data, and specialized archival features.
Room for Improvement: Users of Google Cloud Storage often wish for better cost management tools, enhanced security features, and improved data retrieval speeds. Amazon S3 Glacier users desire faster data retrieval times, a more straightforward setup process, and enhanced usability for a broader range of users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage users find the deployment process user-friendly, supported by comprehensive documentation and robust customer service. Amazon S3 Glacier's deployment can be more complex due to its specialized nature, but users are satisfied with Amazon’s customer service in resolving issues.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage’s pricing is perceived to be high, but users find the return on investment positive due to its performance and integration capabilities. Amazon S3 Glacier is praised for its low-cost storage, making it highly appealing for long-term archival needs.
If AWS improves support and cost management, there would be fewer reasons for users to consider other cloud platforms.
As it is Amazon S3 Glacier, it is used only for archival purposes, so it is comparatively okay to use it, and we can save money compared to the standard which is high.
If it is a business plan, then the support we have is really good.
They provide documentation and resolve issues.
There is room for improvement in providing more skilled and comprehensive solutions.
I think the technical support by Google is good; the articles and troubleshooting are adequate.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.
Glacier has excellent scalability, with elasticity and security that meet industry standards.
Amazon S3 Glacier is infinitely scalable, with no issues on our end.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
I do not experience any stability issues.
We have not experienced any glitches or bugs.
I would rate the stability of Glacier for archival purposes at around eight out of ten.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
Support could be more robust, with a focus on providing comprehensive solutions even for novel issues.
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.
Another improvement is making Glacier available in all regions.
In the future, I would like to see additional features in Google Cloud Storage such as integrating Gemini to function as a chat for finding information, or OCR, or reading the content in my files for searching purposes.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
Compared to competitors like GCP, AWS can work on reducing hidden costs and overall pricing to retain startups and medium-sized businesses.
The storage cost is minimal, which is beneficial for archival purposes.
Amazon S3 Glacier is beneficial due to its lower cost.
AWS was the most expensive.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
The security features include object lock encryption and immutability options, so we can use this for backups.
Glacier greatly helps in managing storage costs by moving historical data to a lower-cost storage option.
We use KMS keys to encrypt data, which is our fundamental and only encryption method for files with Amazon S3 Glacier.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
It has helped optimize costs because I store it in free tiers, resulting in no charge.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon S3 Glacier | 11.5% |
| Google Cloud Storage | 7.9% |
| Other | 80.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
