Amazon S3 and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are leading contenders in cloud storage services. Amazon S3 generally excels in support and pricing, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage excels in features, making it worth the higher cost for some users.
Features: Amazon S3 is known for its scalability, integration with other AWS services, and cost-effectiveness. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers comprehensive data management, high security, and robust features.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 could benefit from more intuitive administrative tools, enhanced cost management features, and better documentation. Oracle Cloud Object Storage users suggest improvements in documentation, a smoother learning curve, and better usability for complex tasks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers reliable but slightly more complex deployment, countered by superior customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 is considered more cost-effective, with clear setup costs and good ROI. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has higher upfront costs but justifies them with extensive features and satisfactory ROI.
Moving infrequently accessed data to cheaper classes like Glacier is beneficial for long-term storage at a lower cost.
I rate the technical support from Amazon for S3 a ten out of ten.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
The technical support for Amazon S3 is rated ten out of ten.
When issues arise, it takes them at least three to four hours to respond.
I have a premium subscription for Oracle Cloud, which ensures a high level of support.
Oracle is more cost-effective than competitors.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
The level of scalability allows storage to automatically scale on demand, without the need for manual intervention.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
We can adjust the number of CPUs as per our need and reduce the load.
There is zero latency or downtime.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
The system is stable, especially when set up in a single region.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
I would like to see an increase in the data upload limit, similar to DynamoDB, where there is no data limit.
The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed.
I would like to know about integration with other Oracle Cloud services and whether it is easy to integrate Oracle Cloud Object Storage with other Oracle Cloud solutions.
I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
It is an expensive product.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud is comparable to other cloud providers.
We have to pay the price, and the cost is higher.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Security measures like encryption, access controls, and the block public access feature are also important.
High availability, a large dataset, and stability are our main criteria for using this solution.
I find manageability, scalability, and security of the product most valuable.
It also provides multi-region support, enhancing data accessibility and safety.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon S3 | 12.4% |
| Oracle Cloud Object Storage | 3.8% |
| Other | 83.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.
Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.
Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.
Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements
Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
