Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (1st)

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 9.2%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai

Managing Partner at Cloud Analytics Sdn Bhd

User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks

While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.

Read full review

PriyankShrivastava

Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture

A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement

There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers versioning, which lets us work together efficiently on a single document. What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is its ease of use and the integration of all Google services. It's very efficient for work."

"Everything I store in the solution is available on all of my devices."

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is that the backup feature is always on."

"Google Cloud is handy and easy to use."

"There is a free-to-use version. This is the version I use."

"Google Cloud Storage's most valuable features are that it's easy to use and navigate, and it's not expensive."

"The solution is flexible and very user-friendly."

"The solution is easy to use."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"I am totally satisfied with it."

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valuable for storing unstructured data, such as text documents and word documents."

"The technical support for the solution was very nice."

"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."

"We use it mostly in the cloud. It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

Cons

"User management could be better. It's complicated process to delete users and maintain the structure of documents created by deleted users."

"The solution must provide some accessibility features."

"The solution should improve its security and accountability."

"It's actually quite complete and we don't have any issues with the solution."

"The solution only allows so much space for free."

"The implementation is not as easy as Microsoft, and the process could be improved."

"I would like more storage available."

"It is hard to migrate to another product if we want to."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

"The first time setup for Oracle Cloud Object Storage is a little bit complex, but after implementation, there is no complexity."

"The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response."

"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."

"I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS."

"Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day."

"The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."

"For licensing, I pay yearly. The pricing is fine."

"Regarding the cost of the solution, Google offers its users a pay-as-you-go model pricing."

"The price could be cheaper."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a nine to ten out of ten."

"The solution was very cheap compared to other products."

"The tool is not expensive."

"We pay a monthly subscription."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."

"We have a yearly subscription for the product."

"During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month."

"Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

51%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

It is an expensive product. We do not use a monthly plan; instead, we opt for a quarterly or semi-annual licensing model, which we negotiate.

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Akamai NetStorage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 19% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Google Cloud Storage

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Public Cloud Storage Services

Download Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Google

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Oracle

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

Brinks

Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage