Amazon QLDB vs MongoDB comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 17.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon QLDB

Read 1 Amazon QLDB review

154 Views
63 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB

Read 79 MongoDB reviews

3,725 Views
2,961 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon QLDB

MongoDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QLDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon QLDB is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB is 17.4%, down from 26.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Balasubramanyam Kamarapu

Technical Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard

The product enables the users to query results faster. It maintains all the versions of the changes done on a specific node. A traditional blockchain would take time, but Amazon QLDB is a bit faster. We have to do many operations in blockchain to read data, but QLDB comes with an easy syntax. The product provides a nice dashboard to view all the information.

Read full review

Uzair Faruqi

Head Of Analytics at Mjunction Services

Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment

One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product enables the users to query results faster."

"The aggregation framework is really good, allowing a developer to build very complex queries."

"We decided to work with MongoDB as its interface is easier to understand and more universal."

"MongoDB is flexible and it allows other applications to be added."

"The tool is also user-friendly."

"MongoDB is fast and efficient."

"One of the biggest benefits is the speed and flexibility of the documents, especially when it comes to modifications."

"It is easy to set up."

"It is very fast - faster than an SQL or MySQL Server."

More MongoDB pros

Cons

"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."

"Lacks sufficient scalability and elasticity."

"It has certain limitations when it comes to handling hierarchical data, enforcing relationships, and performing complex joins, which should be taken into account when designing databases for applications with intricate data requirements."

"I feel that most people don't know a lot about MongoDB, so maybe they could add some more documentation and tutorials."

"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."

"There was a need for integrating relational database capabilities, however, MongoDB has introduced a relational converter that allows conversion between SQL and NoSQL."

"The stability could be improved."

"I have found the solution difficult to operate as an administrator."

"The performance of the solution could be improved."

More MongoDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."

"It's a community edition, so we do not pay anything."

"I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me."

"MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive."

"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."

"The product is affordable."

"It is rather expensive."

"MongoDB is a bit expensive compared to its competitors."

"If you want support with the solution you will need to purchase a license and not use the open-source version. The license is a little expensive."

More MongoDB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QLDB?

The product enables the users to query results faster.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QLDB?

The product is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QLDB?

The product should enable users to import data from various databases. It would be a nice additional improvement. It should also provide more instances.

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

We use the free version of MongoDB, so there are no licensing costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

There is room for improvement in integrating MongoDB with agentive AI solutions. While solutions for other databases like SQL or PostgreSQL ( /products/postgresql-reviews ) already exist, MongoDB r...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

InfluxDB vs MongoDB

Compared 16% of the time

Couchbase vs MongoDB

Compared 11% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Qdrant vs MongoDB

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

May 2025

Download Amazon QLDB product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB

May 2025

Download MongoDB product report

Also Known As

Amazon Quantum Ledger Database

No data available

Overview

Amazon QLDB is a fully managed ledger database that provides a transparent, immutable, and cryptographically verifiable transaction log ‎owned by a central trusted authority. Amazon QLDB tracks each and every application data change and maintains a complete and verifiable history of changes over time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB is a flexible and scalable NoSQL database solution that efficiently handles both structured and unstructured data. It is known for its ease of use, JSON capabilities, and efficient data handling, making it ideal for developer-friendly environments.

MongoDB stands out with features like sharding, geospatial indexing, and its open-source nature. Users find it fast and appreciate its seamless integration into different applications. Despite being powerful, it remains straightforward to set up and use, bolstered by a clustering and aggregation framework that enhances its functionality. While generally appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and broad application compatibility, there is room for improvement in security, enterprise integration, and the creation of more robust training and documentation resources. Enhancing performance and adding support for traditional relational database concepts could also prove beneficial.

What are MongoDB's most important features?

Scalability: Efficiently manages growing data volumes.
Flexibility: Supports structured and unstructured data with ease.
Sharding: Distributes data across multiple servers.
Geospatial Indexing: Enables location-based data handling.
Open-source: Wide community support and customization.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall database management expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies database setup and maintenance.
Developer-friendly: Accelerates application development with supportive tools.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to evolving business requirements.

MongoDB finds widespread application across industries like healthcare, logistics, and telecommunications. It efficiently powers IoT platforms, data analytics, and document management systems. Its schema flexibility and JSON storage capabilities make it ideal for real-time processing and multi-server databases, essential for handling large-scale data volumes in modern applications.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

accenture, digital asset, health direct, klarna, osano, realm, smaato, splunk, wipro, zilliant

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.