Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon QLDB vs MongoDB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QLDB
Ranking in NoSQL Databases
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MongoDB
Ranking in NoSQL Databases
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon QLDB is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB is 18.9%, down from 25.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NoSQL Databases
 

Featured Reviews

BK
A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard
The product enables the users to query results faster. It maintains all the versions of the changes done on a specific node. A traditional blockchain would take time, but Amazon QLDB is a bit faster. We have to do many operations in blockchain to read data, but QLDB comes with an easy syntax. The product provides a nice dashboard to view all the information.
Uzair Faruqi - PeerSpot reviewer
Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment
One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product enables the users to query results faster."
"It is very fast - faster than an SQL or MySQL Server."
"Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB."
"MongoDB is scalable and stable. The initial setup is very easy, and deployment and maintenance can be done by one person."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."
"The most valuable feature is the geometric information done with GeoJSON."
"The solution's most important aspect is its seamless database."
"MongoDB is fast and efficient."
"The aggregation framework is really good, allowing a developer to build very complex queries."
 

Cons

"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"MongoDB should improve its data loading part."
"It isn't easy to recognize entities with MongoDB."
"We'd like information about client onboarding experience and success stories. It would help to have something to show to internal stakeholders."
"It would help if MongoDB offered a light solution for small projects."
"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."
"The stability could be improved."
"It would be much more useful if I have an admin user and a password."
"It has certain limitations when it comes to handling hierarchical data, enforcing relationships, and performing complex joins, which should be taken into account when designing databases for applications with intricate data requirements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."
"MongoDB's pricing is not reasonable, but it is not as expensive as the others."
"MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive."
"The solution is open source, so it is free."
"Our customers pay for yearly licenses for MongoDB."
"There are different licenses available to be purchased, such as individual, premium, or enterprise."
"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."
"I believe that the licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
15%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QLDB?
The product enables the users to query results faster.
What needs improvement with Amazon QLDB?
The product should enable users to import data from various databases. It would be a nice additional improvement. It should also provide more instances.
What do you like most about MongoDB?
MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?
We use the free version of MongoDB, so there are no licensing costs.
What needs improvement with MongoDB?
There is room for improvement in integrating MongoDB with agentive AI solutions. While solutions for other databases like SQL or PostgreSQL ( /products/postgresql-reviews ) already exist, MongoDB r...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Amazon Quantum Ledger Database
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

accenture, digital asset, health direct, klarna, osano, realm, smaato, splunk, wipro, zilliant
Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.