Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Anomali and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Anomali is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5, while Trellix is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8. Anomali holds a 2.8% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Anomali users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Anomali

Read 4 Anomali reviews

3,503 Views
490 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

2,271 Views
1,113 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Anomali

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response and Anomali are competing products in the cybersecurity market, enhancing network security. Based on the data, Trellix is favored for its robust features, while Anomali is noted for its precision and comprehensive threat intelligence.

Features: Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat detection, real-time analytics, and an intuitive approach to identifying suspicious activities. Its integration capabilities are extensive, catering to various security platforms. Anomali is known for its extensive threat intelligence database, offering superior predictive analysis and a focus on threat intelligence-driven security.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance its capability in avoiding initial response delays in anomaly detection, improve the user interface for better navigation, and offer more granular threat reporting. Anomali can increase the depth of its data set for broader threat modeling, streamline the automation features for easier workflow management, and enhance integration for better interaction with third-party security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers straightforward deployment with flexible customization options, supported by responsive customer service known for quick response times. Anomali, with its cloud-based model, is easily deployed and offers strong support for existing systems, valued for its guidance in integrating threat intelligence effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Network Detection and Response entails a higher upfront cost but delivers significant ROI through its comprehensive feature set and robust usage capabilities. Anomali provides a more affordable initial setup cost, offering solid ROI by focusing on threat intelligence. Despite its higher initial cost, Trellix's extensive features and flexibility can justify the investment for organizations that require a broader security coverage, while Anomali appeals to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and intelligence capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Anomali vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Anomali vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Anomali

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (25th)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Anomali is 2.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 3.9%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Network Detection and Response	3.9%
Anomali	2.8%
Other	93.3%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

ChrisCollins

Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy

Enables automated threat intelligence sorting and enhances proactive threat hunting capabilities

You have to have at least a threat intelligence background or a SOC analyst background to use it, as that's the information you'll dig around with in there. If you don't have that kind of knowledge, it probably can be a little hard to use, but they do provide training. They offer training not only for how to use the platform but also some basic threat intelligence training to explain what these things are and what these terms mean. My company is a customer of Anomali. I would recommend it to other people. I would advise making sure you don't pick it without testing other products and have your use cases well thought out and documented before testing, so you know it will solve the problems you're trying to address. Keep an open mind with it and realize that whatever you can dream of, you can probably do with the platform. Overall, I would rate Anomali an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Anomali is the threat modeling capability."

"We now have a very robust collection of threat intelligence based on the capabilities that Anomali provides."

"The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."

"I have found Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) very useful and concise. The solution is easy to use."

"The installation phase was easy."

"The product is very easy to configure."

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the network security module."

"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."

"Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall, and if you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly."

"Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats."

"Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"A lot of tools can give you many features, such as CTI intelligence and a tax service reduction. However, many people are combining different tools together to have more capabilities. It is up to the consumer whether they want to have multiple tools or have one tool that serves the purpose. Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."

"Support in the past has been top-notch, but recent trends indicate that it has taken a back seat, as we often don't get answers for days."

"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."

"An area for improvement is the intelligence sharing within the Anomali community. The tagging system can be inconsistent, as any company can use any tags for their reporting."

"As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."

"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."

"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."

"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier."

"It is an expensive solution."

"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."

"We'd like the potential for better scaling."

"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When comparing the price of Anomali Enterprise to other solutions it is in the medium to high range. However, I am satisfied with the price."

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"The tool is a bit pricey."

"The pricing is a little high."

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Anomali ThreatStream?

An area for improvement is the intelligence sharing within the Anomali community. The tagging system can be inconsistent, as any company can use any tags for their reporting. Combining all aliases ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Anomali ThreatStream?

I use Anomali ( /products/anomali-reviews ) for threat hunting, threat collection, operationalization of intelligence, such as indicators of compromise (IOCs), and dissemination of reports for repo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Anomali ThreatStream?

For new users, I recommend taking the training provided by Anomali as it is very well articulated. I advise reading the user manual and taking the instructor-led training sessions from the customer...

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Comparisons

Recorded Future vs Anomali

Compared 8% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Anomali

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Anomali

Compared 6% of the time

ThreatQ vs Anomali

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Anomali

Compared 3% of the time

More Anomali Competitors

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 9% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

December 2025

Download Anomali product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

January 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

Match, Lens, ThreatStream, STAXX, Anomali Security Analytics

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

Anomali delivers advanced threat intelligence solutions designed to enhance security operations by providing comprehensive visibility into threats and enabling real-time threat detection and management.

Anomali stands out in threat intelligence, offering an innovative platform that integrates data to identify and analyze threats effectively. It enables teams to streamline threat detection processes and respond to incidents with increased agility. With a focus on accuracy and efficiency, Anomali supports cybersecurity professionals in making informed decisions to safeguard their networks consistently.

What are Anomali's core features?

ThreatStream: A platform that aggregates threat intelligence feeds to enhance threat assessment.
Match: An automated detection feature that matches internal log data against threat intelligence insights.
Link: Provides graphical visualization for threat analysis, helping to understand threat vectors better.
STAXX: A lightweight tool for collecting and analyzing open-source threat intelligence.

What are the key benefits and ROI of using Anomali?

Improved Threat Detection: Streamlined processes lead to faster identification and response to threats.
Resource Efficiency: Automation reduces manual tasks, allowing security teams to focus on strategic activities.
Better Decision Making: Provides actionable insights that enable more informed security strategies.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Anomali is implemented to address specific challenges like compliance and data protection. By using this platform, organizations gain the ability to adapt to evolving threats, ensuring robust and adaptable security postures tailored to industry demands.

Anomali

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Anomali vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2025

Free Report: Anomali vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Anomali vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anomali vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.