Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is 9.6%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 4.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN9.6%
HPE Wireless WAN4.0%
Other86.4%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Edward Zeng - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at Auckland University of Technology
Faced deployment successfully but configuration complexity needs to be reduced
I think the layout is a bit complicated. There are so many different layers to set up, and it is very easy to miss out or make configuration mistakes because they are hierarchical. You need to be very careful about which one has been in use. Aruba ClearPass is also complicated as well. If Aruba could combine all of their products together, it would be great to have a single pane of glass. Currently, the Aruba sensor does not work together with other products. There is no single pane of glass for location configuration, so you need to log into different websites to check the user experience.
DineshDas - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Network Services at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Centralized features have simplified deployment and improved day-to-day network management
One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices. I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity. I use centralized management features such as WLC. They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites. This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool. Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is overall a great product. The stability is one of the best aspects of it. It's also useful in helping control multiple access points. You don't need to have a physical controller like other brands."
"The initial setup of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be done quickly, and everything functions smoothly."
"The newest features and options allow us to use leading-edge functionality like the central mobility controller which can manage everything instead of having the independent or basic cellular kind of setup."
"The installation process was easy."
"We haven't experienced any glitches so far, so it is a very stable program."
"We don't know this product very well yet, but what we have used so far and what we like are user control, bandwidth, and access."
"Its most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The solution is easy to use."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"I like their features, such as reliability and high availability."
"HP Wireless offers competitive pricing compared to Cisco and Fortinet."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"It's easy to use."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
 

Cons

"The management software. The graphical user interface could do with some improvement, a bit of decluttering."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"There are so many different layers to set up, and it is very easy to miss out or make configuration mistakes because they are hierarchical."
"We do not have direct access to Aruba’s Mesh portal."
"The support needs improvement because it is not very good in terms of response time."
"Technical support is important to me and I feel that it is something that can be improved."
"The solution currently has a Windows update problem."
"The solution has bugs. It really has bugs, and you have to wait until it happens, then you realize it."
"There are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features that other products have."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest ,and ten is the highest."
"It is a costly solution."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is pretty cost-efficient than Cisco ISE when my company did a PO, but for a single-party tender, its pricing was on the higher side, so it depends. I rate the pricing for Aruba Networks Wireless WAN as six out of ten."
"The pricing of the product is pretty good."
"I rate the pricing a seven or eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest and one is the cheapest."
"The product's price is within range since it has a lower price."
"It is more affordable than Cisco."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
"Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
"The price is perfect for me."
"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Marketing Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Aruba Network Wireless WAN?
I recommend Aruba Networks Wireless WAN. I have been using Aruba for approximately a decade. It has a great centralized management system, which means we don’t need wireless LAN controllers at ever...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Networks Wireless WAN?
The pricing is not cheap. Compared to Cisco, it is a bit cheaper, but still not enough to switch over to Aruba. The benefits are not sufficient.
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently. However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Pittsburgh Golf Club, Rio Rancho Public Schools, Amwaj Rotana - Jumeirah Beach Residence - Dubai, Trevecca Nazarene University
Bell Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.