Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is 8.7%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 3.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN8.7%
HPE Wireless WAN3.6%
Other87.7%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Edward Zeng - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at Auckland University of Technology
Faced deployment successfully but configuration complexity needs to be reduced
I think the layout is a bit complicated. There are so many different layers to set up, and it is very easy to miss out or make configuration mistakes because they are hierarchical. You need to be very careful about which one has been in use. Aruba ClearPass is also complicated as well. If Aruba could combine all of their products together, it would be great to have a single pane of glass. Currently, the Aruba sensor does not work together with other products. There is no single pane of glass for location configuration, so you need to log into different websites to check the user experience.
DineshDas - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Network Services at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Centralized features have simplified deployment and improved day-to-day network management
One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices. I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity. I use centralized management features such as WLC. They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites. This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool. Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Aruba makes use of "Direct Tunnel" as its best security feature."
"I like the way that it integrates with the ClearPass security system on-site."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The installation process was easy."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management capability. You don't have to have wireless LAN controllers at every location."
"It's quite stable."
"It’s very stable and reliable."
"The technical support by HP for Aruba products is good."
"The performance is good."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"HPE Wireless WAN provides reliable connectivity."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The reliability is good."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"When it comes to configuring rules for file security tests, any issues that arise can be referred to as "glitches". Despite the extensive configurations required, the process itself is not overly complicated."
"The only issues are the configuration problems that impact the stability of the solution."
"It would be better for customers if Aruba provided more license options, like 5-year licenses"
"We have had stability issues with some types of portable devices."
"Support is not good...The support can be improved, especially in India, since whenever I require support, it takes some time."
"The initial setup is complex."
"There are so many different layers to set up, and it is very easy to miss out or make configuration mistakes because they are hierarchical."
"There are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features that other products have."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"Mostly, I face problems with client connectivity and some devices, like Android."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN depends on how you buy it. From a pricing perspective, if you choose to buy Aruba Networks Wireless WAN as an MRC, it's dependent upon the radio and the solution that you choose what your MRC is. If you choose to buy it outright, they're competitive with their competitors, and they're probably four percent or five percent lower than their largest competitor."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"The pricing is cheaper in comparison to similar products."
"I rate the pricing a seven or eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest and one is the cheapest."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest ,and ten is the highest."
"The licenses are available as both perpetual or yearly."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is cheaper than Cisco, and the web experience is great."
"The pricing of the product is pretty good."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
"I find the price to be reasonable."
"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
"The price is perfect for me."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Marketing Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Aruba Network Wireless WAN?
I recommend Aruba Networks Wireless WAN. I have been using Aruba for approximately a decade. It has a great centralized management system, which means we don’t need wireless LAN controllers at ever...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Networks Wireless WAN?
The pricing is not cheap. Compared to Cisco, it is a bit cheaper, but still not enough to switch over to Aruba. The benefits are not sufficient.
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently. However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Pittsburgh Golf Club, Rio Rancho Public Schools, Amwaj Rotana - Jumeirah Beach Residence - Dubai, Trevecca Nazarene University
Bell Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.