Ataccama ONE Platform vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

Ataccama and erwin by Quest are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while erwin by Quest is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Ataccama holds a 2.5% mindshare in DG, compared to erwin by Quest’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of erwin by Quest users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

1,300 Views
846 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Read 18 erwin Data Intelligence by Quest reviews

3,446 Views
915 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ataccama ONE Platform and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest compete in data management and governance. While Ataccama offers scalability and adaptability in a cohesive suite, erwin is favored for its detailed data lineage and governance capabilities.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform includes data quality management, master data management, and collaborative data stewardship. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is recognized for metadata management, advanced data cataloging, and enterprise architecture integration.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama could enhance its data lineage capabilities, refine basic metadata handling, and improve initial setup procedures. erwin might benefit from simplifying user interface, increasing flexibility in deployments, and reducing its learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE Platform supports cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments with robust technical assistance. erwin offers streamlined cloud deployment and extensive training resources for quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE Platform presents a higher initial cost but delivers ROI through comprehensive, integrated features. erwin Data Intelligence offers competitive pricing with faster ROI, driven by its specialized tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (5th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th)

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Ranking in Data Governance

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is 2.2%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

Roy Pollack

Advisor Application Architect at CPS Energy

The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.

We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"Data Intelligence has provided more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term. We have linked three critical layers of data, providing us with an end-to-end lineage at the column level."

"The interface is easy to use. I also like Erwin's automatic data classification and data quality checks."

"There is a wide range of widgets that enables the user to find the proper information quickly. The presentation of information is something very valuable."

"The possibility to write automation scripts is the biggest benefit for us. We have several products with metadata and metadata mapping capabilities. The big difference when we were choosing this product was the ability to run automation scripts against metadata and metadata mappings. Right now, we have a very high level of automation based on these automation scripts, so it's really the core feature for us."

"It is a central place for everybody to start any ETL data pipeline builds. This tool is being heavily used, plus it's heavily integrated with all the ETL data pipeline design and build processes. Nobody can bypass these processes and do something without going through this tool."

"Being able to capture different business metrics and organize them in different catalogs is most valuable. We can organize these metrics into sales-related metrics, customer-related metrics, supply chain-related metrics, etc."

"The data management is, obviously, key in understanding where the data is and what the data is. And the governance can be done at multiple levels. You have the governance of the code sets versus the governance of the business terms and the definitions of those business terms. You have the governance of the business data models and how those business data models are driving the physical implementation of the actual databases. And, of course, you have the governance of the mapping to make sure that source-to-target mapping is done and is being shared across the company."

"The biggest benefit with erwin DI is that I have a single source of truth that I can send anybody to. If anybody doesn't know the answer we can go back to it. Just having a central location of business rules is good."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pros

Cons

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Data movement is a pain."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"We still need another layer of data quality assessments on the source to see if it is sending us the wrong data or if there are some issues with the source data. For those things, we need a rule-based data quality assessment or scoring where we can assess tools or other technology stacks. We need to be able to leverage where the business comes in, defining some business rules and have the ability to execute those rules, then score the data quality of all those attributes. Data quality is definitely not what we are leveraging from this tool, as of today."

"Everything about Data Intelligence is complex. Though we've used the tool for five years, we're still only using about 30 to 40 percent of its capabilities. It would be helpful if we could customize and simplify the user interface because there are so many redundant things."

"The solution's Arabic language processing is limited. The results are limited when you use the interface in Arabic."

"The versioning can sometimes be confusing because we use the publishing feature for the mapping. Technical analysts sometimes have two versions, and they should know that the public version is the correct one."

"One big improvement we would like to see would be the workflow integration of codeset mapping with the erwin source to target mapping. That's a bit clunky for us. The two often seem to be in conflict with one another. Codeset mappings that are used within the source to target mappings are difficult to manage because they get locked."

"It's a little bit clunky. I think a lot of these features were bolted on, and they don't necessarily transition smoothly in the interface. I would like to see a little more cohesion."

"There is room for improvement with the data cataloging capability. Right now, there is a list of a lot of sources that they can catalog, or they can create metadata upon, but if they can add more then that would be a good plus for this tool."

"Really huge datasets, where the logical names or the lexicons weren't groomed or maintained well, were the only area where it really had room for improvement. A huge data set would cause erwin to crash. If there were half a million or 1 million tables, erwin would hang."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required."

"The whole suite, not just the DI but the modeling software, the harvester, Mapping Manager — everything we have — is about $100,000 a year for our renewals. That works out to each module being something like $8,000 to $10,000."

"erwin's pricing was cheaper than its competitors."

"The solution is aggressively priced."

"Smart Data Connectors have some costs, and then there are user-based licenses. We spend roughly $150,000 per year on the solution. It is a yearly subscription license that basically includes the cost for Smart Data Connectors and user-based licenses. We have around 30 data stewards who maintain definitions, and then we have five IT users who basically maintain the overall solution. It is not a SaaS kind of operation, and there is an infrastructure cost to host this solution, which is our regular AWS hosting cost."

"The price is reasonable and competitive. When you get into forward and reverse-engineering, the cost could go up. However, if you are a large organization, you would probably be able to access different packages. If, however, you don't need forward and reverse-engineering, then the price is relatively cheap."

"The licensing cost is around $7,000 for user. This is an estimation."

"erwin was at a good price. The federal government wouldn't buy something if the pricing wasn't good."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 21% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 31% of the time

Collibra Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 22% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 10% of the time

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

May 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

May 2025

Download erwin Data Intelligence by Quest product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

The erwin Data Intelligence Suite (erwin DI) combines data catalog and data literacy capabilities for greater awareness of and access to available data assets, guidance on their use, and guardrails to ensure data policies and best practices are followed. Automatically harvest, transform and feed metadata from a wide array of data sources, operational processes, business applications and data models into a central data catalog. Then make it accessible and understandable within context via role-based views. This complete metadata-driven approach to data governance facilitates greater IT and business collaboration.

erwin by Quest

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

April 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.