AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] vs AWS Glue comparison

AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] and AWS Glue are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of AWS Glue users who would recommend it.

AWS Data Pipeline [EOL]

Read 2 AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

AWS Glue

Read 50 AWS Glue reviews

8,314 Views
5,986 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AWS Data Pipeline [EOL]

AWS Glue

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] and AWS Glue based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Palantir and others in Cloud Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Data Pipeline [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Glue

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (1st)

Featured Reviews

BarathwajRamamoorthy

Senior Director Data Architecture at Managed Markets Insight & Technology, LLC

A tool with great orchestration and development capabilities but needs to improve its user-defined functions

In the tool, parallel processing is an area that is contingent, in the sense that you have to be watchful for the cap that you have in terms of computing behind AWS Data Pipeline. You need to always watch for some reason. I am capped with 200 nodes, and if I get to use more than 200 nodes, the AWS Data Pipeline will fail. AWS doesn't state that I have almost gone beyond my limits, and it is allowing me now to go beyond the set limits if I talk to a representative and figure it out. Such aforementioned warnings are not let out by AWS, and they end up failing the nodes if I go beyond the set cap limits.

Read full review

Sridivya Chillappa

application security engineer at Hyperspace IT India

Efficient data integration reduces operational time and enhances metadata management

For the initial setup with AWS Glue, I find it easy to set up the data catalog and create Glue jobs using the visual editor or the visual code. Setting permission sets via IAM rules can be a bit tricky at the start, but we ensure Glue has access to AWS S3, Redshift, and other services. Once the role is configured, it runs smoothly. For advanced configurations, connecting to VPCs and setting up connections with JDBC sources takes more time compared to my cloud experience, but overall, for someone with cloud and ETL experience, the setup is manageable and well done.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that orchestration and development capabilities are easier with the tool."

"The solution’s most valuable feature is the ETL job."

"AWS Glue's most valuable features include its transformation capabilities, which provide data quality and shape for processing in ML or AI models."

"Our entire use case was very easily handled or solved using this solution."

"AWS Glue is fast and managed by AWS. Hence, you don't have to worry about capacity and the performance of Glue jobs. It has integrations with other data stores of AWS. The product offers metadata management, logging, and ETL processing capabilities. It comes with a powerful feature, Glue Studio, which helps to do queries interactively within the community. It is a managed service and very secure. Another popular and mature service is S3."

"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."

"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."

"One of the best features of the solution is its ability to easily integrate with other AWS services."

"It is a stable and scalable solution."

More AWS Glue pros

Cons

"The user-defined functions have shortcomings in AWS Data Pipeline."

"It's almost semi-automatic because you must review and approve code push, which works well. Still, we had many problems getting there during the deployment process, but we got there."

"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."

"The monitoring is not that good."

"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."

"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."

"Cost-wise, AWS Glue is expensive, so that's an area for improvement. The process for setting up the solution was also complex, which is another area for improvement."

"AWS Glue's error handling is difficult."

"The product has only a few built-in transformations."

"The crucial problem with AWS Glue is that it only works with AWS."

More AWS Glue cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing between six to eight on a scale from one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price."

"The way we use it, I think it is fair as we're getting a good value for money compared to having a server or some other data pipeline."

"This solution is affordable and there is an option to pay for the solution based on your usage."

"I rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."

"AWS Glue is a high-priced solution that bills the client $150,000 to $250,000 annually."

"I rate the tool an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is based on DPUs so it is a good idea to optimize use or it can get expensive."

"I would rate the solution a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, with ten being very expensive. Specifically, I rate its pricing a six out of ten."

"Technical support is a paid service, and which subscription you have is dependent on that. You must pay one of them, and it ranges from $15,000 to $25,000 per year."

"Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend."

More AWS Glue pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?

We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...

See all answers

What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?

AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs AWS Data Pipeline [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

Perspectium DataSync vs AWS Data Pipeline [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

More AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] Competitors

AWS Database Migration Service vs AWS Glue

Compared 39% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs AWS Glue

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs AWS Glue

Compared 5% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs AWS Glue

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Data Firehose vs AWS Glue

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Glue Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

June 2026

Download AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Glue

June 2026

Download AWS Glue product report

Overview

AWS Data Pipeline is a web service that helps you reliably process and move data between different AWS compute and storage services, as well as on-premises data sources, at specified intervals. ... AWS Data Pipeline also allows you to move and process data that was previously locked up in on-premises data silos.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service offering seamless integration with AWS services like S3, Redshift, and Athena. Known for its flexibility with data formats and automation of ETL tasks, AWS Glue enhances data management and transformation.

AWS Glue facilitates seamless data extraction, transformation, and loading for businesses, integrating with key AWS services, allowing efficient data pipeline automation. It's valued for a user-friendly GUI, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, supporting PySpark for complex datasets and includes a robust data catalog, real-time backup capabilities, and code generation. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in documentation, training, and broader programming language support. Users face challenges with its complex interface and integration with non-AWS products, driving demand for enhancements in its usability and performance.

What are AWS Glue's most important features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Connects effortlessly with services like S3, Redshift, and Athena.
Serverless Operation: Removes the need for infrastructure management.
Flexible Data Format Handling: Supports various data formats for comprehensive data management.
User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies the creation and management of ETL jobs.
Data Catalog: Provides an organized repository for metadata management.
Real-Time Data Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability.
Code Generation: Facilitates easy script generation for data processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced operational costs through serverless architecture.
High Performance: Efficient data processing and transformation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to businesses' evolving data demands.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface allowing streamlined ETL workflows.
Automation: Simplified data pipeline tasks saving time and effort.

Businesses leverage AWS Glue in industries for ETL processes, data integration, and transformation. It is used to optimize data lakes or warehouses integration, enhancing data cataloging and real-time integration. Its serverless feature enables efficient data processing in sectors like finance and healthcare, where handling complex data-intensive tasks is crucial.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Palantir and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.