Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025
Check Point Application Control and WatchGuard Application Control are both prominent in managing application traffic and security. Check Point appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive application recognition and more robust features.
Features: Check Point Application Control boasts a comprehensive application database supporting over 8,000 applications with granular control, including features like blocking specific app functionalities while allowing general access. It also provides seamless integration with tools such as SmartConsole and benefits from automatic updates to safeguard against the latest threats. In contrast, WatchGuard Application Control is favored for its zero-trust capability and user-friendly design but does not offer the extensive database and granularity found in Check Point.
Room for Improvement: Check Point users suggest enhancements in pricing structures and categorization, alongside a call for better documentation and integration features. Some users find HTTPS Inspection necessary despite its impact on performance. For WatchGuard, cost is the main focus for improvement, with a desire for more affordable options, as well as a request for a more intuitive user experience and improved reporting capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Check Point and WatchGuard Application Control offer versatile deployment options across various environments. Check Point receives mixed reviews on customer support—ranging from commendable to requiring faster resolution times. WatchGuard shares similar deployment flexibility. However, its customer support is regarded as competent, though users desire stronger support for upgrades and maintenance.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point is often viewed as expensive despite the sophisticated features justifying the high initial investment, resulting in positive ROI due to enhanced security and productivity. Similarly, WatchGuard is noted as slightly pricey, with its licensing model on user count seen as straightforward. Both solutions contribute to significant ROI by enhancing security measures and optimizing operational efficiency, yet Check Point is documented with more extensive ROI reports attributed to broader functionality.
