Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs WinMagic SecureDoc comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
7th
Ranking in Mobile Data Protection
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WinMagic SecureDoc
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
10th
Ranking in Mobile Data Protection
8th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WinMagic SecureDoc is 3.8%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Encryption
 

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.
it_user774159 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides DLP and security of all company data on workstations, however we had issues with deployment on legacy-formatted drives
The Central Management server Provides DLP and security of all company data on workstations. MacOS X is missing features. OS X High Sierra is still not supported. 11 months. We had issues with deployment on legacy-formatted drives so make sure you know how your drives are formatted. The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."
"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."
"The Central Management server."
 

Cons

"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."
"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"MacOS X is missing features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."
"Licensing and pricing is on par with the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Security Firm
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
8%
Government
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.
What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the usern...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
SecureDoc
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
NEC Group,Export Development Canada, SecureDoc University of Guelph, Swiss Bank, Suva (Swiss Accident Insurance), Money Partners (UK), Children's Hospital of Denver, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Arch Chemicals
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.