HPE ProCurve and Cisco Catalyst Switches compete in the networking equipment category. HPE ProCurve has the upper hand in pricing and warranty, while Cisco Catalyst is favored for its stability and extensive features.
Features: HPE ProCurve offers a lifetime warranty, a robust design, and seamless integration with other networking products. Its easy management and intuitive interface are significant benefits. Cisco Catalyst is known for stability, a comprehensive feature set, and high performance, with robust security and management capabilities.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve users mention the older web interface and lack of high-speed connectivity options. There's a need to enhance scalability and user-friendliness. Cisco Catalyst drawbacks include a high price, complicated licensing, and support responsiveness. Improving third-party integration and management solutions is also suggested.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve is praised for its straightforward setup and responsive customer service backed by a strong warranty. Cisco Catalyst Switches benefit from extensive documentation and strong support networks, but accessing support can be challenging, requiring technical expertise for setup.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve is more cost-effective, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and a lifetime warranty. Customers report a good ROI due to reliability and low maintenance costs. Cisco Catalyst, although more expensive, is a worthwhile investment for organizations needing comprehensive features and stability. However, high costs and licensing complexity can impact ROI, though many find the expense justified by performance and features.
From an investment standpoint, deploying Cisco Catalyst Switches offers tangible benefits, including cost reductions.
On a scale from one to 10, I would rate the technical support of Cisco at 10 out of 10.
Cisco support is very good and responsive.
Cisco's support is good, one of the best supports that you will get.
The need to frequently contact support suggests we are not getting sufficient effectiveness from the service.
The scalability of Cisco Catalyst Switches is very much scalable, as it supports the stacking feature and growth; for instance, with 94K modular switches, based on the requirement, we can even increase modules for more bandwidth.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are scalable, and I would rate them eight to nine out of ten for scalability.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are stable.
It is 60 to 70% stable, depending on usage intensity.
Currently, I don't see much AI integration with Cisco Catalyst Switches; though they've started, it still needs improvement.
The configuration options on the Cisco Commerce website could be more efficient.
There could be improvements in the repeat configuration with some file integration that is currently missing.
When running bots, the system occasionally gets stuck, requiring reboots which result in memory loss and data loss.
Cisco provides unique features that justify their pricing.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are quite pricey.
Cisco usually is costly compared to other vendors.
For market-related sites, AWS pricing becomes significantly higher compared to DigitalOcean.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are valuable for their reliability and performance.
Catalyst Switches are efficient and swift, which is valuable for my organization.
The most beneficial features for our network management are their stability and good customer support.
It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are a reliable and scalable network switching and routing solution, focusing on VLANs and VLAN switching. They are used as access switches, distribution switches, and core switches in various environments, deployed on-premises, and used for long connections. The switches are easy to configure, install, and upgrade and offer good pricing.
The most valuable features include warranty and firmware support, stability, security, good performance, flexibility, etc. The Cisco Catalyst Switches have provided a stable solution for the organizations and are widely used, trusted, and well-known in the networking industry.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
