Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] vs Snyk comparison

Cisco and Snyk are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.
Snyk
Read 48 Snyk reviews
  • 211 Views
  • 166 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] and Snyk compete in the cloud infrastructure and security sectors. Snyk has the advantage due to its advanced security features and robust solutions.

Features: Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] is recognized for its scalability, integration capabilities, and infrastructure management tools. Snyk is valued for seamless integration with development workflows, its vulnerability database, and automated security fixes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] provides straightforward deployment with reliable customer support, complementing infrastructure services. Snyk integrates seamlessly into existing environments, offering effective support with agile deployment tailored for security enhancement.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] is praised for competitive setup costs and solid ROI in infrastructure investment. Snyk involves higher initial setup costs, but justifies the expense with enhanced security features and rapid threat mitigation, leading to significant long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Snyk
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Cloud Management (14th), Container Security (5th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Enterprise677 - PeerSpot reviewer
A simple interface and helpful support for a solution that grows with us
It's a flexible enough tool to submit the changes that you want. It gives you the ability to cancel any loop. You can connect new orchestrations together. It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device. The user interface is simple and easy to use.
Read full review
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles
The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device."
"There are many valuable features. For example, the way the scanning feature works. The integration is cool because I can integrate it and I don't need to wait until the CACD, I can plug it in to our local ID, and there I can do the scanning. That is the part I like best."
"We have integrated it into our software development environment. We have it in a couple different spots. Developers can use it at the point when they are developing. They can test it on their local machine. If the setup that they have is producing alerts or if they need to upgrade or patch, then at the testing phase when a product is being built for automated testing integrates with Snyk at that point and also produces some checks."
"Snyk categorizes the level of vulnerability into high, medium, and low, which helps organizations prioritize which issues to tackle first."
"Snyk is a good and scalable tool."
"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."
"The solution has great features and is quite stable."
"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."
"It is easy for developers to use. The documentation is clear as well as the APIs are good and easily readable. It's a good solution overall."
More Snyk pros
 

Cons

"The solution is just too expensive, so maybe the pricing could be better."
"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."
"The solution could improve the reports. They have been working on improving the reports but more work could be done."
"I would like to give further ability to grouping code repositories, in such a way that you could group them by the teams that own them, then produce alerting to those teams. The way that we are seeing it right now, the alerting only goes to a couple of places. I wish we could configure the code to go to different places."
"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."
"There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated."
"We've also had technical issues with blocking newly introduced vulnerabilities in PRs and that was creating a lot of extra work for developers in trying to close and reopen the PR to get rid of some areas. We ended up having to disable that feature altogether because it wasn't really working for us and it was actually slowing down developer velocity."
"Basically the licensing costs are a little bit expensive."
"The way Snyk notifies if we have an issue, there are a few options: High vulnerability or medium vulnerability. The problem with that is high vulnerabilities are too broad, because there are too many. If you enable notifications, you get a lot of notifications, When you get many notifications, they become irrelevant because they're not specific. I would prefer to have control over the notifications and somehow decide if I want to get only exploitable vulnerabilities or get a specific score for a vulnerability. Right now, we receive too many high vulnerabilities. If we enable notifications, then we just get a lot of spam message. Therefore, we would like some type of filtering system to be built-in for the system to be more precise."
More Snyk cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."
"We are using the open-source version for the scans."
"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."
"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."
"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."
"Presently, my company uses an open-source version of the solution. The solution's pricing can be considered quite reasonable owing to the features they offer."
More Snyk pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?
Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...
See all answers
What do you like most about Snyk?
The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Snyk?
There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk
Compared 11% of the time
Trivy vs Snyk Logo
Trivy vs Snyk
Compared 9% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk
Compared 8% of the time
Wiz vs Snyk Logo
Wiz vs Snyk
Compared 7% of the time
Black Duck vs Snyk Logo
Black Duck vs Snyk
Compared 6% of the time
More Snyk Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
June 2025
Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] reportDownload Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Snyk
June 2025
Snyk reportDownload Snyk product report
 

Also Known As

Piston Enterprise OS
Fugue
 

Overview

Piston Enterprise OS (pentOS) is an enterprise grade cloud operating system meeting the security and governance needs of enterprises wanting to use OpenStack for their infrastructure services. pentOS is an OpenStack distro that builds on top of the OpenStack codebase adding some proprietary features to meet the security and governance needs of the enterprise customers.

Cisco

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?
  • Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
  • Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
  • Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
  • Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
  • Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.
What benefits should users consider in reviews?
  • Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
  • Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
  • Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
  • Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Snyk
 

Sample Customers

Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, VMware, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.